Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

matyhtf
Copy link
Member

@matyhtf matyhtf commented Oct 9, 2025

Reduce the number of methods. Only lock() and unlock() methods are reserved. The interface design is the same as that of the flock

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 9, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 87.50000% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 86.20%. Comparing base (bc4bb65) to head (4135cf1).
⚠️ Report is 7 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/lock/rw_lock.cc 73.07% 7 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5879      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   86.16%   86.20%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         109      109              
  Lines       16844    16949     +105     
  Branches     2977     3035      +58     
==========================================
+ Hits        14513    14611      +98     
- Misses       2331     2338       +7     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@matyhtf matyhtf merged commit d25bd6d into master Oct 9, 2025
72 of 94 checks passed
@matyhtf matyhtf deleted the refactor-lock branch October 9, 2025 11:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant