Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

[DI] never inline lazy services #27366

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 25, 2018

Conversation

nicolas-grekas
Copy link
Member

@nicolas-grekas nicolas-grekas commented May 24, 2018

Q A
Branch? 2.7
Bug fix? yes
New feature? no
BC breaks? no
Deprecations? no
Tests pass? no
Fixed tickets -
License MIT
Doc PR -

Should apply also:

  • to deprecated services since 2.8
  • to errored services since 3.4

@stof
Copy link
Member

stof commented May 24, 2018

this is to ensure that the special logic running in the factory method can always be called, right ?

@nicolas-grekas
Copy link
Member Author

this is to ensure that the special logic running in the factory method can always be called, right ?

exactly yes

@nicolas-grekas nicolas-grekas merged commit 3b4d7ab into symfony:2.8 May 25, 2018
nicolas-grekas added a commit that referenced this pull request May 25, 2018
This PR was merged into the 2.8 branch.

Discussion
----------

[DI] never inline lazy services

| Q             | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch?       | 2.7
| Bug fix?      | yes
| New feature?  | no
| BC breaks?    | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass?   | no
| Fixed tickets | -
| License       | MIT
| Doc PR        | -

Should apply also:
- to deprecated services since 2.8
- to errored services since 3.4

Commits
-------

3b4d7ab [DI] never inline lazy services
@nicolas-grekas nicolas-grekas deleted the di-lazy-proto branch May 25, 2018 14:39
@fabpot fabpot mentioned this pull request May 26, 2018
This was referenced Jun 25, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants