Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

fixed bug with return-path #45545

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

fixed bug with return-path #45545

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

peteruu
Copy link

@peteruu peteruu commented Feb 24, 2022

mailer info was ignoring return-path setting more info here #41322

Q A
Branch? 5.4
Bug fix? yes
New feature? no
Deprecations? no
Tickets Fix #41322
License MIT
Doc PR symfony/symfony-docs#

mailer info was ignoring return-path setting more info here symfony#41322
@carsonbot
Copy link

Hey!

I see that this is your first PR. That is great! Welcome!

Symfony has a contribution guide which I suggest you to read.

In short:

  • Always add tests
  • Keep backward compatibility (see https://symfony.com/bc).
  • Bug fixes must be submitted against the lowest maintained branch where they apply (see https://symfony.com/releases)
  • Features and deprecations must be submitted against the 6.1 branch.

Review the GitHub status checks of your pull request and try to solve the reported issues. If some tests are failing, try to see if they are failing because of this change.

When two Symfony core team members approve this change, it will be merged and you will become an official Symfony contributor!
If this PR is merged in a lower version branch, it will be merged up to all maintained branches within a few days.

I am going to sit back now and wait for the reviews.

Cheers!

Carsonbot

@fabpot
Copy link
Member

fabpot commented Feb 25, 2022

The change has been done on purpose, see #37888 for the explanation.

@fabpot fabpot closed this Feb 25, 2022
@cscrewsandcaptains
Copy link

I'm sorry, but I don't understand why in #37888 this change is made. What is wrong with setting the sender via the return path if it is set? Btw other mailers do it this way.

@cscrewsandcaptains
Copy link

In my opinion this will be correct -- first: "sender", second: "return-path", last: "from"

private static function getSenderFromHeaders(Headers $headers): Address
    {
        if ($sender = $headers->get('Sender')) {
            return $sender->getAddress();
        }
        
        if ($return = $headers->get('Return-Path')) {
            return $return->getAddress();
        }
        
        if ($from = $headers->get('From')) {
            return $from->getAddresses()[0];
        }

        throw new LogicException('Unable to determine the sender of the message.');
    }

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants