Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

MridulS
Copy link
Member

@MridulS MridulS commented Sep 30, 2024

I'm not sure, but I think with the change to composite action we need to also be specific about this repo's filepaths by using GITHUB_ACTION_PATH . I tried to use 0.6.0 downstream and I got an error `Failed to generate cache key: Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, open 'pixi.lock'

Squash and merge commit message

* As the GitHub Action is being used in other workflows, it does not know the
  local filepaths and so to have prefix-dev/setup-pixi find the lock file and
  'pixi run' know where `upload_wheels.sh` is, the environmental variable
  'GITHUB_ACTION_PATH' is used through the ${{ github.action_path }} context.
   - c.f. https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-what-your-workflow-does/store-information-in-variables#default-environment-variables

I'm not sure, but I think with the change to composite action we need to also be specific about this repo's filepaths by using `GITHUB_ACTION_PATH` . I tried to use `0.6.0` downstream and I got an error `Failed to generate cache key: Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, open 'pixi.lock'
@matthewfeickert
Copy link
Member

Can you link to the failure downstream? If it is complaining about the lock file that seems different.

@MridulS
Copy link
Member Author

MridulS commented Sep 30, 2024

Copy link
Member

@matthewfeickert matthewfeickert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@MridulS To see if this actually works could you (momentarily and then revert it) switch in the CI the local action path

to use your fork's MridulS-patch-1 branch?

edit: Ah, sorry I see that this is a branch on the main repo. I just misread your branch name. Let me try this quickly using my fork and your changes on a different branch.

Co-authored-by: Matthew Feickert <[email protected]>
@MridulS MridulS temporarily deployed to remove-old-wheels September 30, 2024 15:13 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@matthewfeickert
Copy link
Member

@MridulS Okay, yes that works. Thank you!

What I did to test was to push your MridulS-patch-1 branch to my fork

$ git branch --all | grep patch
  MridulS-patch-1
* debug-ci-with-mriduls-patch
  matthewfeickert/MridulS-patch-1
  remotes/matthewfeickert/MridulS-patch-1
  remotes/origin/MridulS-patch-1
  remotes/origin/debug-ci-with-mriduls-patch

and then run the CI manually on another branch using my fork as the target

$ git branch
  MridulS-patch-1
* debug-ci-with-mriduls-patch
  main
  matthewfeickert/MridulS-patch-1
$ git diff origin/main 
diff --git a/.github/workflows/ci.yml b/.github/workflows/ci.yml
index cdd4d13..19d0427 100644
--- a/.github/workflows/ci.yml
+++ b/.github/workflows/ci.yml
@@ -48,13 +48,13 @@ jobs:
         run: python -m zipfile --list dist/test_package-*.whl
 
       - name: Test upload
-        uses: ./
+        uses: matthewfeickert/upload-nightly-action@MridulS-patch-1
         with:
           artifacts_path: dist
           anaconda_nightly_upload_token: ${{ secrets.UPLOAD_TOKEN }}
 
       - name: Test upload that forces removal first
-        uses: ./
+        uses: matthewfeickert/upload-nightly-action@MridulS-patch-1
         with:
           artifacts_path: dist
           anaconda_nightly_upload_token: ${{ secrets.UPLOAD_TOKEN }}
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ jobs:
           python -m build --outdir ./dist tests/test_package
 
       - name: Test upload with non-main label
-        uses: ./
+        uses: matthewfeickert/upload-nightly-action@MridulS-patch-1
         with:
           artifacts_path: dist
           anaconda_nightly_upload_token: ${{ secrets.UPLOAD_TOKEN }}
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ jobs:
           python -m build --outdir ./dist tests/test_package
 
       - name: Test upload with multiple labels
-        uses: ./
+        uses: matthewfeickert/upload-nightly-action@MridulS-patch-1
         with:
           artifacts_path: dist
           anaconda_nightly_upload_token: ${{ secrets.UPLOAD_TOKEN }}

That works. 👍

We need better testing though apparently.

I'm going to write some longer squash and merge commit message and then I'll merge this and get a patch release out.

@matthewfeickert matthewfeickert changed the title MAINT: Use $GITHUB_ACTION_PATH to locate pixi.lock for downstream users FIX: Use $GITHUB_ACTION_PATH to locate pixi.lock for downstream users Sep 30, 2024
@matthewfeickert matthewfeickert added the fix fixes a bug label Sep 30, 2024
@matthewfeickert matthewfeickert merged commit 40829e9 into main Sep 30, 2024
2 checks passed
@matthewfeickert matthewfeickert deleted the MridulS-patch-1 branch September 30, 2024 15:29
@MridulS
Copy link
Member Author

MridulS commented Sep 30, 2024

Thanks @matthewfeickert!

We need better testing though apparently.

Testing actions inside actions are tricky anyway.

I think it's still not done yet! We need to add --manifest-path to pixi run too! (finding new edges for pixi :) )

MridulS added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2024
I missed this in #96 but we need to be explicit while using `pixi run` too.

I was tripping into `could not find pixi.toml or pyproject.toml which is configured to use pixi` while on the `pixi run` step downstream.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
fix fixes a bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants