Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

nyanp
Copy link
Member

@nyanp nyanp commented Oct 20, 2016

This is mainly for providing backward compatibility to v0.1.1.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 68.272% when pulling 6f4230b on feat/double-precision into 48005de on master.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 68.272% when pulling 6f4230b on feat/double-precision into 48005de on master.

Copy link
Member

@edgarriba edgarriba left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nyanp should we reshape the travis matrix to give support to double precision?

@nyanp
Copy link
Member Author

nyanp commented Oct 23, 2016

@edgarriba
Not required I think, but it's valuable to keep consistent coding style. I've added now.

EDIT: Oh Travis detected a compilation error. You are right, thx 😜

@nyanp nyanp merged commit 10a0271 into master Oct 26, 2016
@nyanp nyanp deleted the feat/double-precision branch October 26, 2016 22:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants