-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.8k
plot iso-f1 curves in plot_precision_recall #8366
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #8366 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 94.75% 94.75%
=======================================
Files 342 342
Lines 60801 60801
=======================================
Hits 57609 57609
Misses 3192 3192 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I had intended these to appear under the existing plots, not as a new figure.
@@ -127,6 +127,21 @@ | |||
average="micro") | |||
|
|||
|
|||
# Plot ISO-F1 curve |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ISO is international standards organisation. "Iso-" is a greek-derived prefix meaning equal
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
aah yes, will change it!
Also, I think the calls to |
wont the figure become clumsy if we add the iso-f1 curves in the existing plots!?? |
we should try and see. perhaps it's better if they're shaded areas of grey
in the background, but either way they should be visible but out of the way
visually.
…On 17 February 2017 at 01:19, Sachin Agarwal ***@***.***> wrote:
wont the figure become clumsy if we add the iso-f1 curves in the existing
plots!??
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#8366 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAEz68h0EdHTi7o8jzxMDDFrml2zH3BTks5rdFrzgaJpZM4MCUfv>
.
|
i am sorry but it wasn't clear |
try and play around with it.
…On 17 February 2017 at 01:40, Sachin Agarwal ***@***.***> wrote:
i am sorry but it wasn't clear
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#8366 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAEz6707zTwzpkXmugl9e11ElUbcwohXks5rdF_bgaJpZM4MCUfv>
.
|
why closed?
…On 17 Feb 2017 6:28 am, "Sachin Agarwal" ***@***.***> wrote:
Closed #8366 <#8366>.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#8366 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAEz6xKufee5mKwrrGQStKPFTp7EINjsks5rdKNugaJpZM4MCUfv>
.
|
I deleted the branch from my fork by mistake. |
Can you please include a screenshot of the plot in the pull request? |
Yes.. refer to #8378 |
Reference Issue
Fixes #8313
What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.
while plotting PR curves, it separates out the curves with equal f1 values.