Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

[Form] ignore missing keys when mapping DateTime objects to uninitialized arrays #47200

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 5, 2022

Conversation

xabbuh
Copy link
Member

@xabbuh xabbuh commented Aug 5, 2022

Q A
Branch? 4.4
Bug fix? yes
New feature? no
Deprecations? no
Tickets Fix #47151
License MIT
Doc PR

@xabbuh xabbuh force-pushed the issue-47151 branch 2 times, most recently from eeaedb0 to 6d79f68 Compare August 5, 2022 12:08
@xabbuh xabbuh changed the title [Form] do not fail when mapping DateTime objects to uninitialized arrays [Form] ignore missing keys when mapping DateTime objects to uninitialized arrays Aug 5, 2022
@fabpot
Copy link
Member

fabpot commented Aug 5, 2022

Thank you @xabbuh.

@fabpot fabpot merged commit a08fd86 into symfony:4.4 Aug 5, 2022
@xabbuh xabbuh deleted the issue-47151 branch August 5, 2022 12:47
fabpot added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2022
… to uninitialized arrrays (xabbuh)

This PR was merged into the 5.4 branch.

Discussion
----------

[Form] ignore missing keys when mapping DateTime objects to uninitialized arrrays

| Q             | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch?       | 5.4
| Bug fix?      | no
| New feature?  | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tickets       |
| License       | MIT
| Doc PR        |

continues #47200 after merging changes up into the `5.4` branch

Commits
-------

6ce5d52 ignore missing keys when mapping DateTime objects to uninitialized arrays
@fabpot fabpot mentioned this pull request Sep 30, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants