Use new shorthand syntax for unwrapping optionals #6329
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
MaxDesiatov
approved these changes
Mar 26, 2023
|
@swift-ci smoke test |
|
thanks @sheikhbayazid |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Use new shorthand syntax for unwrapping optional values
Motivation:
Using new shorthand syntax would make the code easier to read. Since we have the support to add the shorthand syntax for
guard letandif let, it makes the code more readable.Modifications:
Instead of using
if let value = value, usedif let valuesame goes forguard let.Result:
There is no change of any logic. Just improved the better syntax of unwrapping optionals.