Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

CLDSRV-862: add automated PR review skill and CI workflow#6090

Open
nicolas2bert wants to merge 1 commit intodevelopment/9.2from
improvement/CLDSRV-862/claude-review
Open

CLDSRV-862: add automated PR review skill and CI workflow#6090
nicolas2bert wants to merge 1 commit intodevelopment/9.2from
improvement/CLDSRV-862/claude-review

Conversation

@nicolas2bert
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Mar 2, 2026

Hello nicolas2bert,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Mar 2, 2026

Incorrect fix version

The Fix Version/s in issue CLDSRV-862 contains:

  • None

Considering where you are trying to merge, I ignored possible hotfix versions and I expected to find:

  • 9.2.29

  • 9.3.5

  • 9.4.0

Please check the Fix Version/s of CLDSRV-862, or the target
branch of this pull request.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 2, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 84.17%. Comparing base (9b836b8) to head (9d8021a).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on development/9.2.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           development/9.2    #6090   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage            84.17%   84.17%           
================================================
  Files                  204      204           
  Lines                13124    13124           
================================================
  Hits                 11047    11047           
  Misses                2077     2077           
Flag Coverage Δ
file-ft-tests 67.62% <ø> (ø)
kmip-ft-tests 28.19% <ø> (ø)
mongo-v0-ft-tests 68.86% <ø> (ø)
mongo-v1-ft-tests 68.85% <ø> (ø)
multiple-backend 35.24% <ø> (ø)
sur-tests 35.75% <ø> (ø)
sur-tests-inflights 37.61% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
unit 69.71% <ø> (ø)
utapi-v2-tests 34.50% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@nicolas2bert nicolas2bert force-pushed the improvement/CLDSRV-862/claude-review branch from ce85e41 to 98168cd Compare March 2, 2026 15:30
@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Mar 2, 2026

Request integration branches

Waiting for integration branch creation to be requested by the user.

To request integration branches, please comment on this pull request with the following command:

/create_integration_branches

Alternatively, the /approve and /create_pull_requests commands will automatically
create the integration branches.


3. **Analyze the changes** against these criteria:

- **Async error handling** — uncaught promise
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The max line length before wrapping seems super low, is it a copy&paste effect? Can you change it to the standard value 80 or higher?

@nicolas2bert nicolas2bert force-pushed the improvement/CLDSRV-862/claude-review branch from 98168cd to 9d8021a Compare March 3, 2026 09:16
@nicolas2bert
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bert-e approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Mar 3, 2026

Integration data created

I have created the integration data for the additional destination branches.

The following branches will NOT be impacted:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.8
  • development/9.0
  • development/9.1

You can set option create_pull_requests if you need me to create
integration pull requests in addition to integration branches, with:

@bert-e create_pull_requests

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Mar 3, 2026

In the queue

The changeset has received all authorizations and has been added to the
relevant queue(s). The queue(s) will be merged in the target development
branch(es) as soon as builds have passed.

The changeset will be merged in:

  • ✔️ development/9.2

  • ✔️ development/9.3

  • ✔️ development/9.4

The following branches will NOT be impacted:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.8
  • development/9.0
  • development/9.1

There is no action required on your side. You will be notified here once
the changeset has been merged. In the unlikely event that the changeset
fails permanently on the queue, a member of the admin team will
contact you to help resolve the matter.

IMPORTANT

Please do not attempt to modify this pull request.

  • Any commit you add on the source branch will trigger a new cycle after the
    current queue is merged.
  • Any commit you add on one of the integration branches will be lost.

If you need this pull request to be removed from the queue, please contact a
member of the admin team now.

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Mar 3, 2026

Queue build failed

The corresponding build for the queue failed:

  • Checkout the status page.
  • Identify the failing build and review the logs.
  • If no issue is found, re-run the build.
  • If an issue is identified, checkout the steps below to remove
    the pull request from the queue for further analysis and maybe rebase/merge.
Remove the pull request from the queue
  • Add a /wait comment on this pull request.
  • Click on login on the status page.
  • Go into the manage page.
  • Find the option called Rebuild the queue and click on it.
    Bert-E will loop again on all pull requests to put the valid ones
    in the queue again, while skipping the one with the /wait comment.
  • Wait for the new queue to merge, then merge/rebase your pull request
    with the latest changes to then work on a proper fix.
  • Once the issue is fixed, delete the /wait comment and
    follow the usual process to merge the pull request.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants