Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

[MRG + 1] Fixed impossible min_samples_split value #9520

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 11, 2017
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion doc/modules/ensemble.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ bias. Empirical good default values are ``max_features=n_features``
for regression problems, and ``max_features=sqrt(n_features)`` for
classification tasks (where ``n_features`` is the number of features
in the data). Good results are often achieved when setting ``max_depth=None``
in combination with ``min_samples_split=1`` (i.e., when fully developing the
in combination with ``min_samples_split=2`` (i.e., when fully developing the
trees). Bear in mind though that these values are usually not optimal, and
might result in models that consume a lot of RAM. The best parameter values
should always be cross-validated. In addition, note that in random forests,
Expand Down