-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.9k
DOC Ensure that tosequence passes numpydoc validation #22494
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…it-learn into numpydoc-validation
Hey there @Kaysera! Just wanted to mention that, as specified in #21350, you should:
So in this case, you should change your title to "DOC Ensure that tosequence passes numpydoc validation". |
@Micky774 Thank you for your input. Changed! |
Added suggestion to convert some words to math notation Co-authored-by: Guillaume Lemaitre <[email protected]>
@glemaitre Thanks for the suggestions. Changed! |
LGTM. Let's merge since the CIs are green. |
Edit: actually I am wrong. Please ignore. |
I could have been wrong as well. Better to have a second pair of eyes even with simple documentation changes. |
…2494) Co-authored-by: Guillaume Lemaitre <[email protected]>
Reference Issues/PRs
Addresses #21350
What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.
FUNCTION_DOCSTRING_IGNORE_LIST
x
Returns
Any other comments?