Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Update version numbers, v1.1.0 #13

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update version numbers, v1.1.0 #13

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

m-mohr
Copy link
Contributor

@m-mohr m-mohr commented Jun 5, 2025

Proposed Changes:

  1. Update version numbers
  2. Release v1.1.0

Note: There's some weirdness goind on with the version numbers, e.g. for collection-search the version numbers came from the collection search extension, while now I've updated them to follow the versioning of the sort extension, jumping from 1.0.0-rc.1 to 1.1.0 (without a 1.0.0). Similarly, sortables use the version number of OGC API Features right now.

PR Checklist:

  • This PR has no breaking changes.
  • I have added my changes to the CHANGELOG or a CHANGELOG entry is not required.

- **STAC API - Item Search** binding: <https://api.stacspec.org/v1.0.0/item-search#sort>
- **STAC API - Features** binding: <https://api.stacspec.org/v1.0.0/ogcapi-features#sort>
- **STAC API - Collection Search** binding: <https://api.stacspec.org/v1.0.0-rc.1/collection-search#sort>
- **STAC API - Item Search** binding: <https://api.stacspec.org/v1.1.0/item-search#sort>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

😬 I think I understand what's going on here, but it feels so strange to have a https://api.stacspec.org/v1.1.0/item-search when item search itself is still v1.0.0.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, how do we handle this? I think it is correct as it is, just weird that we have extensions of extensions with differing version numbers.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants