Add a benchmark for jsoniter-scala#2
Merged
piotrrzysko merged 1 commit intosimdjson:mainfrom Jul 19, 2023
Merged
Conversation
Member
|
Thanks! I'll try to take a look at this today. |
piotrrzysko
approved these changes
Jul 19, 2023
|
@piotrrzysko Could you update the result in README.md to include jsoniter-scala? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@piotrrzysko Thanks for porting of simdjson to Java!
This PR adds
ParseAndSelectBenchmarkfor jsoniter-scala.Results are quite competitive on my laptop (Intel® Core™ i7-11800H CPU @ 2.3GHz (max 4.6GHz), RAM 64Gb DDR4-3200, Ubuntu 23.04 (Linux 6.2) using OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Temurin-20.0.1+9:
While it doesn't full validation of skipped values according to JSON spec, but it does just enough minimal validation to allow safe skipping of not needed keys and values.