feat: support babashka except in print #20
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Closed
Owner
|
Thank you! Released 1.7.0 |
Contributor
Author
|
Thank you for the wonderful libs! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
After babashka/babashka#1871, babashka/babashka#1870, and babashka/babashka#1869, it wasn't very hard to support Babashka for most namespaces in this repo.
clojure+.printwas the exception, as you can see in bd6a9b6. That one would require a lot of changes, which I don't feel it's worth it.The changes in
clojure+.walk-testare due to babashka/babashka#1868 though, and the lack of.comparator.Supersedes #19
Fix babashka/babashka#1853