DOC relabel some PRs as efficiency #31934
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
betatim
approved these changes
Aug 13, 2025
lucyleeow
pushed a commit
to lucyleeow/scikit-learn
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 22, 2025
DeaMariaLeon
pushed a commit
to DeaMariaLeon/scikit-learn
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 12, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reference Issues/PRs
#31665
#31848
#31880
#31387
What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.
Those 4 PRs are better labeled as "efficiency" instead of "enhancement".
Any other comments?