-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 123
User metadata #1657
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
User metadata #1657
Conversation
…es field to add a summary to an activity
* General fixed details for this workflow execution that may appear in UI/CLI. | ||
* This can be in Temporal markdown format and can span multiple lines. | ||
* | ||
* @experimental |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please add a short comment on all @experimental
tags (see what we did elsewhere). Benefit isn't huge, but at least, it identifies which "feature" the experimental API is linked with.
@@ -240,6 +245,7 @@ export async function encodeScheduleAction( | |||
action: CompiledScheduleAction, | |||
headers: Headers | |||
): Promise<temporal.api.schedule.v1.IScheduleAction> { | |||
const jsonConverter = new JsonPayloadConverter(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Use the data converters configured on the client (i.e. custom payload converter and codec).
@@ -312,6 +322,8 @@ export async function decodeScheduleAction( | |||
pb: temporal.api.schedule.v1.IScheduleAction | |||
): Promise<ScheduleDescriptionAction> { | |||
if (pb.startWorkflow) { | |||
const jsonConverter = new JsonPayloadConverter(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Use the data converters configured on the client (i.e. custom payload converter and codec).
@@ -1196,6 +1197,7 @@ export class WorkflowClient extends BaseClient { | |||
protected async _signalWithStartWorkflowHandler(input: WorkflowSignalWithStartInput): Promise<string> { | |||
const { identity } = this.options; | |||
const { options, workflowType, signalName, signalArgs, headers } = input; | |||
const jsonConverter = new JsonPayloadConverter(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Use the data converters configured on the client (i.e. custom payload converter and codec).
@@ -1225,6 +1227,10 @@ export class WorkflowClient extends BaseClient { | |||
: undefined, | |||
cronSchedule: options.cronSchedule, | |||
header: { fields: headers }, | |||
userMetadata: { | |||
summary: jsonConverter.toPayload(options?.staticSummary), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You will need to use await encodeToPayload(...)
instead here and everything else in the client package. Not in Workflows and Worker, though.
return undefined; | ||
} | ||
|
||
const jsonConverter = new JsonPayloadConverter(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Don't create a JSON payload converter. Use the payload converter from the activator.
@@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ export interface ActivityInput { | |||
readonly options: ActivityOptions; | |||
readonly headers: Headers; | |||
readonly seq: number; | |||
readonly cmdOpts?: WorkflowCommandOptions; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think we should have this WorkflowCommandOptions
type. I even wonder if we should inline summary
and details
directly in ActivityInput
(without the extra UserMetadata
nesting). Or add these two to ActivityOptions
, though that might pose some minor challenge regarding the type provided to the proxyActivities()
function.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What did we do in other SDKs?
*/ | ||
export function sleep(ms: Duration): Promise<void> { | ||
export function sleep(ms: Duration, summary?: string): Promise<void> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm worried this will evolve badly. What if we then need to add description
, and then other properties? Instead, I think I'd define a TimerOptions
type, and take this as a second argument here. Then, we can easily add whatever properties we need.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Out of curiosity, what do we do in other SDKs?
activityType: string, | ||
args: any[], | ||
options: ActivityOptions, | ||
summary?: string |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah… So, looking at this one, I really feel this should be part of ActivityOptions
.
* @param summaries Record mapping activity names to their summary descriptions | ||
* @returns A new proxy with the provided summaries | ||
*/ | ||
withSummaries(summaries: Record<string, string>): ActivityInterfaceFor<A>; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🤔 That feels a bit awkward, and would prevent having an activity named withSummaries
(ok, that's arguably very unlikely, but still means this approach would evolve badly).
I think we could get a better DX by using something similar to this, but at the activity-level rather than at the activities-level (mind the plural). That would also allow any extra option to be set at the call site, which is a recurring request.
For example, we could have:
const { echo } = proxyActivities<MyActivities>({ startToCloseTimeout: '5m' });
// No extra options
await echo(myArg1, myArg2);
// With extra options, higher order function style
await echo.withOptions({ summary: "..." })(myArg1, myArg2);
// Some other possible variants to be considered
await echo.withOptions({ summary: "..." }, myArg1, myArg2);
await echo.withOptions({ summary: "..." }, [myArg1, myArg2]);
I'll let you think you a bit about this, but we should probably include others in this discussion.
What was changed
Added functionality for users to provide
staticDetails
andstaticSummary
metadata to workflow start commands.These can be retrieved via
describe
on the workflow handler and are visibile via the UI/CLI.Users can set
currentDetails
- a mutable details string within the workflow - viaSetCurrentDetails
and retrieve it viaGetCurrentDetails
. This is visible via the UI/CLI and the__temporal_workflow_metadata
internal query.Users can add a
summary
(short string description) when setting a timer and when starting an activity.Closes [Feature Request] Support user metadata #1544
How was this tested:
Couple integration tests
Any docs updates needed?
Maybe