I'm wondering about naming these workflow.asyncio_wait() andworkflow.asyncio_as_completed().

The main reason is that workflow.wait() will be confused with workflow.wait_condition(). It may just be a hiccup that they'll get over, but it would be nice not to cause users that hiccup.

Another reason is that workflow.asyncio_xxx() is just directly saying exactly what it is: a shim that is basically exactly the same as the utility from asyncio. It makes it clear that they are utilities for dealing with arbitrary tasks/coroutines rather than being a special sort of as_completed or wait that has to do with waiting or completing Temporal-specific entities.

I considered it, but we don't have asyncio_sleep, just sleep. I think these don't need to necessarily be seen as asyncio utilities, they can be seen as workflow utilities that just so happen to be in asyncio as well. I think they work well as workflow utilities just like wait_condition. (same for uuid4() and time() and random() and other Python copies we don't prefix with their originating module name + _)

I considered it, but we don't have asyncio_sleep, just sleep

I don't really see the analogy there: we don't have workflow.sleep(), instead users just use asyncio.sleep(). Here, users would call asyncio.xxx() but they shouldn't, so we point them to workflow.asyncio_xxx().

workflow.wait_condition() is an extremely important API and I really worry that introducing workflow.wait() will confuse users and damage DX. It's a very similar name to workflow.Await() / Workflow.await() that users may have come across in the Go and Java SDKs, and IDEs will offer it first when users are exploring the workflow namespace. I'd like to wait for other team opinions on this.

I don't really see the analogy there

Sorry, correct, I was thinking of other SDKs that do have sleep and don't prefix it. In Python we are able to reuse sleep. We do have time(), time_ns(), random(), and uuid4() though that are copies of other Python module functions and we don't prefix those.

workflow.wait_condition() is an extremely important API and I really worry that introducing workflow.wait() will confuse users and damage DX

Python has wait and wait_for which are different things too and if they can expect users to understand the difference I think we can too.

I'd like to wait for other team opinions on this

👍