-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26k
[MRG] FIX Allow to disable estimator and passing weight in Voting estimators #13779
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could consider squeezing into 0.21 if approved soon
doc/whats_new/v0.22.rst
Outdated
- |Fix| :class:`sklearn.ensemble.VotingClassifier` and | ||
:class:`sklearn.ensemble.VotingRegressor` were failing during ``fit`` in one | ||
- |Fix| :class:`ensemble.VotingClassifier` and | ||
:class:`ensemble.VotingRegressor` were failing during ``fit`` in one |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In -> if
No strong opinion. It's not a regression, but not trivial IMO. |
We would include it in 0.21.0 because it creates consistency with the use
of "drop" and "passthrough" in other estimators with similar syntax. (And
because it does not introduce much risk by not having been part of a
pre-release)
|
+1, ping @glemaitre |
OK solving the merge problem then |
I moved in 0.21. We also need to merge #13780 regarding the introduction of |
close #13777
This allows fitting with weights in Voting estimators even when one of then is set to
None
.