Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Bayesian regression #5

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
vmichel opened this issue Sep 11, 2010 · 11 comments
Closed

Bayesian regression #5

vmichel opened this issue Sep 11, 2010 · 11 comments

Comments

@vmichel
Copy link
Member

vmichel commented Sep 11, 2010

Add priors on the mean instead of assuming that the prior means are zero.
Add more reference in the doc.
Modify ARD in order to use a vector of hyperparameters for the precision instead of a single value.
Spelling : defaut -> default unless you insist on using french, spelling out ARD (Automatic Relevance Determination) regression in the docstring as in the comment line would be useful.

Thanks to Josef for the remarks.
@fabianp
Copy link
Member

fabianp commented Jan 11, 2011

Any progress on this ?

@vmichel
Copy link
Member Author

vmichel commented Jan 11, 2011

Nope, but I will try it asap, in the next weeks.

@fabianp
Copy link
Member

fabianp commented Jan 12, 2011

Cool. First learn mutt, then fix this :-)

larsmans referenced this issue in larsmans/scikit-learn Jul 15, 2011
@agramfort
Merged pull request #5 from larsmans/master.
7826fff 
Some more copyediting, as well as a small section on cross-validation
agramfort referenced this issue in agramfort/scikit-learn Sep 9, 2011
@vene
Merge pull request #5 from agramfort/sc
24c3a68 
Sc
@agramfort
Copy link
Member

what's our status on this?

@vmichel
Copy link
Member Author

vmichel commented Dec 19, 2011

Didn't work on this.

@amueller
Copy link
Member

amueller commented Jan 6, 2012

What do you think about my PR: #534 ?

@vmichel
Copy link
Member Author

vmichel commented Jan 6, 2012

Seems good ! Thanks for cleaning this. Any way, I think that the Bayesian side of skl needs more love (and my TODO list is already long !)... Bayesian classification, different priors (using pyMC ?)

@amueller
Copy link
Member

amueller commented Jan 6, 2012

Thanks :)
Might need still more love ;)
I'm not actually using any Bayesian models, I just tried to use what I understood from Bishop's book to hopefully make this a little more clear ;)

@vmichel
Copy link
Member Author

vmichel commented Jan 6, 2012

I'm not a Bayesian specialist too, so feel free to update this part of the SKL !

@amueller
Copy link
Member

amueller commented Jan 6, 2012

Do you still plan on working this? Otherwise I'd close the issue. If you have any more specific remarks, I'll gladly include them in my pull request.

@vmichel
Copy link
Member Author

vmichel commented Jan 6, 2012

I will not work on this in the next weeks, so you can close the pull request. For me, due to the amount of work, Bayesian methods improvements in SKL should be dealt with in a dedicated sprint.

@amueller amueller closed this as completed Jan 6, 2012
amueller referenced this issue in amueller/scikit-learn Mar 31, 2012
@robertlayton
Merge pull request #5 from larsmans/nearest_centroids
46fcc12 
Nearest centroids
@GaelVaroquaux GaelVaroquaux mentioned this issue Oct 23, 2012
Closed
glouppe referenced this issue in glouppe/scikit-learn Dec 18, 2012
@ndawe
Merge pull request #5 from glouppe/treeweights
86d9453 
MRG: Changes and fixes on treeweights
jaquesgrobler pushed a commit to jaquesgrobler/scikit-learn that referenced this issue Jul 25, 2013
@amueller
Merge pull request scikit-learn#5 from NelleV/redo_website_yet_again
4f1ae98 
FIX added some descriptions to each categories in the main webpage
@ogrisel ogrisel mentioned this issue Sep 20, 2013
Closed
ashimb9 added a commit to ashimb9/scikit-learn that referenced this issue Jul 31, 2017
@ashimb9
Addressed review comments scikit-learn#5
a31c43a
praths007 referenced this issue in praths007/scikit-learn Mar 26, 2019
@praths007
review changes #5 (tweaked test cases)
4accc4e
@Minqi824 Minqi824 mentioned this issue Apr 26, 2019
Closed
@monikasoni monikasoni mentioned this issue Nov 9, 2019
Closed
@xandercage434 xandercage434 mentioned this issue Aug 19, 2020
Closed
prismdata pushed a commit to prismdata/scikit-learn that referenced this issue Oct 28, 2020
@prismdata-dc
Merge pull request scikit-learn#5 from sjtetris/master
02fe86e 
package yaml
hongshaoyang pushed a commit to hongshaoyang/scikit-learn that referenced this issue Nov 10, 2020
@arka204
Merge pull request scikit-learn#5 from arka204/alpha-1
4606d85 
Update branch
@ogrisel ogrisel mentioned this issue Nov 25, 2020
Closed
@ZHCSOFT ZHCSOFT mentioned this issue Mar 10, 2022
Closed
adrinjalali referenced this issue in adrinjalali/scikit-learn Jul 17, 2023
@OmarManzoor
Merge pull request #5 from adrinjalali/slep6/cleanup
93a39bf 
Slep6/cleanup
@glemaitre glemaitre mentioned this issue Jan 27, 2024
Merged
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@agramfort @fabianp @vmichel @amueller