TST Inject placeholder value for MeanShift.bandwidth #21501
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This modify the test configuration so that it makes sense for when a sole sample is provided for MeanShift. This test was passing previously for this configuration but was not supposed to. The new implementation strategy for kneighbors which uses PairwiseDistancesArgKmin (see scikit-learn#21462) is numerically stabler for this case, motivating this modication. Co-authored-by: Guillaume Lemaitre <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Jérémie du Boisberranger <[email protected]>
jeremiedbb
approved these changes
Oct 29, 2021
ogrisel
approved these changes
Oct 29, 2021
|
|
|
Let my try to cancel and re-run. |
|
Ok this time the test passed. Will merge without waiting for PyPy. |
samronsin
pushed a commit
to samronsin/scikit-learn
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 30, 2021
…cikit-learn#21501) This modify the test configuration so that it makes sense for when a sole sample is provided for MeanShift. This test was passing previously for this configuration but was not supposed to. The new implementation strategy for kneighbors which uses PairwiseDistancesArgKmin (see scikit-learn#21462) is numerically stabler for this case, motivating this modication. Co-authored-by: Guillaume Lemaitre <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Jérémie du Boisberranger <[email protected]>
glemaitre
added a commit
to glemaitre/scikit-learn
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 24, 2021
…cikit-learn#21501) This modify the test configuration so that it makes sense for when a sole sample is provided for MeanShift. This test was passing previously for this configuration but was not supposed to. The new implementation strategy for kneighbors which uses PairwiseDistancesArgKmin (see scikit-learn#21462) is numerically stabler for this case, motivating this modication. Co-authored-by: Guillaume Lemaitre <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Jérémie du Boisberranger <[email protected]>
glemaitre
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 25, 2021
…21501) This modify the test configuration so that it makes sense for when a sole sample is provided for MeanShift. This test was passing previously for this configuration but was not supposed to. The new implementation strategy for kneighbors which uses PairwiseDistancesArgKmin (see #21462) is numerically stabler for this case, motivating this modication. Co-authored-by: Guillaume Lemaitre <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Jérémie du Boisberranger <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reference Issues/PRs
None.
What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.
This modify the test configuration so that it makes sense for when a sole sample is provided for MeanShift.
This test was passing previously for this configuration but was not supposed to.
The new implementation strategy for kneighbors which uses
PairwiseDistancesArgKmin(see #21462) is numerically stablerfor this case, motivating this modication.
Any other comments
Discussed with @glemaitre and @jeremiedbb.
The commit originates from #21462 but was requested by @ogrisel
for a PR.