Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

[MRG] DOC: trivial rst fix to whats_new.rst #7511

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 28, 2016

Conversation

GaelVaroquaux
Copy link
Member

Fix for proper rendering

Fix for proper rendering
@GaelVaroquaux GaelVaroquaux added Easy Well-defined and straightforward way to resolve Documentation Waiting for Reviewer labels Sep 28, 2016
@nelson-liu
Copy link
Contributor

lgtm

@TomDLT TomDLT merged commit a545864 into scikit-learn:master Sep 28, 2016
TomDLT pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2016
@TomDLT
Copy link
Member

TomDLT commented Sep 28, 2016

backported

@amueller
Copy link
Member

@TomDLT I think it's better if @ogrisel and me are the only ones backporting, otherwise things can become tricky. I tagged the release yesterday, so this will not make it either way.

@TomDLT
Copy link
Member

TomDLT commented Sep 28, 2016

Fine, sorry for the inconvenience, from now on I'll just suggest it.

@amueller
Copy link
Member

No worries, nothing happened ;)

TomDLT pushed a commit to TomDLT/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2016
amueller added a commit to amueller/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2016
Sundrique pushed a commit to Sundrique/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2017
paulha pushed a commit to paulha/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Documentation Easy Well-defined and straightforward way to resolve Waiting for Reviewer
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants