Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

[MRG+1] correct condition in decision tree construction #7441

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
glouppe merged 4 commits into from
Sep 29, 2016
Merged

[MRG+1] correct condition in decision tree construction #7441

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
ceaa894
remove unused condition in decision tree construction
nelson-liu Sep 15, 2016
b897dad
edit is_leaf condition for min_weight_leaf
nelson-liu Sep 28, 2016
57a5c44
edit ordering of statements
nelson-liu Sep 28, 2016
35ed851
remove extra parens and add whats new
nelson-liu Sep 28, 2016
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
7 changes: 7 additions & 0 deletions doc/whats_new.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -20,6 +20,13 @@ New features
Enhancements
............

- Edited criterion for leaf nodes in decision tree criterion by declaring a
node as a leaf if the weighted number of samples at the node is less than
2 * the minimum weight specified to be at a node. This makes growth more
efficient, but trees using parameters that modify the weight at each leaf
Copy link
Member

@jnothman jnothman Sep 30, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is a confusing way of stating it. Will fix it up in master.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@nelson-liu nelson-liu Sep 30, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks @jnothman

Copy link
Member

@jnothman jnothman Sep 30, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

20d0b00

will be grown differently. (`#7441
<https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/7441>`_) by `Nelson
Liu`_.

Bug fixes
.........
Expand Down
18 changes: 9 additions & 9 deletions sklearn/tree/_tree.pyx
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -216,10 +216,10 @@ cdef class DepthFirstTreeBuilder(TreeBuilder):
n_node_samples = end - start
splitter.node_reset(start, end, &weighted_n_node_samples)

is_leaf = ((depth >= max_depth) or
(n_node_samples < min_samples_split) or
(n_node_samples < 2 * min_samples_leaf) or
(weighted_n_node_samples < min_weight_leaf))
is_leaf = (depth >= max_depth or
n_node_samples < min_samples_split or
n_node_samples < 2 * min_samples_leaf or
weighted_n_node_samples < 2 * min_weight_leaf)

if first:
impurity = splitter.node_impurity()
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -436,11 +436,11 @@ cdef class BestFirstTreeBuilder(TreeBuilder):
impurity = splitter.node_impurity()

n_node_samples = end - start
is_leaf = ((depth > self.max_depth) or
(n_node_samples < self.min_samples_split) or
(n_node_samples < 2 * self.min_samples_leaf) or
(weighted_n_node_samples < self.min_weight_leaf) or
(impurity <= min_impurity_split))
is_leaf = (depth > self.max_depth or
n_node_samples < self.min_samples_split or
n_node_samples < 2 * self.min_samples_leaf or
weighted_n_node_samples < 2 * self.min_weight_leaf or
impurity <= min_impurity_split)

if not is_leaf:
splitter.node_split(impurity, &split, &n_constant_features)
Expand Down