Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

[MRG] Change deprecation warning for doc_topic_distr from future to present… - #8146

Merged
jnothman merged 3 commits into
scikit-learn:masterfrom
garyForeman:doc_topic_distr_deprecation
Apr 30, 2017
Merged

[MRG] Change deprecation warning for doc_topic_distr from future to present…#8146
jnothman merged 3 commits into
scikit-learn:masterfrom
garyForeman:doc_topic_distr_deprecation

Conversation

@garyForeman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

… tense

Reference Issue

#7992 (comment)

What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.

Clarifies that the doc_topic_distr arguement of the perplexity method is already being ignored as of the version 0.19 release.

Any other comments?

@garyForeman garyForeman changed the title Change deprecation warning for doc_topic_distr from future to present… [MRG] Change deprecation warning for doc_topic_distr from future to present… Jan 2, 2017
Comment thread sklearn/decomposition/online_lda.py Outdated
doc_topic_distr : None or array, shape=(n_samples, n_topics)
Document topic distribution.
If it is None, it will be generated by applying transform on X.
This argument is deprecated and is currenly being ignored.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

currenly -> currently

Comment thread sklearn/decomposition/online_lda.py Outdated
.. versionchanged:: 0.19
*doc_topic_distr* argument has been depricated because user no
longer has access to unnormalized distribution
*doc_topic_distr* argument has been depricated and is ignored

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

depricated -> deprecated

@tguillemot tguillemot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 if we have no other choice.

@naoyak

naoyak commented Apr 30, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Seems like this should go in for 0.19, didn't realize it was still out there. @jnothman ?

@jnothman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM. Thanks for the pink, @naoyak

@jnothman
jnothman merged commit 581e135 into scikit-learn:master Apr 30, 2017
Sundrique pushed a commit to Sundrique/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2017
dmohns pushed a commit to dmohns/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2017
dmohns pushed a commit to dmohns/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2017
NelleV pushed a commit to NelleV/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2017
paulha pushed a commit to paulha/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2017
AishwaryaRK pushed a commit to AishwaryaRK/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2017
maskani-moh pushed a commit to maskani-moh/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2017
jwjohnson314 pushed a commit to jwjohnson314/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants