Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Correct comment in RemoteChunkingJobFunctionalTests #4822

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 20, 2025
Merged

Correct comment in RemoteChunkingJobFunctionalTests #4822

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 20, 2025

Conversation

darth-raijin
Copy link
Contributor

Changes:

  • A comment line was unecessarily split, this PR seeks to improve the readability and clean that line comment up

@darth-raijin
Correct line comment
973179e 
Signed-off-by: Mohamed Macow <[email protected]>
@fmbenhassine
Copy link
Contributor

This formatting is done by the spring-javaformat plugin, you can try it with: ./mvnw spring-javaformat:apply.

But we can make that comment more readable with something like:

// the manager sent 2 chunks ({1, 2, 3} and {4, 5, 6}) to workers
assertEquals("Waited for 2 results.", jobExecution.getExitStatus().getExitDescription());

If you update the PR accordingly, it should be good to merge.

@fmbenhassine fmbenhassine added pr-for: enhancement status: waiting-for-reporter Issues for which we are waiting for feedback from the reporter labels Jun 3, 2025
@darth-raijin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Alright, thank you for explaining how the formatting was done!

After the suggested change, we have landed on this:

// then
// the manager sent 2 chunks ({1, 2, 3} and {4, 5, 6}) to workers
assertEquals(ExitStatus.COMPLETED.getExitCode(), jobExecution.getExitStatus().getExitCode());

However it could also look like below, which should be more readable as well, and plays well into the given, when and then

// then the manager sent 2 chunks ({1, 2, 3} and {4, 5, 6}) to workers
assertEquals(ExitStatus.COMPLETED.getExitCode(), jobExecution.getExitStatus().getExitCode());

@fmbenhassine fmbenhassine added status: feedback-provided Issues for which the feedback requested from the reporter was provided and removed status: waiting-for-reporter Issues for which we are waiting for feedback from the reporter labels Jun 4, 2025
@fmbenhassine fmbenhassine merged commit cb4674d into spring-projects:main Jul 20, 2025
1 check passed
@fmbenhassine fmbenhassine changed the title Correct comment in test examples Correct comment in RemoteChunkingJobFunctionalTests Jul 20, 2025
@fmbenhassine fmbenhassine added this to the 6.0.0-M1 milestone Jul 20, 2025
@fmbenhassine fmbenhassine added for: backport-to-5.2.x Issues that will be back-ported to the 5.2.x line and removed status: feedback-provided Issues for which the feedback requested from the reporter was provided labels Jul 20, 2025
fmbenhassine pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2025
@darth-raijin @fmbenhassine
Correct comment in RemoteChunkingJobFunctionalTests (#4822)
6687b06 
Streamline comment to be more readable

Signed-off-by: Mohamed Macow <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit cb4674d)
@fmbenhassine fmbenhassine mentioned this pull request Sep 17, 2025
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
for: backport-to-5.2.x Issues that will be back-ported to the 5.2.x line pr-for: enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
6.0.0-M1
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@darth-raijin @fmbenhassine