-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.6k
Remove UPGRADE-5.4.md #44489
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove UPGRADE-5.4.md #44489
Conversation
fancyweb
commented
Dec 7, 2021
Q | A |
---|---|
Branch? | 6.0 |
Bug fix? | no |
New feature? | no |
Deprecations? | no |
Tickets | - |
License | MIT |
Doc PR | - |
UPGRADE-6.0.md
Outdated
@@ -173,6 +173,7 @@ Messenger | |||
* Removed the `prefetch_count` parameter in the AMQP bridge. | |||
* Removed the use of TLS option for Redis Bridge, use `rediss://127.0.0.1` instead of `redis://127.0.0.1?tls=1` | |||
* The `delete_after_ack` config option of the Redis transport now defaults to `true` | |||
* The `reset_on_message` config option now defaults to `true` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This line is in branch 5.4 but not in 6.0, both files should logically be the same.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh probably because it's a FWB config and not related to the Messenger component? So it should be removed in 5.4 instead?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
see #43203
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It needs to be removed on 5.4 then.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done in #44496
e1c7982
to
ff68d01
Compare
ff68d01
to
4af20e4
Compare
Thanks @fancyweb. |