-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 280
NSEM receivers for 2D simulation #1684
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1684 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 81.52% 81.54% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 420 420
Lines 55174 55231 +57
Branches 5254 5271 +17
==========================================
+ Hits 44978 45038 +60
+ Misses 8790 8783 -7
- Partials 1406 1410 +4 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
santisoler
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I left a few minor comments, @dccowan. Please check them out and let me know what do you think.
I see that coverage is missing L782-L783 in receivers.py. Could we add an extra test case to cover that if statement?
Thanks for putting this together!
Co-authored-by: Santiago Soler <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Santiago Soler <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Santiago Soler <[email protected]>
Sure. Before finishing this PR however, I would like have PR #1683 merged. It will make things related to the 2D simulation easier to test. |
I'm not sure these lines are necessary for 3D. I think it may just be for the 3D problem geometry. I noticed the 2D problem geometry for impedance type data doesn't have this functionality. So I've decided to remove these lines. |
Summary
This pull request adds the functionality to simulate and invert admittance and tipper data for 2D problem geometry.
PR Checklist
expect style.
to a Pull Request
@simpeg/simpeg-developerswhen ready for review.What does this implement/fix?
This pull request adds the functionality to simulate and invert admittance and tipper data for 2D problem geometry.