Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Verbose option on Pipeline #5298

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
samzhang111 opened this issue Sep 23, 2015 · 16 comments · Fixed by #11364
Closed

Verbose option on Pipeline #5298

samzhang111 opened this issue Sep 23, 2015 · 16 comments · Fixed by #11364
Labels
Easy Well-defined and straightforward way to resolve Enhancement Sprint

Comments

@samzhang111
Copy link

Would like to see timing information for individual steps in a pipeline. Perhaps a named variable for "verbose" in the pipeline constructor?

@jnothman
Copy link
Member

Would storing this information in the pipeline instance suffice or are you looking for realtime feedback? Obviously storing on the pipeline instance means the information disappears after a cross_val_score or *SearchCV run.

@samzhang111
Copy link
Author

Realtime feedback, like the highest verbosity on GridSearchCV. When pipelines get long it is useful to know what stage they are at.

@jnothman
Copy link
Member

I'd be okay with this.

On 24 September 2015 at 06:04, Sam Zhang [email protected] wrote:

Realtime feedback, like the highest verbosity on GridSearchCV. When
pipelines get long it is useful to know what stage they are at.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#5298 (comment)
.

@amueller
Copy link
Member

Yeah I feel optional verbosity is usually good.

@glouppe glouppe added Easy Well-defined and straightforward way to resolve Enhancement Need Contributor labels Oct 19, 2015
@amandeepgautam
Copy link

I would like to take this up, if it is still available.

@samzhang111
Copy link
Author

For some reason the appveyor build on my PR failed, but Circle and Travis passed. The errors looked to be located outside my PR. If there's any additional work that needs to be done for a merge, feel free to help out.

@raghavrv
Copy link
Member

@amandeepgautam There is an active PR at #5321 Could you take up some other issue to work on?

@jnothman
Copy link
Member

jnothman commented Jan 18, 2017

#5321 is stalled.

@jnothman
Copy link
Member

jnothman commented Feb 2, 2017

@karandesai-96, if you're bored, you can tackle getting this verbose logging consistent... I'd like to see FeatureUnion covered too.

@kdexd
Copy link

kdexd commented Feb 9, 2017

@jnothman It has been a week since you last commented so I thought it would be better to inform, I am occupied with a couple of open PRs elsewhere so will return to this once they get approved, thanks.

@jnothman
Copy link
Member

jnothman commented Feb 9, 2017 via email

@kdexd
Copy link

kdexd commented Mar 10, 2017

@amueller @jnothman I have a PR open (#8568). Though it is WIP, I ensure you that it would be done within some time. Safe to remove Need Contributor label here 😄

@MichaelChirico
Copy link

@karandesai-96 any update?

@amueller
Copy link
Member

I guess stalled again?

@jamesalbert
Copy link

need more verbosity

@dkaushik96
Copy link

No updates?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment