-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.8k
Common test: predict_proba as a monotonic transformation of decision_function #7578
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Could I participate here as a contributor? |
@ivallesp try one of them at a time ;) |
Cool, good idea. So I choose the other one!
|
Hello sir can I work on this one! |
you're welcome to have a go
…On 31 Jan 2017 4:15 am, "Shubham Bhardwaj" ***@***.***> wrote:
Hello sir can I work on this one!
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#7578 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAEz6-bEn6ZePNvemi73v_z0WEXY83PKks5rXhq6gaJpZM4KOU8e>
.
|
I am getting an error while trying to test run the file check_estimators: |
…n_proba_consistency
…y in estimator_checks (scikit-learn#8253)
…y in estimator_checks (scikit-learn#8253)
…y in estimator_checks (scikit-learn#8253)
…y in estimator_checks (scikit-learn#8253)
…y in estimator_checks (scikit-learn#8253)
…y in estimator_checks (scikit-learn#8253)
…y in estimator_checks (scikit-learn#8253)
We should have a common test ensuring that, if both
decision_function
andpredict_proba
are available on an estimator, their outputs have perfect rank correlation.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: