Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

[MRG] Fix consistency issue between scorer string and metrics function #2348

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 7, 2013

Conversation

arjoly
Copy link
Member

@arjoly arjoly commented Aug 7, 2013

This pr fix the last consistency issue between scorer and metrics function (#2096).
I finally chose to rename auc_score to roc_auc_score, auc_scorer to roc_auc_scorer
to have the most explicit name.

I haven't created an alias since I think that is a bad option.

@jaquesgrobler
Copy link
Member

Looks good to me..had a quick look through code. nice work!

@ogrisel
Copy link
Member

ogrisel commented Aug 7, 2013

LGTM too. This could be included in 0.14. WDYT @GaelVaroquaux?

@GaelVaroquaux
Copy link
Member

LGTM to. This could be included in 0.14. WDYT @GaelVaroquaux?

Good with me. Could someone do the cherry-picking?

ogrisel added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2013
[MRG] Fix consistency issue between scorer string and metrics function
@ogrisel ogrisel merged commit 4cb0024 into scikit-learn:master Aug 7, 2013
@ogrisel
Copy link
Member

ogrisel commented Aug 7, 2013

Ok merged to master, I am testing the cherry-pick to 0.14.X right now.

@jaquesgrobler
Copy link
Member

nice one!

@ogrisel
Copy link
Member

ogrisel commented Aug 7, 2013

Pushed to 0.14.X as well!

@arjoly arjoly deleted the deprecate-auc_score branch August 7, 2013 14:44
@arjoly
Copy link
Member Author

arjoly commented Aug 7, 2013

Good 👍 :-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants