-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.9k
DOC Ensures that sklearn.metrics._classification.log_loss passes numpydoc validation #23657
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for the PR!
Co-authored-by: Thomas J. Fan <[email protected]>
Reversed the changes keeping the commit. Don't know if this is a good practise. |
Not an issue in scikit-learn since we squash the commits before merging anyway |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @paulo-smcs
…ydoc validation (scikit-learn#23657) Co-authored-by: Thomas J. Fan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Jérémie du Boisberranger <[email protected]>
…ydoc validation (scikit-learn#23657) Co-authored-by: Thomas J. Fan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Jérémie du Boisberranger <[email protected]>
…ydoc validation (#23657) Co-authored-by: Thomas J. Fan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Jérémie du Boisberranger <[email protected]>
Reference Issues/PRs
Adress #21350
What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.
Make sure that the docstring passes the numpydoc test.
Any other comments?
To pass the test I had to add a description of the returned value of the log_loss function. I am not sure if my description, was the most appropriate one. If would by nice to check it. Thanks!