Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Fix missing abstract key in XmlDumper #22901

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 25, 2017

Conversation

weaverryan
Copy link
Member

@weaverryan weaverryan commented May 25, 2017

Q A
Branch? 2.7
Bug fix? yes
New feature? no
BC breaks? no
Deprecations? no
Tests pass? yes
Fixed tickets none
License MIT
Doc PR n/a

Unless I'm missing something, the abstract key was missing in the XmlDumper. I noticed it when using debug:container some_abstract_service and was seeing "no" for abstract.

When this merges to 3.3, the services-abstract.xml will need to change to this:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<container xmlns="http://symfony.com/schema/dic/services" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://symfony.com/schema/dic/services http://symfony.com/schema/dic/services/services-1.0.xsd">
  <services>
    <service id="service_container" class="Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\ContainerInterface" synthetic="true"/>
    <service id="foo" class="Foo" abstract="true"/>
    <service id="Psr\Container\ContainerInterface" alias="service_container" public="false"/>
    <service id="Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\ContainerInterface" alias="service_container" public="false"/>
  </services>
</container>

@nicolas-grekas nicolas-grekas added this to the 2.7 milestone May 25, 2017
Copy link
Member

@nicolas-grekas nicolas-grekas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Copy link
Member

@xabbuh xabbuh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 (I don't like the services<number> naming, but the change itself looks good)

@weaverryan
Copy link
Member Author

@xabbuh yea, me either :). I've renamed it!

Caused mis-reporting of abstract key (always no) in debug:container
@weaverryan weaverryan force-pushed the fix-abstract-xml-dumper branch from ad81c6e to 40f60ec Compare May 25, 2017 12:56
@fabpot
Copy link
Member

fabpot commented May 25, 2017

Thank you @weaverryan.

@fabpot fabpot merged commit 40f60ec into symfony:2.7 May 25, 2017
fabpot added a commit that referenced this pull request May 25, 2017
This PR was merged into the 2.7 branch.

Discussion
----------

Fix missing abstract key in XmlDumper

| Q             | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch?       | 2.7
| Bug fix?      | yes
| New feature?  | no
| BC breaks?    | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass?   | yes
| Fixed tickets | none
| License       | MIT
| Doc PR        | n/a

Unless I'm missing something, the abstract key was missing in the XmlDumper. I noticed it when using `debug:container some_abstract_service` and was seeing "no" for abstract.

When this merges to 3.3, the `services-abstract.xml` will need to change to this:

```xml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<container xmlns="http://symfony.com/schema/dic/services" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://symfony.com/schema/dic/services http://symfony.com/schema/dic/services/services-1.0.xsd">
  <services>
    <service id="service_container" class="Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\ContainerInterface" synthetic="true"/>
    <service id="foo" class="Foo" abstract="true"/>
    <service id="Psr\Container\ContainerInterface" alias="service_container" public="false"/>
    <service id="Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\ContainerInterface" alias="service_container" public="false"/>
  </services>
</container>
```

Commits
-------

40f60ec Fixing missing abstract attribute in XmlDumper
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants