Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@976520
Copy link
Contributor

@976520 976520 commented Jul 28, 2025

PR Checklist

Overview

The allowForKnownSafeCalls option was only checking type-based matching using typeMatchesSomeSpecifier and completely ignoring value-based (function name) matching. This caused configurations like ["randomAsyncFunction"] to be ignored, even though the documentation indicated they should work 💖

  • f4d5dae

    • Added specific test cases for string-based function name matching
  • 8c1cc90

    • First check value-based matching using valueMatchesSomeSpecifier for function names
    • Fall back to type-based matching using typeMatchesSomeSpecifier for type specifications
    • Added the missing import for valueMatchesSomeSpecifier
  • af92aea

    • Updated documentation and test snapshots
    • Removed unnecessary skipValidation from example

976520 added 3 commits July 28, 2025 19:31
… option

Add test cases to verify that function name-based allowForKnownSafeCalls
configuration works correctly for locally defined async functions.
…tion names (typescript-eslint#11423)

The allowForKnownSafeCalls option was only checking type-based matching
and not value-based matching, causing function name specifications like
["myAsyncFunction"] to be ignored. Now properly checks both value and
type matching using valueMatchesSomeSpecifier.
- Remove skipValidation from allowForKnownSafeCalls example
- Update test snapshots after fixing function name matching
@typescript-eslint
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR, @976520!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jul 28, 2025

Deploy Preview for typescript-eslint ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit ff2e5cd
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/typescript-eslint/deploys/68bc26b65757c30008e666c4
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-11430--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
1 paths audited
Performance: 97 (no change from production)
Accessibility: 97 (no change from production)
Best Practices: 100 (no change from production)
SEO: 92 (no change from production)
PWA: 80 (no change from production)
View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@nx-cloud
Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Jul 28, 2025

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit ff2e5cd

Command Status Duration Result
nx test eslint-plugin --coverage=false ✅ Succeeded 5m 6s View ↗
nx run-many -t lint ✅ Succeeded 3m 7s View ↗
nx run-many -t typecheck ✅ Succeeded 2m 1s View ↗
nx test eslint-plugin-internal --coverage=false ✅ Succeeded 4s View ↗
nx run generate-configs ✅ Succeeded 8s View ↗
nx test typescript-estree --coverage=false ✅ Succeeded 2s View ↗
nx run types:build ✅ Succeeded 5s View ↗
nx run integration-tests:test ✅ Succeeded 3s View ↗
Additional runs (27) ✅ Succeeded ... View ↗

☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2025-09-06 12:30:22 UTC

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 28, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.91%. Comparing base (fee2bc6) to head (ff2e5cd).
⚠️ Report is 64 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #11430      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.87%   90.91%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         505      505              
  Lines       51117    51163      +46     
  Branches     8415     8428      +13     
==========================================
+ Hits        46455    46516      +61     
+ Misses       4648     4634      -14     
+ Partials       14       13       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittest 90.91% <100.00%> (+0.03%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...es/eslint-plugin/src/rules/no-floating-promises.ts 98.42% <100.00%> (+0.04%) ⬆️

... and 16 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

JoshuaKGoldberg
JoshuaKGoldberg previously approved these changes Sep 3, 2025
Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Just one suggestion for a naming update, nothing in core logic or tests. Happy to just apply this change before our next release. Cheers! ❤️

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg added the 1 approval >=1 team member has approved this PR; we're now leaving it open for more reviews before we merge label Sep 3, 2025
@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg merged commit 5d15bc2 into typescript-eslint:main Sep 8, 2025
62 checks passed
ArnaudBarre added a commit to ArnaudBarre/tsl that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2025
renovate bot added a commit to andrei-picus-tink/auto-renovate that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2025
| datasource | package                          | from   | to     |
| ---------- | -------------------------------- | ------ | ------ |
| npm        | @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin | 8.42.0 | 8.43.0 |
| npm        | @typescript-eslint/parser        | 8.42.0 | 8.43.0 |


## [v8.43.0](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/eslint-plugin/CHANGELOG.md#8430-2025-09-08)

##### 🚀 Features

- **typescript-estree:** disallow empty type parameter/argument lists ([#11563](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11563))

##### 🩹 Fixes

- **eslint-plugin:** \[prefer-return-this-type] don't report an error when returning a union type that includes a classType ([#11432](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11432))
- **eslint-plugin:** \[no-deprecated] should report deprecated exports and reexports ([#11359](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11359))
- **eslint-plugin:** \[no-floating-promises] allowForKnownSafeCalls now supports function names ([#11423](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11423), [#11430](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11430))
- **eslint-plugin:** \[consistent-type-exports] fix declaration shadowing ([#11457](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11457))
- **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-type-conversion] only report \~\~ on integer literal types ([#11517](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11517))
- **scope-manager:** exclude Program from DefinitionBase node types ([#11469](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11469))
- **eslint-plugin:** \[no-non-null-assertion] do not suggest optional chain on LHS of assignment ([#11489](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11489))
- **type-utils:** add union type support to TypeOrValueSpecifier ([#11526](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11526))

##### ❤️ Thank You

- Dima [@dbarabashh](https://github.com/dbarabashh)
- Kirk Waiblinger [@kirkwaiblinger](https://github.com/kirkwaiblinger)
- mdm317
- tao
- Victor Genaev [@mainframev](https://github.com/mainframev)
- Yukihiro Hasegawa [@y-hsgw](https://github.com/y-hsgw)
- 민감자(Minji Kim) [@mouse0429](https://github.com/mouse0429)
- 송재욱

You can read about our [versioning strategy](https://typescript-eslint.io/users/versioning) and [releases](https://typescript-eslint.io/users/releases) on our website.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

1 approval >=1 team member has approved this PR; we're now leaving it open for more reviews before we merge

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: [no-floating-promises] allowForKnownSafeCalls doesn't select named variable function expressions with string matchers

2 participants