Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

Cypresslin
Copy link
Contributor

Typo correction for hotpluggable_offline_memory() function.
Check for hot-pluggable memory availability in prerequisite().
Check for precentage range for -r flag.

Fix the memory offline test, the $ratio was used with RANDOM as the
possibility to get it offlined, correct it to become the portion of
available removable memory blocks.
Also ask the tool to try to offline the next available memory block
if the attempt is unsuccessful. It will only fail if all removable
memory blocks are busy.

An nice example:
k@Latitude:$ sudo ./test.sh
Test scope: 10% hotplug memory
online all hot-pluggable memory in offline state:
SKIPPED - no hot-pluggable memory in offline state
offline 10% hot-pluggable memory in online state
trying to offline 3 out of 28 memory block(s):
online->offline memory1
online->offline memory10
./test.sh: line 74: echo: write error: Resource temporarily unavailable
offline_memory_expect_success 10: unexpected fail
online->offline memory100
online->offline memory101
online all hot-pluggable memory in offline state:
offline->online memory1
offline->online memory100
offline->online memory101
skip extra tests: debugfs is not mounted
k@Latitude:
$ echo $?
0

Signed-off-by: Po-Hsu Lin [email protected]

Typo correction for hotpluggable_offline_memory() function.
Check for hot-pluggable memory availability in prerequisite().
Check for precentage range for -r flag.

Fix the memory offline test, the $ratio was used with RANDOM as the
possibility to get it offlined, correct it to become the portion of
available removable memory blocks.
Also ask the tool to try to offline the next available memory block
if the attempt is unsuccessful. It will only fail if all removable
memory blocks are busy.

An nice example:
k@Latitude:~$ sudo ./test.sh
Test scope: 10% hotplug memory
	 online all hot-pluggable memory in offline state:
		SKIPPED - no hot-pluggable memory in offline state
	 offline 10% hot-pluggable memory in online state
	 trying to offline 3 out of 28 memory block(s):
online->offline memory1
online->offline memory10
./test.sh: line 74: echo: write error: Resource temporarily unavailable
offline_memory_expect_success 10: unexpected fail
online->offline memory100
online->offline memory101
	 online all hot-pluggable memory in offline state:
offline->online memory1
offline->online memory100
offline->online memory101
skip extra tests: debugfs is not mounted
k@Latitude:~$ echo $?
0

Signed-off-by: Po-Hsu Lin <[email protected]>
@Cypresslin Cypresslin closed this Jun 16, 2017
fengguang pushed a commit to 0day-ci/linux that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2017
The driver expects to use hardware IRQ numbers 1 through 4 for INTX
interrupts, but only creates an IRQ domain of size 4 (ie. IRQ numbers 0
through 3). This results in a warning from irq_domain_associate when it
is called with hwirq=4:

     WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:365
         irq_domain_associate+0x170/0x220
     error: hwirq 0x4 is too large for dummy
     Modules linked in:
     CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G        W
         4.12.0-rc5-00126-g19e1b3a10aad-dirty torvalds#427
     Stack : 0000000000000000 0000000000000004 0000000000000006 ffffffff8092c78a
             0000000000000061 ffffffff8018bf60 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
             ffffffff8088c287 ffffffff80811d18 a8000000ffc60000 ffffffff80926678
             0000000000000001 0000000000000000 ffffffff80887880 ffffffff80960000
             ffffffff80920000 ffffffff801e6744 ffffffff80887880 a8000000ffc4f8f8
             000000000000089c ffffffff8018d260 0000000000010000 ffffffff80811d18
             0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
             0000000000000000 a8000000ffc4f840 0000000000000000 ffffffff8042cf34
             0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000040c00
             0000000000000000 ffffffff8010d1c8 0000000000000000 ffffffff8042cf34
             ...
     Call Trace:
     [<ffffffff8010d1c8>] show_stack+0x80/0xa0
     [<ffffffff8042cf34>] dump_stack+0xd4/0x110
     [<ffffffff8013ea98>] __warn+0xf0/0x108
     [<ffffffff8013eb14>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x3c/0x48
     [<ffffffff80196528>] irq_domain_associate+0x170/0x220
     [<ffffffff80196bf0>] irq_create_mapping+0x88/0x118
     [<ffffffff801976a8>] irq_create_fwspec_mapping+0xb8/0x320
     [<ffffffff80197970>] irq_create_of_mapping+0x60/0x70
     [<ffffffff805d1318>] of_irq_parse_and_map_pci+0x20/0x38
     [<ffffffff8049c210>] pci_fixup_irqs+0x60/0xe0
     [<ffffffff8049cd64>] xilinx_pcie_probe+0x28c/0x478
     [<ffffffff804e8ca8>] platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xd0
     [<ffffffff804e73a4>] driver_probe_device+0x2c4/0x3a0
     [<ffffffff804e7544>] __driver_attach+0xc4/0xd0
     [<ffffffff804e5254>] bus_for_each_dev+0x64/0xa8
     [<ffffffff804e5e40>] bus_add_driver+0x1f0/0x268
     [<ffffffff804e8000>] driver_register+0x68/0x118
     [<ffffffff801001a4>] do_one_initcall+0x4c/0x178
     [<ffffffff808d3ca8>] kernel_init_freeable+0x204/0x2b0
     [<ffffffff80730b68>] kernel_init+0x10/0xf8
     [<ffffffff80106218>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c

This patch avoids that warning by creating the legacy IRQ domain with
size 5 rather than 4, allowing it to cover the hwirq=4/INTD case.

Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <[email protected]>
Cc: Bharat Kumar Gogada <[email protected]>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
Cc: Michal Simek <[email protected]>
Cc: Ravikiran Gummaluri <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
fengguang pushed a commit to 0day-ci/linux that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2017
The pcie-xilinx driver creates an IRQ domain of size 4 for legacy PCI
INTx interrupts, which at first glance seems reasonable since there are
4 possible such interrupts. Unfortunately the driver then proceeds to
use the range 1-4 as the hwirq numbers for INTA-INTD, causing warnings &
broken interrupts when attempting to use INTD/hwirq=4 due to it being
beyond the range of the IRQ domain:

  WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:365
      irq_domain_associate+0x170/0x220
  error: hwirq 0x4 is too large for dummy
  Modules linked in:
  CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G        W
      4.12.0-rc5-00126-g19e1b3a10aad-dirty torvalds#427
  Stack : 0000000000000000 0000000000000004 0000000000000006 ffffffff8092c78a
          0000000000000061 ffffffff8018bf60 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
          ffffffff8088c287 ffffffff80811d18 a8000000ffc60000 ffffffff80926678
          0000000000000001 0000000000000000 ffffffff80887880 ffffffff80960000
          ffffffff80920000 ffffffff801e6744 ffffffff80887880 a8000000ffc4f8f8
          000000000000089c ffffffff8018d260 0000000000010000 ffffffff80811d18
          0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
          0000000000000000 a8000000ffc4f840 0000000000000000 ffffffff8042cf34
          0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000040c00
          0000000000000000 ffffffff8010d1c8 0000000000000000 ffffffff8042cf34
          ...
  Call Trace:
  [<ffffffff8010d1c8>] show_stack+0x80/0xa0
  [<ffffffff8042cf34>] dump_stack+0xd4/0x110
  [<ffffffff8013ea98>] __warn+0xf0/0x108
  [<ffffffff8013eb14>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x3c/0x48
  [<ffffffff80196528>] irq_domain_associate+0x170/0x220
  [<ffffffff80196bf0>] irq_create_mapping+0x88/0x118
  [<ffffffff801976a8>] irq_create_fwspec_mapping+0xb8/0x320
  [<ffffffff80197970>] irq_create_of_mapping+0x60/0x70
  [<ffffffff805d1318>] of_irq_parse_and_map_pci+0x20/0x38
  [<ffffffff8049c210>] pci_fixup_irqs+0x60/0xe0
  [<ffffffff8049cd64>] xilinx_pcie_probe+0x28c/0x478
  [<ffffffff804e8ca8>] platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xd0
  [<ffffffff804e73a4>] driver_probe_device+0x2c4/0x3a0
  [<ffffffff804e7544>] __driver_attach+0xc4/0xd0
  [<ffffffff804e5254>] bus_for_each_dev+0x64/0xa8
  [<ffffffff804e5e40>] bus_add_driver+0x1f0/0x268
  [<ffffffff804e8000>] driver_register+0x68/0x118
  [<ffffffff801001a4>] do_one_initcall+0x4c/0x178
  [<ffffffff808d3ca8>] kernel_init_freeable+0x204/0x2b0
  [<ffffffff80730b68>] kernel_init+0x10/0xf8
  [<ffffffff80106218>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c

Fix this by making use of the new pci_irqd_intx_xlate() helper to
translate the INTx 1-4 range into the 0-3 range suitable for the IRQ
domain of size 4, and stop adding 1 to the hwirq number decoded from the
interrupt FIFO which is already in the range 0-3.

Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <[email protected]>
Cc: Bharat Kumar Gogada <[email protected]>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
Cc: Michal Simek <[email protected]>
Cc: Ravikiran Gummaluri <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
fengguang pushed a commit to 0day-ci/linux that referenced this pull request Aug 23, 2017
The pcie-xilinx driver creates an IRQ domain of size 4 for legacy PCI INTx
interrupts, which at first glance seems reasonable since there are 4
possible such interrupts. Unfortunately the driver then proceeds to use the
range 1-4 as the hwirq numbers for INTA-INTD, causing warnings & broken
interrupts when attempting to use INTD/hwirq=4 due to it being beyond the
range of the IRQ domain:

  WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:365
      irq_domain_associate+0x170/0x220
  error: hwirq 0x4 is too large for dummy
  Modules linked in:
  CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G        W
      4.12.0-rc5-00126-g19e1b3a10aad-dirty torvalds#427
  Stack : 0000000000000000 0000000000000004 0000000000000006 ffffffff8092c78a
          0000000000000061 ffffffff8018bf60 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
          ffffffff8088c287 ffffffff80811d18 a8000000ffc60000 ffffffff80926678
          0000000000000001 0000000000000000 ffffffff80887880 ffffffff80960000
          ffffffff80920000 ffffffff801e6744 ffffffff80887880 a8000000ffc4f8f8
          000000000000089c ffffffff8018d260 0000000000010000 ffffffff80811d18
          0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
          0000000000000000 a8000000ffc4f840 0000000000000000 ffffffff8042cf34
          0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000040c00
          0000000000000000 ffffffff8010d1c8 0000000000000000 ffffffff8042cf34
          ...
  Call Trace:
  [<ffffffff8010d1c8>] show_stack+0x80/0xa0
  [<ffffffff8042cf34>] dump_stack+0xd4/0x110
  [<ffffffff8013ea98>] __warn+0xf0/0x108
  [<ffffffff8013eb14>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x3c/0x48
  [<ffffffff80196528>] irq_domain_associate+0x170/0x220
  [<ffffffff80196bf0>] irq_create_mapping+0x88/0x118
  [<ffffffff801976a8>] irq_create_fwspec_mapping+0xb8/0x320
  [<ffffffff80197970>] irq_create_of_mapping+0x60/0x70
  [<ffffffff805d1318>] of_irq_parse_and_map_pci+0x20/0x38
  [<ffffffff8049c210>] pci_fixup_irqs+0x60/0xe0
  [<ffffffff8049cd64>] xilinx_pcie_probe+0x28c/0x478
  [<ffffffff804e8ca8>] platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xd0
  [<ffffffff804e73a4>] driver_probe_device+0x2c4/0x3a0
  [<ffffffff804e7544>] __driver_attach+0xc4/0xd0
  [<ffffffff804e5254>] bus_for_each_dev+0x64/0xa8
  [<ffffffff804e5e40>] bus_add_driver+0x1f0/0x268
  [<ffffffff804e8000>] driver_register+0x68/0x118
  [<ffffffff801001a4>] do_one_initcall+0x4c/0x178
  [<ffffffff808d3ca8>] kernel_init_freeable+0x204/0x2b0
  [<ffffffff80730b68>] kernel_init+0x10/0xf8
  [<ffffffff80106218>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c

Fix this by making use of the new pci_irqd_intx_xlate() helper to translate
the INTx 1-4 range into the 0-3 range suitable for the IRQ domain of size
4, and stop adding 1 to the hwirq number decoded from the interrupt FIFO
which is already in the range 0-3.

Whilst we're here we switch to using PCI_NUM_INTX rather than the magic
number 4, making it clearer what the 4 means.

Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
Cc: Bharat Kumar Gogada <[email protected]>
Cc: Michal Simek <[email protected]>
Cc: Ravikiran Gummaluri <[email protected]>
Mic92 pushed a commit to Mic92/linux that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2019
cptofs: Don't overwrite failure with umount return value
metux added a commit to metux/linux that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2019
Fix checkpatch warnings:

    WARNING: line over 80 characters
    torvalds#9: FILE: drivers/tty/serial/apbuart.c:9:
    + *  Copyright (C) 2006 Daniel Hellstrom <[email protected]>, Aeroflex Gaisler AB

    WARNING: line over 80 characters
    torvalds#11: FILE: drivers/tty/serial/apbuart.c:11:
    + *  Copyright (C) 2009 Kristoffer Glembo <[email protected]>, Aeroflex Gaisler AB

    WARNING: line over 80 characters
    torvalds#16: FILE: drivers/tty/serial/apbuart.c:16:
    +#if defined(CONFIG_SERIAL_GRLIB_GAISLER_APBUART_CONSOLE) && defined(CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ)

    WARNING: labels should not be indented
    torvalds#122: FILE: drivers/tty/serial/apbuart.c:122:
    +	      ignore_char:

    WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
    torvalds#186: FILE: drivers/tty/serial/apbuart.c:186:
    +	unsigned int status = UART_GET_STATUS(port);
    +	return status & UART_STATUS_THE ? TIOCSER_TEMT : 0;

    WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
    torvalds#322: FILE: drivers/tty/serial/apbuart.c:322:
    +	int ret = 0;
    +	if (ser->type != PORT_UNKNOWN && ser->type != PORT_APBUART)

    WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
    torvalds#427: FILE: drivers/tty/serial/apbuart.c:427:
    +	unsigned int status;
    +	do {

    WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
    torvalds#463: FILE: drivers/tty/serial/apbuart.c:463:
    +		unsigned int quot, status;
    +		status = UART_GET_STATUS(port);

    WARNING: line over 80 characters
    torvalds#627: FILE: drivers/tty/serial/apbuart.c:627:
    +		port->membase = ioremap(addr, sizeof(struct grlib_apbuart_regs_map));

    WARNING: line over 80 characters
    torvalds#634: FILE: drivers/tty/serial/apbuart.c:634:
    +		port->fifosize = apbuart_scan_fifo_size((struct uart_port *) port, line);

Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt <[email protected]>
fengguang pushed a commit to 0day-ci/linux that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2019
I got a UAF repport in tun driver when doing fuzzy test:

[  466.269490] ==================================================================
[  466.271792] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in tun_chr_read_iter+0x2ca/0x2d0
[  466.271806] Read of size 8 at addr ffff888372139250 by task tun-test/2699
[  466.271810]
[  466.271824] CPU: 1 PID: 2699 Comm: tun-test Not tainted 5.3.0-rc1-00001-g5a9433db2614-dirty torvalds#427
[  466.271833] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.1-0-ga5cab58e9a3f-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[  466.271838] Call Trace:
[  466.271858]  dump_stack+0xca/0x13e
[  466.271871]  ? tun_chr_read_iter+0x2ca/0x2d0
[  466.271890]  print_address_description+0x79/0x440
[  466.271906]  ? vprintk_func+0x5e/0xf0
[  466.271920]  ? tun_chr_read_iter+0x2ca/0x2d0
[  466.271935]  __kasan_report+0x15c/0x1df
[  466.271958]  ? tun_chr_read_iter+0x2ca/0x2d0
[  466.271976]  kasan_report+0xe/0x20
[  466.271987]  tun_chr_read_iter+0x2ca/0x2d0
[  466.272013]  do_iter_readv_writev+0x4b7/0x740
[  466.272032]  ? default_llseek+0x2d0/0x2d0
[  466.272072]  do_iter_read+0x1c5/0x5e0
[  466.272110]  vfs_readv+0x108/0x180
[  466.299007]  ? compat_rw_copy_check_uvector+0x440/0x440
[  466.299020]  ? fsnotify+0x888/0xd50
[  466.299040]  ? __fsnotify_parent+0xd0/0x350
[  466.299064]  ? fsnotify_first_mark+0x1e0/0x1e0
[  466.304548]  ? vfs_write+0x264/0x510
[  466.304569]  ? ksys_write+0x101/0x210
[  466.304591]  ? do_preadv+0x116/0x1a0
[  466.304609]  do_preadv+0x116/0x1a0
[  466.309829]  do_syscall_64+0xc8/0x600
[  466.309849]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[  466.309861] RIP: 0033:0x4560f9
[  466.309875] Code: 00 00 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[  466.309889] RSP: 002b:00007ffffa5166e8 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000127
[  466.322992] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000400460 RCX: 00000000004560f9
[  466.322999] RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: 00000000200008c0 RDI: 0000000000000003
[  466.323007] RBP: 00007ffffa516700 R08: 0000000000000004 R09: 0000000000000000
[  466.323014] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 000000000040cb10
[  466.323021] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00000000006d7018 R15: 0000000000000000
[  466.323057]
[  466.323064] Allocated by task 2605:
[  466.335165]  save_stack+0x19/0x80
[  466.336240]  __kasan_kmalloc.constprop.8+0xa0/0xd0
[  466.337755]  kmem_cache_alloc+0xe8/0x320
[  466.339050]  getname_flags+0xca/0x560
[  466.340229]  user_path_at_empty+0x2c/0x50
[  466.341508]  vfs_statx+0xe6/0x190
[  466.342619]  __do_sys_newstat+0x81/0x100
[  466.343908]  do_syscall_64+0xc8/0x600
[  466.345303]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[  466.347034]
[  466.347517] Freed by task 2605:
[  466.348471]  save_stack+0x19/0x80
[  466.349476]  __kasan_slab_free+0x12e/0x180
[  466.350726]  kmem_cache_free+0xc8/0x430
[  466.351874]  putname+0xe2/0x120
[  466.352921]  filename_lookup+0x257/0x3e0
[  466.354319]  vfs_statx+0xe6/0x190
[  466.355498]  __do_sys_newstat+0x81/0x100
[  466.356889]  do_syscall_64+0xc8/0x600
[  466.358037]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[  466.359567]
[  466.360050] The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff888372139100
[  466.360050]  which belongs to the cache names_cache of size 4096
[  466.363735] The buggy address is located 336 bytes inside of
[  466.363735]  4096-byte region [ffff888372139100, ffff88837213a100)
[  466.367179] The buggy address belongs to the page:
[  466.368604] page:ffffea000dc84e00 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:ffff8883df1b4f00 index:0x0 compound_mapcount: 0
[  466.371582] flags: 0x2fffff80010200(slab|head)
[  466.372910] raw: 002fffff80010200 dead000000000100 dead000000000122 ffff8883df1b4f00
[  466.375209] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000070007 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000
[  466.377778] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
[  466.379730]
[  466.380288] Memory state around the buggy address:
[  466.381844]  ffff888372139100: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
[  466.384009]  ffff888372139180: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
[  466.386131] >ffff888372139200: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
[  466.388257]                                                  ^
[  466.390234]  ffff888372139280: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
[  466.392512]  ffff888372139300: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
[  466.394667] ==================================================================

tun_chr_read_iter() accessed the memory which freed by free_netdev()
called by tun_set_iff():

        CPUA                                           CPUB
  tun_set_iff()
    alloc_netdev_mqs()
    tun_attach()
                                                  tun_chr_read_iter()
                                                    tun_get()
                                                    tun_do_read()
                                                      tun_ring_recv()
    register_netdevice() <-- inject error
    goto err_detach
    tun_detach_all() <-- set RCV_SHUTDOWN
    free_netdev() <-- called from
                     err_free_dev path
      netdev_freemem() <-- free the memory
                        without check refcount
      (In this path, the refcount cannot prevent
       freeing the memory of dev, and the memory
       will be used by dev_put() called by
       tun_chr_read_iter() on CPUB.)
                                                     (Break from tun_ring_recv(),
                                                     because RCV_SHUTDOWN is set)
                                                   tun_put()
                                                     dev_put() <-- use the memory
                                                                   freed by netdev_freemem()

Put the publishing of tfile->tun after register_netdevice(),
so tun_get() won't get the tun pointer that freed by
err_detach path if register_netdevice() failed.

Fixes: eb0fb36 ("tuntap: attach queue 0 before registering netdevice")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Jason Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <[email protected]>
fengguang pushed a commit to 0day-ci/linux that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2019
I got a UAF repport in tun driver when doing fuzzy test:

[  466.269490] ==================================================================
[  466.271792] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in tun_chr_read_iter+0x2ca/0x2d0
[  466.271806] Read of size 8 at addr ffff888372139250 by task tun-test/2699
[  466.271810]
[  466.271824] CPU: 1 PID: 2699 Comm: tun-test Not tainted 5.3.0-rc1-00001-g5a9433db2614-dirty torvalds#427
[  466.271833] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.1-0-ga5cab58e9a3f-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[  466.271838] Call Trace:
[  466.271858]  dump_stack+0xca/0x13e
[  466.271871]  ? tun_chr_read_iter+0x2ca/0x2d0
[  466.271890]  print_address_description+0x79/0x440
[  466.271906]  ? vprintk_func+0x5e/0xf0
[  466.271920]  ? tun_chr_read_iter+0x2ca/0x2d0
[  466.271935]  __kasan_report+0x15c/0x1df
[  466.271958]  ? tun_chr_read_iter+0x2ca/0x2d0
[  466.271976]  kasan_report+0xe/0x20
[  466.271987]  tun_chr_read_iter+0x2ca/0x2d0
[  466.272013]  do_iter_readv_writev+0x4b7/0x740
[  466.272032]  ? default_llseek+0x2d0/0x2d0
[  466.272072]  do_iter_read+0x1c5/0x5e0
[  466.272110]  vfs_readv+0x108/0x180
[  466.299007]  ? compat_rw_copy_check_uvector+0x440/0x440
[  466.299020]  ? fsnotify+0x888/0xd50
[  466.299040]  ? __fsnotify_parent+0xd0/0x350
[  466.299064]  ? fsnotify_first_mark+0x1e0/0x1e0
[  466.304548]  ? vfs_write+0x264/0x510
[  466.304569]  ? ksys_write+0x101/0x210
[  466.304591]  ? do_preadv+0x116/0x1a0
[  466.304609]  do_preadv+0x116/0x1a0
[  466.309829]  do_syscall_64+0xc8/0x600
[  466.309849]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[  466.309861] RIP: 0033:0x4560f9
[  466.309875] Code: 00 00 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[  466.309889] RSP: 002b:00007ffffa5166e8 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000127
[  466.322992] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000400460 RCX: 00000000004560f9
[  466.322999] RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: 00000000200008c0 RDI: 0000000000000003
[  466.323007] RBP: 00007ffffa516700 R08: 0000000000000004 R09: 0000000000000000
[  466.323014] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 000000000040cb10
[  466.323021] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00000000006d7018 R15: 0000000000000000
[  466.323057]
[  466.323064] Allocated by task 2605:
[  466.335165]  save_stack+0x19/0x80
[  466.336240]  __kasan_kmalloc.constprop.8+0xa0/0xd0
[  466.337755]  kmem_cache_alloc+0xe8/0x320
[  466.339050]  getname_flags+0xca/0x560
[  466.340229]  user_path_at_empty+0x2c/0x50
[  466.341508]  vfs_statx+0xe6/0x190
[  466.342619]  __do_sys_newstat+0x81/0x100
[  466.343908]  do_syscall_64+0xc8/0x600
[  466.345303]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[  466.347034]
[  466.347517] Freed by task 2605:
[  466.348471]  save_stack+0x19/0x80
[  466.349476]  __kasan_slab_free+0x12e/0x180
[  466.350726]  kmem_cache_free+0xc8/0x430
[  466.351874]  putname+0xe2/0x120
[  466.352921]  filename_lookup+0x257/0x3e0
[  466.354319]  vfs_statx+0xe6/0x190
[  466.355498]  __do_sys_newstat+0x81/0x100
[  466.356889]  do_syscall_64+0xc8/0x600
[  466.358037]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[  466.359567]
[  466.360050] The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff888372139100
[  466.360050]  which belongs to the cache names_cache of size 4096
[  466.363735] The buggy address is located 336 bytes inside of
[  466.363735]  4096-byte region [ffff888372139100, ffff88837213a100)
[  466.367179] The buggy address belongs to the page:
[  466.368604] page:ffffea000dc84e00 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:ffff8883df1b4f00 index:0x0 compound_mapcount: 0
[  466.371582] flags: 0x2fffff80010200(slab|head)
[  466.372910] raw: 002fffff80010200 dead000000000100 dead000000000122 ffff8883df1b4f00
[  466.375209] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000070007 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000
[  466.377778] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
[  466.379730]
[  466.380288] Memory state around the buggy address:
[  466.381844]  ffff888372139100: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
[  466.384009]  ffff888372139180: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
[  466.386131] >ffff888372139200: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
[  466.388257]                                                  ^
[  466.390234]  ffff888372139280: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
[  466.392512]  ffff888372139300: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
[  466.394667] ==================================================================

tun_chr_read_iter() accessed the memory which freed by free_netdev()
called by tun_set_iff():

        CPUA                                           CPUB
  tun_set_iff()
    alloc_netdev_mqs()
    tun_attach()
                                                  tun_chr_read_iter()
                                                    tun_get()
                                                    tun_do_read()
                                                      tun_ring_recv()
    register_netdevice() <-- inject error
    goto err_detach
    tun_detach_all() <-- set RCV_SHUTDOWN
    free_netdev() <-- called from
                     err_free_dev path
      netdev_freemem() <-- free the memory
                        without check refcount
      (In this path, the refcount cannot prevent
       freeing the memory of dev, and the memory
       will be used by dev_put() called by
       tun_chr_read_iter() on CPUB.)
                                                     (Break from tun_ring_recv(),
                                                     because RCV_SHUTDOWN is set)
                                                   tun_put()
                                                     dev_put() <-- use the memory
                                                                   freed by netdev_freemem()

Put the publishing of tfile->tun after register_netdevice(),
so tun_get() won't get the tun pointer that freed by
err_detach path if register_netdevice() failed.

Fixes: eb0fb36 ("tuntap: attach queue 0 before registering netdevice")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Jason Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Noltari pushed a commit to Noltari/linux that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2019
[ Upstream commit 77f22f9 ]

I got a UAF repport in tun driver when doing fuzzy test:

[  466.269490] ==================================================================
[  466.271792] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in tun_chr_read_iter+0x2ca/0x2d0
[  466.271806] Read of size 8 at addr ffff888372139250 by task tun-test/2699
[  466.271810]
[  466.271824] CPU: 1 PID: 2699 Comm: tun-test Not tainted 5.3.0-rc1-00001-g5a9433db2614-dirty torvalds#427
[  466.271833] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.1-0-ga5cab58e9a3f-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[  466.271838] Call Trace:
[  466.271858]  dump_stack+0xca/0x13e
[  466.271871]  ? tun_chr_read_iter+0x2ca/0x2d0
[  466.271890]  print_address_description+0x79/0x440
[  466.271906]  ? vprintk_func+0x5e/0xf0
[  466.271920]  ? tun_chr_read_iter+0x2ca/0x2d0
[  466.271935]  __kasan_report+0x15c/0x1df
[  466.271958]  ? tun_chr_read_iter+0x2ca/0x2d0
[  466.271976]  kasan_report+0xe/0x20
[  466.271987]  tun_chr_read_iter+0x2ca/0x2d0
[  466.272013]  do_iter_readv_writev+0x4b7/0x740
[  466.272032]  ? default_llseek+0x2d0/0x2d0
[  466.272072]  do_iter_read+0x1c5/0x5e0
[  466.272110]  vfs_readv+0x108/0x180
[  466.299007]  ? compat_rw_copy_check_uvector+0x440/0x440
[  466.299020]  ? fsnotify+0x888/0xd50
[  466.299040]  ? __fsnotify_parent+0xd0/0x350
[  466.299064]  ? fsnotify_first_mark+0x1e0/0x1e0
[  466.304548]  ? vfs_write+0x264/0x510
[  466.304569]  ? ksys_write+0x101/0x210
[  466.304591]  ? do_preadv+0x116/0x1a0
[  466.304609]  do_preadv+0x116/0x1a0
[  466.309829]  do_syscall_64+0xc8/0x600
[  466.309849]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[  466.309861] RIP: 0033:0x4560f9
[  466.309875] Code: 00 00 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[  466.309889] RSP: 002b:00007ffffa5166e8 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000127
[  466.322992] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000400460 RCX: 00000000004560f9
[  466.322999] RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: 00000000200008c0 RDI: 0000000000000003
[  466.323007] RBP: 00007ffffa516700 R08: 0000000000000004 R09: 0000000000000000
[  466.323014] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 000000000040cb10
[  466.323021] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00000000006d7018 R15: 0000000000000000
[  466.323057]
[  466.323064] Allocated by task 2605:
[  466.335165]  save_stack+0x19/0x80
[  466.336240]  __kasan_kmalloc.constprop.8+0xa0/0xd0
[  466.337755]  kmem_cache_alloc+0xe8/0x320
[  466.339050]  getname_flags+0xca/0x560
[  466.340229]  user_path_at_empty+0x2c/0x50
[  466.341508]  vfs_statx+0xe6/0x190
[  466.342619]  __do_sys_newstat+0x81/0x100
[  466.343908]  do_syscall_64+0xc8/0x600
[  466.345303]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[  466.347034]
[  466.347517] Freed by task 2605:
[  466.348471]  save_stack+0x19/0x80
[  466.349476]  __kasan_slab_free+0x12e/0x180
[  466.350726]  kmem_cache_free+0xc8/0x430
[  466.351874]  putname+0xe2/0x120
[  466.352921]  filename_lookup+0x257/0x3e0
[  466.354319]  vfs_statx+0xe6/0x190
[  466.355498]  __do_sys_newstat+0x81/0x100
[  466.356889]  do_syscall_64+0xc8/0x600
[  466.358037]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[  466.359567]
[  466.360050] The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff888372139100
[  466.360050]  which belongs to the cache names_cache of size 4096
[  466.363735] The buggy address is located 336 bytes inside of
[  466.363735]  4096-byte region [ffff888372139100, ffff88837213a100)
[  466.367179] The buggy address belongs to the page:
[  466.368604] page:ffffea000dc84e00 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:ffff8883df1b4f00 index:0x0 compound_mapcount: 0
[  466.371582] flags: 0x2fffff80010200(slab|head)
[  466.372910] raw: 002fffff80010200 dead000000000100 dead000000000122 ffff8883df1b4f00
[  466.375209] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000070007 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000
[  466.377778] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
[  466.379730]
[  466.380288] Memory state around the buggy address:
[  466.381844]  ffff888372139100: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
[  466.384009]  ffff888372139180: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
[  466.386131] >ffff888372139200: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
[  466.388257]                                                  ^
[  466.390234]  ffff888372139280: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
[  466.392512]  ffff888372139300: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
[  466.394667] ==================================================================

tun_chr_read_iter() accessed the memory which freed by free_netdev()
called by tun_set_iff():

        CPUA                                           CPUB
  tun_set_iff()
    alloc_netdev_mqs()
    tun_attach()
                                                  tun_chr_read_iter()
                                                    tun_get()
                                                    tun_do_read()
                                                      tun_ring_recv()
    register_netdevice() <-- inject error
    goto err_detach
    tun_detach_all() <-- set RCV_SHUTDOWN
    free_netdev() <-- called from
                     err_free_dev path
      netdev_freemem() <-- free the memory
                        without check refcount
      (In this path, the refcount cannot prevent
       freeing the memory of dev, and the memory
       will be used by dev_put() called by
       tun_chr_read_iter() on CPUB.)
                                                     (Break from tun_ring_recv(),
                                                     because RCV_SHUTDOWN is set)
                                                   tun_put()
                                                     dev_put() <-- use the memory
                                                                   freed by netdev_freemem()

Put the publishing of tfile->tun after register_netdevice(),
so tun_get() won't get the tun pointer that freed by
err_detach path if register_netdevice() failed.

Fixes: eb0fb36 ("tuntap: attach queue 0 before registering netdevice")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Jason Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Noltari pushed a commit to Noltari/linux that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2019
[ Upstream commit 77f22f9 ]

I got a UAF repport in tun driver when doing fuzzy test:

[  466.269490] ==================================================================
[  466.271792] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in tun_chr_read_iter+0x2ca/0x2d0
[  466.271806] Read of size 8 at addr ffff888372139250 by task tun-test/2699
[  466.271810]
[  466.271824] CPU: 1 PID: 2699 Comm: tun-test Not tainted 5.3.0-rc1-00001-g5a9433db2614-dirty torvalds#427
[  466.271833] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.1-0-ga5cab58e9a3f-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[  466.271838] Call Trace:
[  466.271858]  dump_stack+0xca/0x13e
[  466.271871]  ? tun_chr_read_iter+0x2ca/0x2d0
[  466.271890]  print_address_description+0x79/0x440
[  466.271906]  ? vprintk_func+0x5e/0xf0
[  466.271920]  ? tun_chr_read_iter+0x2ca/0x2d0
[  466.271935]  __kasan_report+0x15c/0x1df
[  466.271958]  ? tun_chr_read_iter+0x2ca/0x2d0
[  466.271976]  kasan_report+0xe/0x20
[  466.271987]  tun_chr_read_iter+0x2ca/0x2d0
[  466.272013]  do_iter_readv_writev+0x4b7/0x740
[  466.272032]  ? default_llseek+0x2d0/0x2d0
[  466.272072]  do_iter_read+0x1c5/0x5e0
[  466.272110]  vfs_readv+0x108/0x180
[  466.299007]  ? compat_rw_copy_check_uvector+0x440/0x440
[  466.299020]  ? fsnotify+0x888/0xd50
[  466.299040]  ? __fsnotify_parent+0xd0/0x350
[  466.299064]  ? fsnotify_first_mark+0x1e0/0x1e0
[  466.304548]  ? vfs_write+0x264/0x510
[  466.304569]  ? ksys_write+0x101/0x210
[  466.304591]  ? do_preadv+0x116/0x1a0
[  466.304609]  do_preadv+0x116/0x1a0
[  466.309829]  do_syscall_64+0xc8/0x600
[  466.309849]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[  466.309861] RIP: 0033:0x4560f9
[  466.309875] Code: 00 00 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[  466.309889] RSP: 002b:00007ffffa5166e8 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000127
[  466.322992] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000400460 RCX: 00000000004560f9
[  466.322999] RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: 00000000200008c0 RDI: 0000000000000003
[  466.323007] RBP: 00007ffffa516700 R08: 0000000000000004 R09: 0000000000000000
[  466.323014] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 000000000040cb10
[  466.323021] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00000000006d7018 R15: 0000000000000000
[  466.323057]
[  466.323064] Allocated by task 2605:
[  466.335165]  save_stack+0x19/0x80
[  466.336240]  __kasan_kmalloc.constprop.8+0xa0/0xd0
[  466.337755]  kmem_cache_alloc+0xe8/0x320
[  466.339050]  getname_flags+0xca/0x560
[  466.340229]  user_path_at_empty+0x2c/0x50
[  466.341508]  vfs_statx+0xe6/0x190
[  466.342619]  __do_sys_newstat+0x81/0x100
[  466.343908]  do_syscall_64+0xc8/0x600
[  466.345303]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[  466.347034]
[  466.347517] Freed by task 2605:
[  466.348471]  save_stack+0x19/0x80
[  466.349476]  __kasan_slab_free+0x12e/0x180
[  466.350726]  kmem_cache_free+0xc8/0x430
[  466.351874]  putname+0xe2/0x120
[  466.352921]  filename_lookup+0x257/0x3e0
[  466.354319]  vfs_statx+0xe6/0x190
[  466.355498]  __do_sys_newstat+0x81/0x100
[  466.356889]  do_syscall_64+0xc8/0x600
[  466.358037]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[  466.359567]
[  466.360050] The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff888372139100
[  466.360050]  which belongs to the cache names_cache of size 4096
[  466.363735] The buggy address is located 336 bytes inside of
[  466.363735]  4096-byte region [ffff888372139100, ffff88837213a100)
[  466.367179] The buggy address belongs to the page:
[  466.368604] page:ffffea000dc84e00 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:ffff8883df1b4f00 index:0x0 compound_mapcount: 0
[  466.371582] flags: 0x2fffff80010200(slab|head)
[  466.372910] raw: 002fffff80010200 dead000000000100 dead000000000122 ffff8883df1b4f00
[  466.375209] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000070007 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000
[  466.377778] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
[  466.379730]
[  466.380288] Memory state around the buggy address:
[  466.381844]  ffff888372139100: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
[  466.384009]  ffff888372139180: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
[  466.386131] >ffff888372139200: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
[  466.388257]                                                  ^
[  466.390234]  ffff888372139280: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
[  466.392512]  ffff888372139300: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
[  466.394667] ==================================================================

tun_chr_read_iter() accessed the memory which freed by free_netdev()
called by tun_set_iff():

        CPUA                                           CPUB
  tun_set_iff()
    alloc_netdev_mqs()
    tun_attach()
                                                  tun_chr_read_iter()
                                                    tun_get()
                                                    tun_do_read()
                                                      tun_ring_recv()
    register_netdevice() <-- inject error
    goto err_detach
    tun_detach_all() <-- set RCV_SHUTDOWN
    free_netdev() <-- called from
                     err_free_dev path
      netdev_freemem() <-- free the memory
                        without check refcount
      (In this path, the refcount cannot prevent
       freeing the memory of dev, and the memory
       will be used by dev_put() called by
       tun_chr_read_iter() on CPUB.)
                                                     (Break from tun_ring_recv(),
                                                     because RCV_SHUTDOWN is set)
                                                   tun_put()
                                                     dev_put() <-- use the memory
                                                                   freed by netdev_freemem()

Put the publishing of tfile->tun after register_netdevice(),
so tun_get() won't get the tun pointer that freed by
err_detach path if register_netdevice() failed.

Fixes: eb0fb36 ("tuntap: attach queue 0 before registering netdevice")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Jason Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
kuba-moo pushed a commit to linux-netdev/testing that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2025
When transmitting a PTP frame which is timestamp using 2 step, the
following warning appears if CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 Not tainted
-----------------------------
ptp4l/119 is trying to lock:
c2a44ed4 (&vsc8531->ts_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{4:4}
4 locks held by ptp4l/119:
 #0: c145f068 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x58/0x1440
 #1: c29df974 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x5c4/0x1440
 #2: c2aaaad0 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sch_direct_xmit+0x108/0x350
 #3: c2aac170 (&lan966x->tx_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: lan966x_port_xmit+0xd0/0x350
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 119 Comm: ptp4l Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 NONE
Hardware name: Generic DT based system
Call trace:
 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x7c/0xac
 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x8e8/0x29dc
 __lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0x108/0x38c
 lock_acquire from __mutex_lock+0xb0/0xe78
 __mutex_lock from mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
 mutex_lock_nested from vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
 vsc85xx_txtstamp from lan966x_fdma_xmit+0xd8/0x3a8
 lan966x_fdma_xmit from lan966x_port_xmit+0x1bc/0x350
 lan966x_port_xmit from dev_hard_start_xmit+0xc8/0x2c0
 dev_hard_start_xmit from sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x350
 sch_direct_xmit from __dev_queue_xmit+0x680/0x1440
 __dev_queue_xmit from packet_sendmsg+0xfa4/0x1568
 packet_sendmsg from __sys_sendto+0x110/0x19c
 __sys_sendto from sys_send+0x18/0x20
 sys_send from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
Exception stack(0xf0b05fa8 to 0xf0b05ff0)
5fa0:                   00000001 0000000 0000000 0004b47a 0000003a 00000000
5fc0: 00000001 0000000 00000000 00000121 0004af58 00044874 00000000 00000000
5fe0: 00000001 bee9d420 00025a10 b6e75c7c

So, instead of using the ts_lock for tx_queue, use the spinlock that
skb_buff_head has.

Fixes: 7d272e6 ("net: phy: mscc: timestamping and PHC support")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo pushed a commit to linux-netdev/testing that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2025
When transmitting a PTP frame which is timestamp using 2 step, the
following warning appears if CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 Not tainted
-----------------------------
ptp4l/119 is trying to lock:
c2a44ed4 (&vsc8531->ts_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{4:4}
4 locks held by ptp4l/119:
 #0: c145f068 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x58/0x1440
 #1: c29df974 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x5c4/0x1440
 #2: c2aaaad0 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sch_direct_xmit+0x108/0x350
 #3: c2aac170 (&lan966x->tx_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: lan966x_port_xmit+0xd0/0x350
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 119 Comm: ptp4l Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 NONE
Hardware name: Generic DT based system
Call trace:
 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x7c/0xac
 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x8e8/0x29dc
 __lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0x108/0x38c
 lock_acquire from __mutex_lock+0xb0/0xe78
 __mutex_lock from mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
 mutex_lock_nested from vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
 vsc85xx_txtstamp from lan966x_fdma_xmit+0xd8/0x3a8
 lan966x_fdma_xmit from lan966x_port_xmit+0x1bc/0x350
 lan966x_port_xmit from dev_hard_start_xmit+0xc8/0x2c0
 dev_hard_start_xmit from sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x350
 sch_direct_xmit from __dev_queue_xmit+0x680/0x1440
 __dev_queue_xmit from packet_sendmsg+0xfa4/0x1568
 packet_sendmsg from __sys_sendto+0x110/0x19c
 __sys_sendto from sys_send+0x18/0x20
 sys_send from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
Exception stack(0xf0b05fa8 to 0xf0b05ff0)
5fa0:                   00000001 0000000 0000000 0004b47a 0000003a 00000000
5fc0: 00000001 0000000 00000000 00000121 0004af58 00044874 00000000 00000000
5fe0: 00000001 bee9d420 00025a10 b6e75c7c

So, instead of using the ts_lock for tx_queue, use the spinlock that
skb_buff_head has.

Fixes: 7d272e6 ("net: phy: mscc: timestamping and PHC support")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo pushed a commit to linux-netdev/testing that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2025
When transmitting a PTP frame which is timestamp using 2 step, the
following warning appears if CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 Not tainted
-----------------------------
ptp4l/119 is trying to lock:
c2a44ed4 (&vsc8531->ts_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{4:4}
4 locks held by ptp4l/119:
 #0: c145f068 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x58/0x1440
 #1: c29df974 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x5c4/0x1440
 #2: c2aaaad0 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sch_direct_xmit+0x108/0x350
 #3: c2aac170 (&lan966x->tx_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: lan966x_port_xmit+0xd0/0x350
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 119 Comm: ptp4l Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 NONE
Hardware name: Generic DT based system
Call trace:
 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x7c/0xac
 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x8e8/0x29dc
 __lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0x108/0x38c
 lock_acquire from __mutex_lock+0xb0/0xe78
 __mutex_lock from mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
 mutex_lock_nested from vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
 vsc85xx_txtstamp from lan966x_fdma_xmit+0xd8/0x3a8
 lan966x_fdma_xmit from lan966x_port_xmit+0x1bc/0x350
 lan966x_port_xmit from dev_hard_start_xmit+0xc8/0x2c0
 dev_hard_start_xmit from sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x350
 sch_direct_xmit from __dev_queue_xmit+0x680/0x1440
 __dev_queue_xmit from packet_sendmsg+0xfa4/0x1568
 packet_sendmsg from __sys_sendto+0x110/0x19c
 __sys_sendto from sys_send+0x18/0x20
 sys_send from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
Exception stack(0xf0b05fa8 to 0xf0b05ff0)
5fa0:                   00000001 0000000 0000000 0004b47a 0000003a 00000000
5fc0: 00000001 0000000 00000000 00000121 0004af58 00044874 00000000 00000000
5fe0: 00000001 bee9d420 00025a10 b6e75c7c

So, instead of using the ts_lock for tx_queue, use the spinlock that
skb_buff_head has.

Fixes: 7d272e6 ("net: phy: mscc: timestamping and PHC support")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo pushed a commit to linux-netdev/testing that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2025
When transmitting a PTP frame which is timestamp using 2 step, the
following warning appears if CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 Not tainted
-----------------------------
ptp4l/119 is trying to lock:
c2a44ed4 (&vsc8531->ts_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{4:4}
4 locks held by ptp4l/119:
 #0: c145f068 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x58/0x1440
 #1: c29df974 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x5c4/0x1440
 #2: c2aaaad0 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sch_direct_xmit+0x108/0x350
 #3: c2aac170 (&lan966x->tx_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: lan966x_port_xmit+0xd0/0x350
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 119 Comm: ptp4l Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 NONE
Hardware name: Generic DT based system
Call trace:
 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x7c/0xac
 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x8e8/0x29dc
 __lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0x108/0x38c
 lock_acquire from __mutex_lock+0xb0/0xe78
 __mutex_lock from mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
 mutex_lock_nested from vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
 vsc85xx_txtstamp from lan966x_fdma_xmit+0xd8/0x3a8
 lan966x_fdma_xmit from lan966x_port_xmit+0x1bc/0x350
 lan966x_port_xmit from dev_hard_start_xmit+0xc8/0x2c0
 dev_hard_start_xmit from sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x350
 sch_direct_xmit from __dev_queue_xmit+0x680/0x1440
 __dev_queue_xmit from packet_sendmsg+0xfa4/0x1568
 packet_sendmsg from __sys_sendto+0x110/0x19c
 __sys_sendto from sys_send+0x18/0x20
 sys_send from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
Exception stack(0xf0b05fa8 to 0xf0b05ff0)
5fa0:                   00000001 0000000 0000000 0004b47a 0000003a 00000000
5fc0: 00000001 0000000 00000000 00000121 0004af58 00044874 00000000 00000000
5fe0: 00000001 bee9d420 00025a10 b6e75c7c

So, instead of using the ts_lock for tx_queue, use the spinlock that
skb_buff_head has.

Fixes: 7d272e6 ("net: phy: mscc: timestamping and PHC support")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo pushed a commit to linux-netdev/testing that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2025
When transmitting a PTP frame which is timestamp using 2 step, the
following warning appears if CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 Not tainted
-----------------------------
ptp4l/119 is trying to lock:
c2a44ed4 (&vsc8531->ts_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{4:4}
4 locks held by ptp4l/119:
 #0: c145f068 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x58/0x1440
 #1: c29df974 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x5c4/0x1440
 #2: c2aaaad0 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sch_direct_xmit+0x108/0x350
 #3: c2aac170 (&lan966x->tx_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: lan966x_port_xmit+0xd0/0x350
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 119 Comm: ptp4l Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 NONE
Hardware name: Generic DT based system
Call trace:
 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x7c/0xac
 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x8e8/0x29dc
 __lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0x108/0x38c
 lock_acquire from __mutex_lock+0xb0/0xe78
 __mutex_lock from mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
 mutex_lock_nested from vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
 vsc85xx_txtstamp from lan966x_fdma_xmit+0xd8/0x3a8
 lan966x_fdma_xmit from lan966x_port_xmit+0x1bc/0x350
 lan966x_port_xmit from dev_hard_start_xmit+0xc8/0x2c0
 dev_hard_start_xmit from sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x350
 sch_direct_xmit from __dev_queue_xmit+0x680/0x1440
 __dev_queue_xmit from packet_sendmsg+0xfa4/0x1568
 packet_sendmsg from __sys_sendto+0x110/0x19c
 __sys_sendto from sys_send+0x18/0x20
 sys_send from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
Exception stack(0xf0b05fa8 to 0xf0b05ff0)
5fa0:                   00000001 0000000 0000000 0004b47a 0000003a 00000000
5fc0: 00000001 0000000 00000000 00000121 0004af58 00044874 00000000 00000000
5fe0: 00000001 bee9d420 00025a10 b6e75c7c

So, instead of using the ts_lock for tx_queue, use the spinlock that
skb_buff_head has.

Fixes: 7d272e6 ("net: phy: mscc: timestamping and PHC support")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
intel-lab-lkp pushed a commit to intel-lab-lkp/linux that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2025
When transmitting a PTP frame which is timestamp using 2 step, the
following warning appears if CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 Not tainted
-----------------------------
ptp4l/119 is trying to lock:
c2a44ed4 (&vsc8531->ts_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{4:4}
4 locks held by ptp4l/119:
 #0: c145f068 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x58/0x1440
 #1: c29df974 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x5c4/0x1440
 #2: c2aaaad0 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sch_direct_xmit+0x108/0x350
 #3: c2aac170 (&lan966x->tx_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: lan966x_port_xmit+0xd0/0x350
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 119 Comm: ptp4l Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 NONE
Hardware name: Generic DT based system
Call trace:
 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x7c/0xac
 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x8e8/0x29dc
 __lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0x108/0x38c
 lock_acquire from __mutex_lock+0xb0/0xe78
 __mutex_lock from mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
 mutex_lock_nested from vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
 vsc85xx_txtstamp from lan966x_fdma_xmit+0xd8/0x3a8
 lan966x_fdma_xmit from lan966x_port_xmit+0x1bc/0x350
 lan966x_port_xmit from dev_hard_start_xmit+0xc8/0x2c0
 dev_hard_start_xmit from sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x350
 sch_direct_xmit from __dev_queue_xmit+0x680/0x1440
 __dev_queue_xmit from packet_sendmsg+0xfa4/0x1568
 packet_sendmsg from __sys_sendto+0x110/0x19c
 __sys_sendto from sys_send+0x18/0x20
 sys_send from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
Exception stack(0xf0b05fa8 to 0xf0b05ff0)
5fa0:                   00000001 0000000 0000000 0004b47a 0000003a 00000000
5fc0: 00000001 0000000 00000000 00000121 0004af58 00044874 00000000 00000000
5fe0: 00000001 bee9d420 00025a10 b6e75c7c

So, instead of using the ts_lock for tx_queue, use the spinlock that
skb_buff_head has.

Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <[email protected]>
Fixes: 7d272e6 ("net: phy: mscc: timestamping and PHC support")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <[email protected]>
kuba-moo pushed a commit to linux-netdev/testing that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2025
When transmitting a PTP frame which is timestamp using 2 step, the
following warning appears if CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 Not tainted
-----------------------------
ptp4l/119 is trying to lock:
c2a44ed4 (&vsc8531->ts_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{4:4}
4 locks held by ptp4l/119:
 #0: c145f068 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x58/0x1440
 #1: c29df974 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x5c4/0x1440
 #2: c2aaaad0 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sch_direct_xmit+0x108/0x350
 #3: c2aac170 (&lan966x->tx_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: lan966x_port_xmit+0xd0/0x350
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 119 Comm: ptp4l Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 NONE
Hardware name: Generic DT based system
Call trace:
 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x7c/0xac
 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x8e8/0x29dc
 __lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0x108/0x38c
 lock_acquire from __mutex_lock+0xb0/0xe78
 __mutex_lock from mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
 mutex_lock_nested from vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
 vsc85xx_txtstamp from lan966x_fdma_xmit+0xd8/0x3a8
 lan966x_fdma_xmit from lan966x_port_xmit+0x1bc/0x350
 lan966x_port_xmit from dev_hard_start_xmit+0xc8/0x2c0
 dev_hard_start_xmit from sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x350
 sch_direct_xmit from __dev_queue_xmit+0x680/0x1440
 __dev_queue_xmit from packet_sendmsg+0xfa4/0x1568
 packet_sendmsg from __sys_sendto+0x110/0x19c
 __sys_sendto from sys_send+0x18/0x20
 sys_send from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
Exception stack(0xf0b05fa8 to 0xf0b05ff0)
5fa0:                   00000001 0000000 0000000 0004b47a 0000003a 00000000
5fc0: 00000001 0000000 00000000 00000121 0004af58 00044874 00000000 00000000
5fe0: 00000001 bee9d420 00025a10 b6e75c7c

So, instead of using the ts_lock for tx_queue, use the spinlock that
skb_buff_head has.

Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <[email protected]>
Fixes: 7d272e6 ("net: phy: mscc: timestamping and PHC support")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo pushed a commit to linux-netdev/testing that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2025
When transmitting a PTP frame which is timestamp using 2 step, the
following warning appears if CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 Not tainted
-----------------------------
ptp4l/119 is trying to lock:
c2a44ed4 (&vsc8531->ts_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{4:4}
4 locks held by ptp4l/119:
 #0: c145f068 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x58/0x1440
 #1: c29df974 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x5c4/0x1440
 #2: c2aaaad0 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sch_direct_xmit+0x108/0x350
 #3: c2aac170 (&lan966x->tx_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: lan966x_port_xmit+0xd0/0x350
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 119 Comm: ptp4l Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 NONE
Hardware name: Generic DT based system
Call trace:
 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x7c/0xac
 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x8e8/0x29dc
 __lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0x108/0x38c
 lock_acquire from __mutex_lock+0xb0/0xe78
 __mutex_lock from mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
 mutex_lock_nested from vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
 vsc85xx_txtstamp from lan966x_fdma_xmit+0xd8/0x3a8
 lan966x_fdma_xmit from lan966x_port_xmit+0x1bc/0x350
 lan966x_port_xmit from dev_hard_start_xmit+0xc8/0x2c0
 dev_hard_start_xmit from sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x350
 sch_direct_xmit from __dev_queue_xmit+0x680/0x1440
 __dev_queue_xmit from packet_sendmsg+0xfa4/0x1568
 packet_sendmsg from __sys_sendto+0x110/0x19c
 __sys_sendto from sys_send+0x18/0x20
 sys_send from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
Exception stack(0xf0b05fa8 to 0xf0b05ff0)
5fa0:                   00000001 0000000 0000000 0004b47a 0000003a 00000000
5fc0: 00000001 0000000 00000000 00000121 0004af58 00044874 00000000 00000000
5fe0: 00000001 bee9d420 00025a10 b6e75c7c

So, instead of using the ts_lock for tx_queue, use the spinlock that
skb_buff_head has.

Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <[email protected]>
Fixes: 7d272e6 ("net: phy: mscc: timestamping and PHC support")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo pushed a commit to linux-netdev/testing that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2025
When transmitting a PTP frame which is timestamp using 2 step, the
following warning appears if CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 Not tainted
-----------------------------
ptp4l/119 is trying to lock:
c2a44ed4 (&vsc8531->ts_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{4:4}
4 locks held by ptp4l/119:
 #0: c145f068 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x58/0x1440
 #1: c29df974 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x5c4/0x1440
 #2: c2aaaad0 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sch_direct_xmit+0x108/0x350
 #3: c2aac170 (&lan966x->tx_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: lan966x_port_xmit+0xd0/0x350
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 119 Comm: ptp4l Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 NONE
Hardware name: Generic DT based system
Call trace:
 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x7c/0xac
 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x8e8/0x29dc
 __lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0x108/0x38c
 lock_acquire from __mutex_lock+0xb0/0xe78
 __mutex_lock from mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
 mutex_lock_nested from vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
 vsc85xx_txtstamp from lan966x_fdma_xmit+0xd8/0x3a8
 lan966x_fdma_xmit from lan966x_port_xmit+0x1bc/0x350
 lan966x_port_xmit from dev_hard_start_xmit+0xc8/0x2c0
 dev_hard_start_xmit from sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x350
 sch_direct_xmit from __dev_queue_xmit+0x680/0x1440
 __dev_queue_xmit from packet_sendmsg+0xfa4/0x1568
 packet_sendmsg from __sys_sendto+0x110/0x19c
 __sys_sendto from sys_send+0x18/0x20
 sys_send from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
Exception stack(0xf0b05fa8 to 0xf0b05ff0)
5fa0:                   00000001 0000000 0000000 0004b47a 0000003a 00000000
5fc0: 00000001 0000000 00000000 00000121 0004af58 00044874 00000000 00000000
5fe0: 00000001 bee9d420 00025a10 b6e75c7c

So, instead of using the ts_lock for tx_queue, use the spinlock that
skb_buff_head has.

Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <[email protected]>
Fixes: 7d272e6 ("net: phy: mscc: timestamping and PHC support")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo pushed a commit to linux-netdev/testing that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2025
When transmitting a PTP frame which is timestamp using 2 step, the
following warning appears if CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 Not tainted
-----------------------------
ptp4l/119 is trying to lock:
c2a44ed4 (&vsc8531->ts_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{4:4}
4 locks held by ptp4l/119:
 #0: c145f068 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x58/0x1440
 #1: c29df974 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x5c4/0x1440
 #2: c2aaaad0 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sch_direct_xmit+0x108/0x350
 #3: c2aac170 (&lan966x->tx_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: lan966x_port_xmit+0xd0/0x350
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 119 Comm: ptp4l Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 NONE
Hardware name: Generic DT based system
Call trace:
 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x7c/0xac
 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x8e8/0x29dc
 __lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0x108/0x38c
 lock_acquire from __mutex_lock+0xb0/0xe78
 __mutex_lock from mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
 mutex_lock_nested from vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
 vsc85xx_txtstamp from lan966x_fdma_xmit+0xd8/0x3a8
 lan966x_fdma_xmit from lan966x_port_xmit+0x1bc/0x350
 lan966x_port_xmit from dev_hard_start_xmit+0xc8/0x2c0
 dev_hard_start_xmit from sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x350
 sch_direct_xmit from __dev_queue_xmit+0x680/0x1440
 __dev_queue_xmit from packet_sendmsg+0xfa4/0x1568
 packet_sendmsg from __sys_sendto+0x110/0x19c
 __sys_sendto from sys_send+0x18/0x20
 sys_send from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
Exception stack(0xf0b05fa8 to 0xf0b05ff0)
5fa0:                   00000001 0000000 0000000 0004b47a 0000003a 00000000
5fc0: 00000001 0000000 00000000 00000121 0004af58 00044874 00000000 00000000
5fe0: 00000001 bee9d420 00025a10 b6e75c7c

So, instead of using the ts_lock for tx_queue, use the spinlock that
skb_buff_head has.

Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <[email protected]>
Fixes: 7d272e6 ("net: phy: mscc: timestamping and PHC support")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo pushed a commit to linux-netdev/testing that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2025
When transmitting a PTP frame which is timestamp using 2 step, the
following warning appears if CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 Not tainted
-----------------------------
ptp4l/119 is trying to lock:
c2a44ed4 (&vsc8531->ts_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{4:4}
4 locks held by ptp4l/119:
 #0: c145f068 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x58/0x1440
 #1: c29df974 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x5c4/0x1440
 #2: c2aaaad0 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sch_direct_xmit+0x108/0x350
 #3: c2aac170 (&lan966x->tx_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: lan966x_port_xmit+0xd0/0x350
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 119 Comm: ptp4l Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 NONE
Hardware name: Generic DT based system
Call trace:
 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x7c/0xac
 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x8e8/0x29dc
 __lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0x108/0x38c
 lock_acquire from __mutex_lock+0xb0/0xe78
 __mutex_lock from mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
 mutex_lock_nested from vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
 vsc85xx_txtstamp from lan966x_fdma_xmit+0xd8/0x3a8
 lan966x_fdma_xmit from lan966x_port_xmit+0x1bc/0x350
 lan966x_port_xmit from dev_hard_start_xmit+0xc8/0x2c0
 dev_hard_start_xmit from sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x350
 sch_direct_xmit from __dev_queue_xmit+0x680/0x1440
 __dev_queue_xmit from packet_sendmsg+0xfa4/0x1568
 packet_sendmsg from __sys_sendto+0x110/0x19c
 __sys_sendto from sys_send+0x18/0x20
 sys_send from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
Exception stack(0xf0b05fa8 to 0xf0b05ff0)
5fa0:                   00000001 0000000 0000000 0004b47a 0000003a 00000000
5fc0: 00000001 0000000 00000000 00000121 0004af58 00044874 00000000 00000000
5fe0: 00000001 bee9d420 00025a10 b6e75c7c

So, instead of using the ts_lock for tx_queue, use the spinlock that
skb_buff_head has.

Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <[email protected]>
Fixes: 7d272e6 ("net: phy: mscc: timestamping and PHC support")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo pushed a commit to linux-netdev/testing that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2025
When transmitting a PTP frame which is timestamp using 2 step, the
following warning appears if CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 Not tainted
-----------------------------
ptp4l/119 is trying to lock:
c2a44ed4 (&vsc8531->ts_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{4:4}
4 locks held by ptp4l/119:
 #0: c145f068 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x58/0x1440
 #1: c29df974 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x5c4/0x1440
 #2: c2aaaad0 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sch_direct_xmit+0x108/0x350
 #3: c2aac170 (&lan966x->tx_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: lan966x_port_xmit+0xd0/0x350
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 119 Comm: ptp4l Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 NONE
Hardware name: Generic DT based system
Call trace:
 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x7c/0xac
 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x8e8/0x29dc
 __lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0x108/0x38c
 lock_acquire from __mutex_lock+0xb0/0xe78
 __mutex_lock from mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
 mutex_lock_nested from vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
 vsc85xx_txtstamp from lan966x_fdma_xmit+0xd8/0x3a8
 lan966x_fdma_xmit from lan966x_port_xmit+0x1bc/0x350
 lan966x_port_xmit from dev_hard_start_xmit+0xc8/0x2c0
 dev_hard_start_xmit from sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x350
 sch_direct_xmit from __dev_queue_xmit+0x680/0x1440
 __dev_queue_xmit from packet_sendmsg+0xfa4/0x1568
 packet_sendmsg from __sys_sendto+0x110/0x19c
 __sys_sendto from sys_send+0x18/0x20
 sys_send from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
Exception stack(0xf0b05fa8 to 0xf0b05ff0)
5fa0:                   00000001 0000000 0000000 0004b47a 0000003a 00000000
5fc0: 00000001 0000000 00000000 00000121 0004af58 00044874 00000000 00000000
5fe0: 00000001 bee9d420 00025a10 b6e75c7c

So, instead of using the ts_lock for tx_queue, use the spinlock that
skb_buff_head has.

Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <[email protected]>
Fixes: 7d272e6 ("net: phy: mscc: timestamping and PHC support")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo pushed a commit to linux-netdev/testing that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2025
When transmitting a PTP frame which is timestamp using 2 step, the
following warning appears if CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 Not tainted
-----------------------------
ptp4l/119 is trying to lock:
c2a44ed4 (&vsc8531->ts_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{4:4}
4 locks held by ptp4l/119:
 #0: c145f068 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x58/0x1440
 #1: c29df974 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x5c4/0x1440
 #2: c2aaaad0 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sch_direct_xmit+0x108/0x350
 #3: c2aac170 (&lan966x->tx_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: lan966x_port_xmit+0xd0/0x350
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 119 Comm: ptp4l Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 NONE
Hardware name: Generic DT based system
Call trace:
 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x7c/0xac
 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x8e8/0x29dc
 __lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0x108/0x38c
 lock_acquire from __mutex_lock+0xb0/0xe78
 __mutex_lock from mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
 mutex_lock_nested from vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
 vsc85xx_txtstamp from lan966x_fdma_xmit+0xd8/0x3a8
 lan966x_fdma_xmit from lan966x_port_xmit+0x1bc/0x350
 lan966x_port_xmit from dev_hard_start_xmit+0xc8/0x2c0
 dev_hard_start_xmit from sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x350
 sch_direct_xmit from __dev_queue_xmit+0x680/0x1440
 __dev_queue_xmit from packet_sendmsg+0xfa4/0x1568
 packet_sendmsg from __sys_sendto+0x110/0x19c
 __sys_sendto from sys_send+0x18/0x20
 sys_send from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
Exception stack(0xf0b05fa8 to 0xf0b05ff0)
5fa0:                   00000001 0000000 0000000 0004b47a 0000003a 00000000
5fc0: 00000001 0000000 00000000 00000121 0004af58 00044874 00000000 00000000
5fe0: 00000001 bee9d420 00025a10 b6e75c7c

So, instead of using the ts_lock for tx_queue, use the spinlock that
skb_buff_head has.

Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <[email protected]>
Fixes: 7d272e6 ("net: phy: mscc: timestamping and PHC support")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo pushed a commit to linux-netdev/testing that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2025
When transmitting a PTP frame which is timestamp using 2 step, the
following warning appears if CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 Not tainted
-----------------------------
ptp4l/119 is trying to lock:
c2a44ed4 (&vsc8531->ts_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{4:4}
4 locks held by ptp4l/119:
 #0: c145f068 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x58/0x1440
 #1: c29df974 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x5c4/0x1440
 #2: c2aaaad0 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sch_direct_xmit+0x108/0x350
 #3: c2aac170 (&lan966x->tx_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: lan966x_port_xmit+0xd0/0x350
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 119 Comm: ptp4l Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 NONE
Hardware name: Generic DT based system
Call trace:
 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x7c/0xac
 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x8e8/0x29dc
 __lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0x108/0x38c
 lock_acquire from __mutex_lock+0xb0/0xe78
 __mutex_lock from mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
 mutex_lock_nested from vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
 vsc85xx_txtstamp from lan966x_fdma_xmit+0xd8/0x3a8
 lan966x_fdma_xmit from lan966x_port_xmit+0x1bc/0x350
 lan966x_port_xmit from dev_hard_start_xmit+0xc8/0x2c0
 dev_hard_start_xmit from sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x350
 sch_direct_xmit from __dev_queue_xmit+0x680/0x1440
 __dev_queue_xmit from packet_sendmsg+0xfa4/0x1568
 packet_sendmsg from __sys_sendto+0x110/0x19c
 __sys_sendto from sys_send+0x18/0x20
 sys_send from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
Exception stack(0xf0b05fa8 to 0xf0b05ff0)
5fa0:                   00000001 0000000 0000000 0004b47a 0000003a 00000000
5fc0: 00000001 0000000 00000000 00000121 0004af58 00044874 00000000 00000000
5fe0: 00000001 bee9d420 00025a10 b6e75c7c

So, instead of using the ts_lock for tx_queue, use the spinlock that
skb_buff_head has.

Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <[email protected]>
Fixes: 7d272e6 ("net: phy: mscc: timestamping and PHC support")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo pushed a commit to linux-netdev/testing that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2025
When transmitting a PTP frame which is timestamp using 2 step, the
following warning appears if CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 Not tainted
-----------------------------
ptp4l/119 is trying to lock:
c2a44ed4 (&vsc8531->ts_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{4:4}
4 locks held by ptp4l/119:
 #0: c145f068 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x58/0x1440
 #1: c29df974 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x5c4/0x1440
 #2: c2aaaad0 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sch_direct_xmit+0x108/0x350
 #3: c2aac170 (&lan966x->tx_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: lan966x_port_xmit+0xd0/0x350
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 119 Comm: ptp4l Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 NONE
Hardware name: Generic DT based system
Call trace:
 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x7c/0xac
 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x8e8/0x29dc
 __lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0x108/0x38c
 lock_acquire from __mutex_lock+0xb0/0xe78
 __mutex_lock from mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
 mutex_lock_nested from vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
 vsc85xx_txtstamp from lan966x_fdma_xmit+0xd8/0x3a8
 lan966x_fdma_xmit from lan966x_port_xmit+0x1bc/0x350
 lan966x_port_xmit from dev_hard_start_xmit+0xc8/0x2c0
 dev_hard_start_xmit from sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x350
 sch_direct_xmit from __dev_queue_xmit+0x680/0x1440
 __dev_queue_xmit from packet_sendmsg+0xfa4/0x1568
 packet_sendmsg from __sys_sendto+0x110/0x19c
 __sys_sendto from sys_send+0x18/0x20
 sys_send from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
Exception stack(0xf0b05fa8 to 0xf0b05ff0)
5fa0:                   00000001 0000000 0000000 0004b47a 0000003a 00000000
5fc0: 00000001 0000000 00000000 00000121 0004af58 00044874 00000000 00000000
5fe0: 00000001 bee9d420 00025a10 b6e75c7c

So, instead of using the ts_lock for tx_queue, use the spinlock that
skb_buff_head has.

Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <[email protected]>
Fixes: 7d272e6 ("net: phy: mscc: timestamping and PHC support")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo pushed a commit to linux-netdev/testing that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2025
When transmitting a PTP frame which is timestamp using 2 step, the
following warning appears if CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 Not tainted
-----------------------------
ptp4l/119 is trying to lock:
c2a44ed4 (&vsc8531->ts_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{4:4}
4 locks held by ptp4l/119:
 #0: c145f068 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x58/0x1440
 #1: c29df974 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x5c4/0x1440
 #2: c2aaaad0 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sch_direct_xmit+0x108/0x350
 #3: c2aac170 (&lan966x->tx_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: lan966x_port_xmit+0xd0/0x350
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 119 Comm: ptp4l Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 NONE
Hardware name: Generic DT based system
Call trace:
 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x7c/0xac
 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x8e8/0x29dc
 __lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0x108/0x38c
 lock_acquire from __mutex_lock+0xb0/0xe78
 __mutex_lock from mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
 mutex_lock_nested from vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
 vsc85xx_txtstamp from lan966x_fdma_xmit+0xd8/0x3a8
 lan966x_fdma_xmit from lan966x_port_xmit+0x1bc/0x350
 lan966x_port_xmit from dev_hard_start_xmit+0xc8/0x2c0
 dev_hard_start_xmit from sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x350
 sch_direct_xmit from __dev_queue_xmit+0x680/0x1440
 __dev_queue_xmit from packet_sendmsg+0xfa4/0x1568
 packet_sendmsg from __sys_sendto+0x110/0x19c
 __sys_sendto from sys_send+0x18/0x20
 sys_send from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
Exception stack(0xf0b05fa8 to 0xf0b05ff0)
5fa0:                   00000001 0000000 0000000 0004b47a 0000003a 00000000
5fc0: 00000001 0000000 00000000 00000121 0004af58 00044874 00000000 00000000
5fe0: 00000001 bee9d420 00025a10 b6e75c7c

So, instead of using the ts_lock for tx_queue, use the spinlock that
skb_buff_head has.

Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <[email protected]>
Fixes: 7d272e6 ("net: phy: mscc: timestamping and PHC support")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo pushed a commit to linux-netdev/testing that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2025
When transmitting a PTP frame which is timestamp using 2 step, the
following warning appears if CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 Not tainted
-----------------------------
ptp4l/119 is trying to lock:
c2a44ed4 (&vsc8531->ts_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{4:4}
4 locks held by ptp4l/119:
 #0: c145f068 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x58/0x1440
 #1: c29df974 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x5c4/0x1440
 #2: c2aaaad0 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sch_direct_xmit+0x108/0x350
 #3: c2aac170 (&lan966x->tx_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: lan966x_port_xmit+0xd0/0x350
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 119 Comm: ptp4l Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 NONE
Hardware name: Generic DT based system
Call trace:
 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x7c/0xac
 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x8e8/0x29dc
 __lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0x108/0x38c
 lock_acquire from __mutex_lock+0xb0/0xe78
 __mutex_lock from mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
 mutex_lock_nested from vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
 vsc85xx_txtstamp from lan966x_fdma_xmit+0xd8/0x3a8
 lan966x_fdma_xmit from lan966x_port_xmit+0x1bc/0x350
 lan966x_port_xmit from dev_hard_start_xmit+0xc8/0x2c0
 dev_hard_start_xmit from sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x350
 sch_direct_xmit from __dev_queue_xmit+0x680/0x1440
 __dev_queue_xmit from packet_sendmsg+0xfa4/0x1568
 packet_sendmsg from __sys_sendto+0x110/0x19c
 __sys_sendto from sys_send+0x18/0x20
 sys_send from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
Exception stack(0xf0b05fa8 to 0xf0b05ff0)
5fa0:                   00000001 0000000 0000000 0004b47a 0000003a 00000000
5fc0: 00000001 0000000 00000000 00000121 0004af58 00044874 00000000 00000000
5fe0: 00000001 bee9d420 00025a10 b6e75c7c

So, instead of using the ts_lock for tx_queue, use the spinlock that
skb_buff_head has.

Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <[email protected]>
Fixes: 7d272e6 ("net: phy: mscc: timestamping and PHC support")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo pushed a commit to linux-netdev/testing that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2025
When transmitting a PTP frame which is timestamp using 2 step, the
following warning appears if CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 Not tainted
-----------------------------
ptp4l/119 is trying to lock:
c2a44ed4 (&vsc8531->ts_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{4:4}
4 locks held by ptp4l/119:
 #0: c145f068 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x58/0x1440
 #1: c29df974 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x5c4/0x1440
 #2: c2aaaad0 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sch_direct_xmit+0x108/0x350
 #3: c2aac170 (&lan966x->tx_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: lan966x_port_xmit+0xd0/0x350
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 119 Comm: ptp4l Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 NONE
Hardware name: Generic DT based system
Call trace:
 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x7c/0xac
 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x8e8/0x29dc
 __lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0x108/0x38c
 lock_acquire from __mutex_lock+0xb0/0xe78
 __mutex_lock from mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
 mutex_lock_nested from vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
 vsc85xx_txtstamp from lan966x_fdma_xmit+0xd8/0x3a8
 lan966x_fdma_xmit from lan966x_port_xmit+0x1bc/0x350
 lan966x_port_xmit from dev_hard_start_xmit+0xc8/0x2c0
 dev_hard_start_xmit from sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x350
 sch_direct_xmit from __dev_queue_xmit+0x680/0x1440
 __dev_queue_xmit from packet_sendmsg+0xfa4/0x1568
 packet_sendmsg from __sys_sendto+0x110/0x19c
 __sys_sendto from sys_send+0x18/0x20
 sys_send from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
Exception stack(0xf0b05fa8 to 0xf0b05ff0)
5fa0:                   00000001 0000000 0000000 0004b47a 0000003a 00000000
5fc0: 00000001 0000000 00000000 00000121 0004af58 00044874 00000000 00000000
5fe0: 00000001 bee9d420 00025a10 b6e75c7c

So, instead of using the ts_lock for tx_queue, use the spinlock that
skb_buff_head has.

Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <[email protected]>
Fixes: 7d272e6 ("net: phy: mscc: timestamping and PHC support")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo pushed a commit to linux-netdev/testing that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2025
When transmitting a PTP frame which is timestamp using 2 step, the
following warning appears if CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 Not tainted
-----------------------------
ptp4l/119 is trying to lock:
c2a44ed4 (&vsc8531->ts_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{4:4}
4 locks held by ptp4l/119:
 #0: c145f068 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x58/0x1440
 #1: c29df974 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x5c4/0x1440
 #2: c2aaaad0 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sch_direct_xmit+0x108/0x350
 #3: c2aac170 (&lan966x->tx_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: lan966x_port_xmit+0xd0/0x350
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 119 Comm: ptp4l Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 NONE
Hardware name: Generic DT based system
Call trace:
 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x7c/0xac
 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x8e8/0x29dc
 __lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0x108/0x38c
 lock_acquire from __mutex_lock+0xb0/0xe78
 __mutex_lock from mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
 mutex_lock_nested from vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
 vsc85xx_txtstamp from lan966x_fdma_xmit+0xd8/0x3a8
 lan966x_fdma_xmit from lan966x_port_xmit+0x1bc/0x350
 lan966x_port_xmit from dev_hard_start_xmit+0xc8/0x2c0
 dev_hard_start_xmit from sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x350
 sch_direct_xmit from __dev_queue_xmit+0x680/0x1440
 __dev_queue_xmit from packet_sendmsg+0xfa4/0x1568
 packet_sendmsg from __sys_sendto+0x110/0x19c
 __sys_sendto from sys_send+0x18/0x20
 sys_send from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
Exception stack(0xf0b05fa8 to 0xf0b05ff0)
5fa0:                   00000001 0000000 0000000 0004b47a 0000003a 00000000
5fc0: 00000001 0000000 00000000 00000121 0004af58 00044874 00000000 00000000
5fe0: 00000001 bee9d420 00025a10 b6e75c7c

So, instead of using the ts_lock for tx_queue, use the spinlock that
skb_buff_head has.

Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <[email protected]>
Fixes: 7d272e6 ("net: phy: mscc: timestamping and PHC support")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo pushed a commit to linux-netdev/testing that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2025
When transmitting a PTP frame which is timestamp using 2 step, the
following warning appears if CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 Not tainted
-----------------------------
ptp4l/119 is trying to lock:
c2a44ed4 (&vsc8531->ts_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{4:4}
4 locks held by ptp4l/119:
 #0: c145f068 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x58/0x1440
 #1: c29df974 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x5c4/0x1440
 #2: c2aaaad0 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sch_direct_xmit+0x108/0x350
 #3: c2aac170 (&lan966x->tx_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: lan966x_port_xmit+0xd0/0x350
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 119 Comm: ptp4l Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 NONE
Hardware name: Generic DT based system
Call trace:
 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x7c/0xac
 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x8e8/0x29dc
 __lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0x108/0x38c
 lock_acquire from __mutex_lock+0xb0/0xe78
 __mutex_lock from mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
 mutex_lock_nested from vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
 vsc85xx_txtstamp from lan966x_fdma_xmit+0xd8/0x3a8
 lan966x_fdma_xmit from lan966x_port_xmit+0x1bc/0x350
 lan966x_port_xmit from dev_hard_start_xmit+0xc8/0x2c0
 dev_hard_start_xmit from sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x350
 sch_direct_xmit from __dev_queue_xmit+0x680/0x1440
 __dev_queue_xmit from packet_sendmsg+0xfa4/0x1568
 packet_sendmsg from __sys_sendto+0x110/0x19c
 __sys_sendto from sys_send+0x18/0x20
 sys_send from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
Exception stack(0xf0b05fa8 to 0xf0b05ff0)
5fa0:                   00000001 0000000 0000000 0004b47a 0000003a 00000000
5fc0: 00000001 0000000 00000000 00000121 0004af58 00044874 00000000 00000000
5fe0: 00000001 bee9d420 00025a10 b6e75c7c

So, instead of using the ts_lock for tx_queue, use the spinlock that
skb_buff_head has.

Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <[email protected]>
Fixes: 7d272e6 ("net: phy: mscc: timestamping and PHC support")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
mj22226 pushed a commit to mj22226/linux that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2025
[ Upstream commit 9b2bfdb ]

When transmitting a PTP frame which is timestamp using 2 step, the
following warning appears if CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 Not tainted
-----------------------------
ptp4l/119 is trying to lock:
c2a44ed4 (&vsc8531->ts_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{4:4}
4 locks held by ptp4l/119:
 #0: c145f068 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x58/0x1440
 #1: c29df974 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x5c4/0x1440
 #2: c2aaaad0 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sch_direct_xmit+0x108/0x350
 #3: c2aac170 (&lan966x->tx_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: lan966x_port_xmit+0xd0/0x350
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 119 Comm: ptp4l Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 NONE
Hardware name: Generic DT based system
Call trace:
 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x7c/0xac
 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x8e8/0x29dc
 __lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0x108/0x38c
 lock_acquire from __mutex_lock+0xb0/0xe78
 __mutex_lock from mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
 mutex_lock_nested from vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
 vsc85xx_txtstamp from lan966x_fdma_xmit+0xd8/0x3a8
 lan966x_fdma_xmit from lan966x_port_xmit+0x1bc/0x350
 lan966x_port_xmit from dev_hard_start_xmit+0xc8/0x2c0
 dev_hard_start_xmit from sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x350
 sch_direct_xmit from __dev_queue_xmit+0x680/0x1440
 __dev_queue_xmit from packet_sendmsg+0xfa4/0x1568
 packet_sendmsg from __sys_sendto+0x110/0x19c
 __sys_sendto from sys_send+0x18/0x20
 sys_send from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
Exception stack(0xf0b05fa8 to 0xf0b05ff0)
5fa0:                   00000001 0000000 0000000 0004b47a 0000003a 00000000
5fc0: 00000001 0000000 00000000 00000121 0004af58 00044874 00000000 00000000
5fe0: 00000001 bee9d420 00025a10 b6e75c7c

So, instead of using the ts_lock for tx_queue, use the spinlock that
skb_buff_head has.

Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <[email protected]>
Fixes: 7d272e6 ("net: phy: mscc: timestamping and PHC support")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
mj22226 pushed a commit to mj22226/linux that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2025
[ Upstream commit 9b2bfdb ]

When transmitting a PTP frame which is timestamp using 2 step, the
following warning appears if CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 Not tainted
-----------------------------
ptp4l/119 is trying to lock:
c2a44ed4 (&vsc8531->ts_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{4:4}
4 locks held by ptp4l/119:
 #0: c145f068 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x58/0x1440
 #1: c29df974 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x5c4/0x1440
 #2: c2aaaad0 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sch_direct_xmit+0x108/0x350
 #3: c2aac170 (&lan966x->tx_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: lan966x_port_xmit+0xd0/0x350
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 119 Comm: ptp4l Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 NONE
Hardware name: Generic DT based system
Call trace:
 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x7c/0xac
 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x8e8/0x29dc
 __lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0x108/0x38c
 lock_acquire from __mutex_lock+0xb0/0xe78
 __mutex_lock from mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
 mutex_lock_nested from vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
 vsc85xx_txtstamp from lan966x_fdma_xmit+0xd8/0x3a8
 lan966x_fdma_xmit from lan966x_port_xmit+0x1bc/0x350
 lan966x_port_xmit from dev_hard_start_xmit+0xc8/0x2c0
 dev_hard_start_xmit from sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x350
 sch_direct_xmit from __dev_queue_xmit+0x680/0x1440
 __dev_queue_xmit from packet_sendmsg+0xfa4/0x1568
 packet_sendmsg from __sys_sendto+0x110/0x19c
 __sys_sendto from sys_send+0x18/0x20
 sys_send from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
Exception stack(0xf0b05fa8 to 0xf0b05ff0)
5fa0:                   00000001 0000000 0000000 0004b47a 0000003a 00000000
5fc0: 00000001 0000000 00000000 00000121 0004af58 00044874 00000000 00000000
5fe0: 00000001 bee9d420 00025a10 b6e75c7c

So, instead of using the ts_lock for tx_queue, use the spinlock that
skb_buff_head has.

Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <[email protected]>
Fixes: 7d272e6 ("net: phy: mscc: timestamping and PHC support")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
mj22226 pushed a commit to mj22226/linux that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2025
[ Upstream commit 9b2bfdb ]

When transmitting a PTP frame which is timestamp using 2 step, the
following warning appears if CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 Not tainted
-----------------------------
ptp4l/119 is trying to lock:
c2a44ed4 (&vsc8531->ts_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{4:4}
4 locks held by ptp4l/119:
 #0: c145f068 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x58/0x1440
 #1: c29df974 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x5c4/0x1440
 #2: c2aaaad0 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sch_direct_xmit+0x108/0x350
 #3: c2aac170 (&lan966x->tx_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: lan966x_port_xmit+0xd0/0x350
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 119 Comm: ptp4l Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 NONE
Hardware name: Generic DT based system
Call trace:
 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x7c/0xac
 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x8e8/0x29dc
 __lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0x108/0x38c
 lock_acquire from __mutex_lock+0xb0/0xe78
 __mutex_lock from mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
 mutex_lock_nested from vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
 vsc85xx_txtstamp from lan966x_fdma_xmit+0xd8/0x3a8
 lan966x_fdma_xmit from lan966x_port_xmit+0x1bc/0x350
 lan966x_port_xmit from dev_hard_start_xmit+0xc8/0x2c0
 dev_hard_start_xmit from sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x350
 sch_direct_xmit from __dev_queue_xmit+0x680/0x1440
 __dev_queue_xmit from packet_sendmsg+0xfa4/0x1568
 packet_sendmsg from __sys_sendto+0x110/0x19c
 __sys_sendto from sys_send+0x18/0x20
 sys_send from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
Exception stack(0xf0b05fa8 to 0xf0b05ff0)
5fa0:                   00000001 0000000 0000000 0004b47a 0000003a 00000000
5fc0: 00000001 0000000 00000000 00000121 0004af58 00044874 00000000 00000000
5fe0: 00000001 bee9d420 00025a10 b6e75c7c

So, instead of using the ts_lock for tx_queue, use the spinlock that
skb_buff_head has.

Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <[email protected]>
Fixes: 7d272e6 ("net: phy: mscc: timestamping and PHC support")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
mj22226 pushed a commit to mj22226/linux that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2025
[ Upstream commit 9b2bfdb ]

When transmitting a PTP frame which is timestamp using 2 step, the
following warning appears if CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 Not tainted
-----------------------------
ptp4l/119 is trying to lock:
c2a44ed4 (&vsc8531->ts_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{4:4}
4 locks held by ptp4l/119:
 #0: c145f068 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x58/0x1440
 #1: c29df974 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x5c4/0x1440
 #2: c2aaaad0 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sch_direct_xmit+0x108/0x350
 #3: c2aac170 (&lan966x->tx_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: lan966x_port_xmit+0xd0/0x350
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 119 Comm: ptp4l Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 NONE
Hardware name: Generic DT based system
Call trace:
 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x7c/0xac
 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x8e8/0x29dc
 __lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0x108/0x38c
 lock_acquire from __mutex_lock+0xb0/0xe78
 __mutex_lock from mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
 mutex_lock_nested from vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
 vsc85xx_txtstamp from lan966x_fdma_xmit+0xd8/0x3a8
 lan966x_fdma_xmit from lan966x_port_xmit+0x1bc/0x350
 lan966x_port_xmit from dev_hard_start_xmit+0xc8/0x2c0
 dev_hard_start_xmit from sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x350
 sch_direct_xmit from __dev_queue_xmit+0x680/0x1440
 __dev_queue_xmit from packet_sendmsg+0xfa4/0x1568
 packet_sendmsg from __sys_sendto+0x110/0x19c
 __sys_sendto from sys_send+0x18/0x20
 sys_send from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
Exception stack(0xf0b05fa8 to 0xf0b05ff0)
5fa0:                   00000001 0000000 0000000 0004b47a 0000003a 00000000
5fc0: 00000001 0000000 00000000 00000121 0004af58 00044874 00000000 00000000
5fe0: 00000001 bee9d420 00025a10 b6e75c7c

So, instead of using the ts_lock for tx_queue, use the spinlock that
skb_buff_head has.

Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <[email protected]>
Fixes: 7d272e6 ("net: phy: mscc: timestamping and PHC support")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ptr1337 pushed a commit to CachyOS/linux that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2025
[ Upstream commit 9b2bfdb ]

When transmitting a PTP frame which is timestamp using 2 step, the
following warning appears if CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 Not tainted
-----------------------------
ptp4l/119 is trying to lock:
c2a44ed4 (&vsc8531->ts_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{4:4}
4 locks held by ptp4l/119:
 #0: c145f068 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x58/0x1440
 #1: c29df974 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x5c4/0x1440
 #2: c2aaaad0 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sch_direct_xmit+0x108/0x350
 #3: c2aac170 (&lan966x->tx_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: lan966x_port_xmit+0xd0/0x350
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 119 Comm: ptp4l Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 NONE
Hardware name: Generic DT based system
Call trace:
 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x7c/0xac
 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x8e8/0x29dc
 __lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0x108/0x38c
 lock_acquire from __mutex_lock+0xb0/0xe78
 __mutex_lock from mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
 mutex_lock_nested from vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
 vsc85xx_txtstamp from lan966x_fdma_xmit+0xd8/0x3a8
 lan966x_fdma_xmit from lan966x_port_xmit+0x1bc/0x350
 lan966x_port_xmit from dev_hard_start_xmit+0xc8/0x2c0
 dev_hard_start_xmit from sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x350
 sch_direct_xmit from __dev_queue_xmit+0x680/0x1440
 __dev_queue_xmit from packet_sendmsg+0xfa4/0x1568
 packet_sendmsg from __sys_sendto+0x110/0x19c
 __sys_sendto from sys_send+0x18/0x20
 sys_send from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
Exception stack(0xf0b05fa8 to 0xf0b05ff0)
5fa0:                   00000001 0000000 0000000 0004b47a 0000003a 00000000
5fc0: 00000001 0000000 00000000 00000121 0004af58 00044874 00000000 00000000
5fe0: 00000001 bee9d420 00025a10 b6e75c7c

So, instead of using the ts_lock for tx_queue, use the spinlock that
skb_buff_head has.

Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <[email protected]>
Fixes: 7d272e6 ("net: phy: mscc: timestamping and PHC support")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
1054009064 pushed a commit to 1054009064/linux that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2025
[ Upstream commit 9b2bfdb ]

When transmitting a PTP frame which is timestamp using 2 step, the
following warning appears if CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 Not tainted
-----------------------------
ptp4l/119 is trying to lock:
c2a44ed4 (&vsc8531->ts_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{4:4}
4 locks held by ptp4l/119:
 #0: c145f068 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x58/0x1440
 #1: c29df974 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x5c4/0x1440
 #2: c2aaaad0 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sch_direct_xmit+0x108/0x350
 #3: c2aac170 (&lan966x->tx_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: lan966x_port_xmit+0xd0/0x350
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 119 Comm: ptp4l Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 NONE
Hardware name: Generic DT based system
Call trace:
 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x7c/0xac
 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x8e8/0x29dc
 __lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0x108/0x38c
 lock_acquire from __mutex_lock+0xb0/0xe78
 __mutex_lock from mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
 mutex_lock_nested from vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
 vsc85xx_txtstamp from lan966x_fdma_xmit+0xd8/0x3a8
 lan966x_fdma_xmit from lan966x_port_xmit+0x1bc/0x350
 lan966x_port_xmit from dev_hard_start_xmit+0xc8/0x2c0
 dev_hard_start_xmit from sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x350
 sch_direct_xmit from __dev_queue_xmit+0x680/0x1440
 __dev_queue_xmit from packet_sendmsg+0xfa4/0x1568
 packet_sendmsg from __sys_sendto+0x110/0x19c
 __sys_sendto from sys_send+0x18/0x20
 sys_send from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
Exception stack(0xf0b05fa8 to 0xf0b05ff0)
5fa0:                   00000001 0000000 0000000 0004b47a 0000003a 00000000
5fc0: 00000001 0000000 00000000 00000121 0004af58 00044874 00000000 00000000
5fe0: 00000001 bee9d420 00025a10 b6e75c7c

So, instead of using the ts_lock for tx_queue, use the spinlock that
skb_buff_head has.

Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <[email protected]>
Fixes: 7d272e6 ("net: phy: mscc: timestamping and PHC support")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
1054009064 pushed a commit to 1054009064/linux that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2025
[ Upstream commit 9b2bfdb ]

When transmitting a PTP frame which is timestamp using 2 step, the
following warning appears if CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 Not tainted
-----------------------------
ptp4l/119 is trying to lock:
c2a44ed4 (&vsc8531->ts_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{4:4}
4 locks held by ptp4l/119:
 #0: c145f068 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x58/0x1440
 #1: c29df974 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x5c4/0x1440
 #2: c2aaaad0 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sch_direct_xmit+0x108/0x350
 #3: c2aac170 (&lan966x->tx_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: lan966x_port_xmit+0xd0/0x350
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 119 Comm: ptp4l Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 NONE
Hardware name: Generic DT based system
Call trace:
 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x7c/0xac
 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x8e8/0x29dc
 __lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0x108/0x38c
 lock_acquire from __mutex_lock+0xb0/0xe78
 __mutex_lock from mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
 mutex_lock_nested from vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
 vsc85xx_txtstamp from lan966x_fdma_xmit+0xd8/0x3a8
 lan966x_fdma_xmit from lan966x_port_xmit+0x1bc/0x350
 lan966x_port_xmit from dev_hard_start_xmit+0xc8/0x2c0
 dev_hard_start_xmit from sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x350
 sch_direct_xmit from __dev_queue_xmit+0x680/0x1440
 __dev_queue_xmit from packet_sendmsg+0xfa4/0x1568
 packet_sendmsg from __sys_sendto+0x110/0x19c
 __sys_sendto from sys_send+0x18/0x20
 sys_send from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
Exception stack(0xf0b05fa8 to 0xf0b05ff0)
5fa0:                   00000001 0000000 0000000 0004b47a 0000003a 00000000
5fc0: 00000001 0000000 00000000 00000121 0004af58 00044874 00000000 00000000
5fe0: 00000001 bee9d420 00025a10 b6e75c7c

So, instead of using the ts_lock for tx_queue, use the spinlock that
skb_buff_head has.

Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <[email protected]>
Fixes: 7d272e6 ("net: phy: mscc: timestamping and PHC support")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
1054009064 pushed a commit to 1054009064/linux that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2025
[ Upstream commit 9b2bfdb ]

When transmitting a PTP frame which is timestamp using 2 step, the
following warning appears if CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 Not tainted
-----------------------------
ptp4l/119 is trying to lock:
c2a44ed4 (&vsc8531->ts_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{4:4}
4 locks held by ptp4l/119:
 #0: c145f068 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x58/0x1440
 #1: c29df974 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x5c4/0x1440
 #2: c2aaaad0 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sch_direct_xmit+0x108/0x350
 #3: c2aac170 (&lan966x->tx_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: lan966x_port_xmit+0xd0/0x350
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 119 Comm: ptp4l Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 NONE
Hardware name: Generic DT based system
Call trace:
 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x7c/0xac
 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x8e8/0x29dc
 __lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0x108/0x38c
 lock_acquire from __mutex_lock+0xb0/0xe78
 __mutex_lock from mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
 mutex_lock_nested from vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
 vsc85xx_txtstamp from lan966x_fdma_xmit+0xd8/0x3a8
 lan966x_fdma_xmit from lan966x_port_xmit+0x1bc/0x350
 lan966x_port_xmit from dev_hard_start_xmit+0xc8/0x2c0
 dev_hard_start_xmit from sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x350
 sch_direct_xmit from __dev_queue_xmit+0x680/0x1440
 __dev_queue_xmit from packet_sendmsg+0xfa4/0x1568
 packet_sendmsg from __sys_sendto+0x110/0x19c
 __sys_sendto from sys_send+0x18/0x20
 sys_send from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
Exception stack(0xf0b05fa8 to 0xf0b05ff0)
5fa0:                   00000001 0000000 0000000 0004b47a 0000003a 00000000
5fc0: 00000001 0000000 00000000 00000121 0004af58 00044874 00000000 00000000
5fe0: 00000001 bee9d420 00025a10 b6e75c7c

So, instead of using the ts_lock for tx_queue, use the spinlock that
skb_buff_head has.

Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <[email protected]>
Fixes: 7d272e6 ("net: phy: mscc: timestamping and PHC support")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
1054009064 pushed a commit to 1054009064/linux that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2025
[ Upstream commit 9b2bfdb ]

When transmitting a PTP frame which is timestamp using 2 step, the
following warning appears if CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 Not tainted
-----------------------------
ptp4l/119 is trying to lock:
c2a44ed4 (&vsc8531->ts_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{4:4}
4 locks held by ptp4l/119:
 #0: c145f068 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x58/0x1440
 #1: c29df974 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x5c4/0x1440
 #2: c2aaaad0 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sch_direct_xmit+0x108/0x350
 #3: c2aac170 (&lan966x->tx_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: lan966x_port_xmit+0xd0/0x350
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 119 Comm: ptp4l Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 NONE
Hardware name: Generic DT based system
Call trace:
 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x7c/0xac
 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x8e8/0x29dc
 __lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0x108/0x38c
 lock_acquire from __mutex_lock+0xb0/0xe78
 __mutex_lock from mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
 mutex_lock_nested from vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
 vsc85xx_txtstamp from lan966x_fdma_xmit+0xd8/0x3a8
 lan966x_fdma_xmit from lan966x_port_xmit+0x1bc/0x350
 lan966x_port_xmit from dev_hard_start_xmit+0xc8/0x2c0
 dev_hard_start_xmit from sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x350
 sch_direct_xmit from __dev_queue_xmit+0x680/0x1440
 __dev_queue_xmit from packet_sendmsg+0xfa4/0x1568
 packet_sendmsg from __sys_sendto+0x110/0x19c
 __sys_sendto from sys_send+0x18/0x20
 sys_send from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
Exception stack(0xf0b05fa8 to 0xf0b05ff0)
5fa0:                   00000001 0000000 0000000 0004b47a 0000003a 00000000
5fc0: 00000001 0000000 00000000 00000121 0004af58 00044874 00000000 00000000
5fe0: 00000001 bee9d420 00025a10 b6e75c7c

So, instead of using the ts_lock for tx_queue, use the spinlock that
skb_buff_head has.

Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <[email protected]>
Fixes: 7d272e6 ("net: phy: mscc: timestamping and PHC support")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
MatthewCroughan pushed a commit to MatthewCroughan/linux that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2025
When transmitting a PTP frame which is timestamp using 2 step, the
following warning appears if CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 Not tainted
-----------------------------
ptp4l/119 is trying to lock:
c2a44ed4 (&vsc8531->ts_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{4:4}
4 locks held by ptp4l/119:
 #0: c145f068 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x58/0x1440
 #1: c29df974 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x5c4/0x1440
 #2: c2aaaad0 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sch_direct_xmit+0x108/0x350
 #3: c2aac170 (&lan966x->tx_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: lan966x_port_xmit+0xd0/0x350
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 119 Comm: ptp4l Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1-00326-ge6160462704e torvalds#427 NONE
Hardware name: Generic DT based system
Call trace:
 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x7c/0xac
 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x8e8/0x29dc
 __lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0x108/0x38c
 lock_acquire from __mutex_lock+0xb0/0xe78
 __mutex_lock from mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
 mutex_lock_nested from vsc85xx_txtstamp+0x50/0xac
 vsc85xx_txtstamp from lan966x_fdma_xmit+0xd8/0x3a8
 lan966x_fdma_xmit from lan966x_port_xmit+0x1bc/0x350
 lan966x_port_xmit from dev_hard_start_xmit+0xc8/0x2c0
 dev_hard_start_xmit from sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x350
 sch_direct_xmit from __dev_queue_xmit+0x680/0x1440
 __dev_queue_xmit from packet_sendmsg+0xfa4/0x1568
 packet_sendmsg from __sys_sendto+0x110/0x19c
 __sys_sendto from sys_send+0x18/0x20
 sys_send from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
Exception stack(0xf0b05fa8 to 0xf0b05ff0)
5fa0:                   00000001 0000000 0000000 0004b47a 0000003a 00000000
5fc0: 00000001 0000000 00000000 00000121 0004af58 00044874 00000000 00000000
5fe0: 00000001 bee9d420 00025a10 b6e75c7c

So, instead of using the ts_lock for tx_queue, use the spinlock that
skb_buff_head has.

Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <[email protected]>
Fixes: 7d272e6 ("net: phy: mscc: timestamping and PHC support")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant