Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

[RateLimiter] add the ability to use a Clock inside the RateLimiter #49222

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
xabbuh wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[RateLimiter] add the ability to use a Clock inside the RateLimiter #49222

xabbuh wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@xabbuh
Copy link
Member

@xabbuh xabbuh commented Feb 3, 2023 •
edited by yceruto
Loading

Q A
Branch? 7.2
Bug fix? no
New feature? yes
Deprecations? no
Tickets Fix #47999
License MIT
Doc PR

@carsonbot carsonbot added this to the 6.3 milestone Feb 3, 2023
stof
stof reviewed Feb 3, 2023
View reviewed changes
nicolas-grekas
nicolas-grekas reviewed Feb 6, 2023
View reviewed changes
@xabbuh xabbuh force-pushed the issue-47999 branch 4 times, most recently from b4b0904 to c1b4bde Compare February 7, 2023 15:24
@nicolas-grekas
Copy link
Member

nicolas-grekas commented Feb 13, 2023

As discussed on Slack some classes are meant to be serialized (Window, SlidingWindow, TokenBucket, maybe others).
We need to figure out a way to use the current clock for them.
I think this means we shouldn't change their constructor but instead add and use a withClock method.
WDYT?

@nicolas-grekas nicolas-grekas modified the milestones: 6.3, 6.4 May 23, 2023
@nicolas-grekas nicolas-grekas modified the milestones: 6.4, 7.1 Nov 15, 2023
@fabpot
Copy link
Member

fabpot commented Feb 6, 2024

@nicolas-grekas @xabbuh What are the next steps here?

@xabbuh xabbuh modified the milestones: 7.1, 7.2 Apr 25, 2024
@xabbuh xabbuh force-pushed the issue-47999 branch 2 times, most recently from d854101 to a7af865 Compare July 30, 2024 09:44
@xabbuh xabbuh force-pushed the issue-47999 branch 2 times, most recently from caefae2 to 85a6a5d Compare July 30, 2024 11:36
@xabbuh
Copy link
Member Author

xabbuh commented Jul 30, 2024

I have updated the PR to explicitly set the clock for LimiterStateInterface implementations after they have been unserialised. It's ready from my side.

reviews welcome

stof
stof reviewed Jul 30, 2024
View reviewed changes
stof
stof reviewed Jul 30, 2024
View reviewed changes
@OskarStark OskarStark changed the title [RateLimiter] add the ability to use a Clock inside the RateLimiter [RateLimiter] add the ability to use a Clock inside the RateLimiter Jul 30, 2024
nicolas-grekas
nicolas-grekas requested changes Aug 22, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@nicolas-grekas nicolas-grekas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this PR should be revised with this in mind: value objects should remain free from services.
Putting a clock service in a CacheStorage doesn't make sense to me.
e.g. for the Window class, there's already a way to define the current time: always pass $now to the add() method.
This logic should be applied to challenge all added clock services, so that we add it only to services.

@fabpot fabpot modified the milestones: 7.2, 7.3 Nov 20, 2024
@fabpot fabpot modified the milestones: 7.3, 7.4 May 26, 2025
@nicolas-grekas
Copy link
Member

nicolas-grekas commented Oct 26, 2025

Let me close as stalled. If anyone wants this to happen, my last comment could help.

@xabbuh xabbuh deleted the issue-47999 branch October 26, 2025 14:19
@xabbuh xabbuh mentioned this pull request Dec 2, 2025
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@stof stof stof left review comments

@nicolas-grekas nicolas-grekas nicolas-grekas requested changes

@OskarStark OskarStark OskarStark approved these changes

@wouterj wouterj Awaiting requested review from wouterj

@chalasr chalasr Awaiting requested review from chalasr

+2 more reviewers

@maxbeckers maxbeckers maxbeckers left review comments

@evertharmeling evertharmeling evertharmeling requested changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

Feature RateLimiter Status: Needs Work

Projects

None yet

Milestone

7.4

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[RateLimiter] Make time dependency explicit and mockable

8 participants

@xabbuh @nicolas-grekas @fabpot @evertharmeling @stof @OskarStark @maxbeckers @carsonbot