Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Small fixes in prep for v4 self-hosting #2018

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 2, 2025
Merged

Conversation

nicktrn
Copy link
Collaborator

@nicktrn nicktrn commented May 2, 2025

Fixes:

  • Entitlement validation
  • Supervisor builds on main

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores

    • Added a new publish workflow for worker version 4 in the deployment process.
    • Updated workflow names for clarity.
    • Disabled the step that pushes the 'v3' Docker image tag to the registry, preserving the code for future use.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved entitlement validation to only return an error when access is explicitly denied, not when the result is missing.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 2, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

This update modifies several GitHub Actions workflows and a TypeScript validator. In the workflows, a new job (publish-worker-v4) is added to .github/workflows/publish.yml, which depends on both typecheck and units jobs and uses a new reusable workflow. The workflow files for publishing the worker have had steps related to pushing a Docker image tagged as 'v3' commented out, effectively disabling this operation. In the application code, the logic for entitlement validation in triggerTaskValidator.ts is refined to only return an error when access is explicitly denied.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/publish-worker.yml
.github/workflows/publish-worker-v4.yml
Commented out the workflow step that pushes the 'v3' Docker image tag to the GitHub Container Registry.
.github/workflows/publish.yml Added a new job publish-worker-v4, which depends on typecheck and units, using a new reusable workflow.
apps/webapp/app/runEngine/validators/triggerTaskValidator.ts Changed entitlement validation logic to only error when access is explicitly denied, not when result is missing.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Developer
    participant GitHub Actions
    participant Registry

    Developer->>GitHub Actions: Push code / trigger workflow
    GitHub Actions->>GitHub Actions: Run typecheck
    GitHub Actions->>GitHub Actions: Run units
    GitHub Actions->>GitHub Actions: Run publish-worker
    GitHub Actions->>GitHub Actions: Run publish-worker-v4 (after typecheck & units)
    %% The step to push 'v3' tag is now commented out in both publish-worker workflows
    %% No push to Registry with 'v3' tag occurs
Loading

Possibly related PRs

  • triggerdotdev/trigger.dev#1306: Introduced and used semantic versioning checks and tagging logic in the publish-worker workflow, including the conditional push of the 'v3' tag.

Suggested reviewers

  • matt-aitken
  • ericallam

Poem

In the garden of workflows, a bunny did hop,
Commenting out 'v3' tags—no more registry drop.
A new v4 job joins the dance,
With checks and units in advance.
Entitlement logic, now more precise,
This codey carrot sure looks nice!
🥕


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dafe8f7 and 53e150a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/publish-worker-v4.yml (2 hunks)

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

recurseml bot commented May 2, 2025

✨ No issues found! Your code is sparkling clean! ✨

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
apps/webapp/app/runEngine/validators/triggerTaskValidator.ts (1)

49-49: Improved entitlement validation logic

This change refines the validation to only return an error when access is explicitly denied, rather than also returning an error when entitlement information is missing or indeterminate. This makes the validation more forgiving and is consistent with the "entitlement validation fix" mentioned in the PR objectives.

Consider adding a comment to explain the intended behavior:

+    // Only return an error when access is explicitly denied
     if (result && result.hasAccess === false) {
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4232096 and dafe8f7.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .github/workflows/publish-worker-re2.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/publish-worker.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/publish.yml (1 hunks)
  • apps/webapp/app/runEngine/validators/triggerTaskValidator.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/publish.yml

74-74: could not read reusable workflow file for "./.github/workflows/publish-worker-v4.yml": open /home/jailuser/git/.github/workflows/publish-worker-v4.yml: no such file or directory

(workflow-call)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - pnpm)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - npm)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - npm)
  • GitHub Check: typecheck / typecheck
  • GitHub Check: units / 🧪 Unit Tests
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/publish-worker-re2.yml (1)

88-95: Appropriate change for v4 preparation

This change disables the automatic tagging of Docker images as 'v3', which aligns with the PR objective of preparing for v4 self-hosting. By commenting out this step rather than removing it, you've preserved the code for reference while preventing creation of new v3-tagged images.

.github/workflows/publish-worker.yml (1)

80-87: Appropriate change for v4 preparation

This change disables the automatic tagging of Docker images as 'v3', consistent with the similar change in publish-worker-re2.yml and the overall PR objective of preparing for v4 self-hosting.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented May 2, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 53e150a

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@nicktrn nicktrn merged commit a10e2a8 into main May 2, 2025
4 of 5 checks passed
@nicktrn nicktrn deleted the fix/misc-self-hosting branch May 2, 2025 13:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants