Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

SUPERCILEX
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #96274

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jun 20, 2022
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

r? @nikic

It could make sense to land this with a min-llvm-version 15, I suppose, but not sure how we feel about such future tests.

@SUPERCILEX
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm fine just letting this sit until August FYI.

@JohnCSimon
Copy link
Member

ping from triage:
@SUPERCILEX
Returning to you to address broken build

FYI: when a PR is ready for review, send a message containing
@rustbot ready to switch to S-waiting-on-review so the PR is in the reviewer's backlog.

@rustbot author

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 24, 2022
Signed-off-by: Alex Saveau <[email protected]>
@SUPERCILEX
Copy link
Contributor Author

@JohnCSimon looks like llvm 13 is still used in CI even though #99464 happened, so I added a // min-llvm-version: 15.0. Is that fine? E.g. will the test actually be run at some point by CI on llvm 15?

@SUPERCILEX
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rustbot ready

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Aug 25, 2022
@nikic
Copy link
Contributor

nikic commented Aug 28, 2022

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 28, 2022

📌 Commit 8c62cc2 has been approved by nikic

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 28, 2022
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2022
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#98304 (Add MaybeUninit memset test)
 - rust-lang#98801 (Add a `File::create_new` constructor)
 - rust-lang#99821 (Remove separate indexing of early-bound regions)
 - rust-lang#100239 (remove an ineffective check in const_prop)
 - rust-lang#100337 (Stabilize `std::io::read_to_string`)
 - rust-lang#100819 (Make use of `[wrapping_]byte_{add,sub}`)
 - rust-lang#100934 (Remove a panicking branch from `fmt::builders::PadAdapter`)
 - rust-lang#101000 (Separate CountIsStar from CountIsParam in rustc_parse_format.)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 4cac0bf into rust-lang:master Aug 29, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.65.0 milestone Aug 29, 2022
@SUPERCILEX SUPERCILEX deleted the maybeuninit branch August 30, 2022 01:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[MaybeUninit::uninit(); N] memsets memory
8 participants