Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Correcting description of test_size parameter in model_selection.GroupShuffleSplit #13414

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 12, 2019
Merged

Correcting description of test_size parameter in model_selection.GroupShuffleSplit #13414

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 12, 2019

Conversation

OFlanagan
Copy link
Contributor

@OFlanagan OFlanagan commented Mar 8, 2019

Reference Issues/PRs

Fixes issue (1) in #13369

What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.

Corrected docstring to reflect that if the test_size parameter is passed an int, it represents the absolute number of test groups. This is in line with the rest of the documentation.

Any other comments?

…assed an int, it represents the absolute number of test groups. This is in line with the rest of the documentation.
@OFlanagan OFlanagan changed the title Correcting description of test_sting parameter in model_selection.GroupShuffleSplit Correcting description of test_size parameter in model_selection.GroupShuffleSplit Mar 8, 2019
@jnothman jnothman merged commit f4e5224 into scikit-learn:master Mar 12, 2019
@jnothman
Copy link
Member

Thanks @OFlanagan!

@OFlanagan OFlanagan deleted the CorrectingGroupShuffleSplitDocumentation branch March 13, 2019 07:16
xhluca pushed a commit to xhluca/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2019
xhluca pushed a commit to xhluca/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2019
xhluca pushed a commit to xhluca/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2019
koenvandevelde pushed a commit to koenvandevelde/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants