Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@y-hsgw
Copy link
Contributor

@y-hsgw y-hsgw commented Aug 16, 2025

PR Checklist

Overview

Avoid suggestions for non-null assertions in assignee positions to prevent invalid auto-fixes.

🐛

@typescript-eslint
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR, @y-hsgw!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Aug 16, 2025

Deploy Preview for typescript-eslint ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 0b0b179
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/typescript-eslint/deploys/68b1620b269f490008a89da3
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-11489--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
1 paths audited
Performance: 97 (no change from production)
Accessibility: 97 (no change from production)
Best Practices: 100 (no change from production)
SEO: 92 (no change from production)
PWA: 80 (no change from production)
View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@nx-cloud
Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Aug 16, 2025

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit 0b0b179

Command Status Duration Result
nx test eslint-plugin --coverage=false ✅ Succeeded 5m 12s View ↗
nx run-many -t lint ✅ Succeeded 3m 16s View ↗
nx run-many -t typecheck ✅ Succeeded 2m 10s View ↗
nx test eslint-plugin-internal --coverage=false ✅ Succeeded 4s View ↗
nx test typescript-estree --coverage=false ✅ Succeeded 2s View ↗
nx run types:build ✅ Succeeded 5s View ↗
nx run integration-tests:test ✅ Succeeded 3s View ↗
nx run generate-configs ✅ Succeeded 7s View ↗
Additional runs (27) ✅ Succeeded ... View ↗

☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2025-08-29 08:27:53 UTC

@kirkwaiblinger kirkwaiblinger changed the title fix(eslint-plugin): [no-non-null-assertion] wrong suggestion on left-hand side of an assignment fix(eslint-plugin): [no-non-null-assertion] do not suggestion optional chain on LHS of assignment Aug 27, 2025
@kirkwaiblinger kirkwaiblinger changed the title fix(eslint-plugin): [no-non-null-assertion] do not suggestion optional chain on LHS of assignment fix(eslint-plugin): [no-non-null-assertion] do not suggest optional chain on LHS of assignment Aug 27, 2025
Copy link
Member

@kirkwaiblinger kirkwaiblinger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The logic change looks correct but requesting a couple finishing touches. Thanks!

],
},
{
code: noFormat`
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These tests don't appear to test anything related to formatting. Could you remove the noFormat please unless there is a specific reason for them?

Suggested change
code: noFormat`
code: `

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry about that.. I fixed it in 3248823!

@kirkwaiblinger kirkwaiblinger added the awaiting response Issues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party label Aug 27, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 28, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.87%. Comparing base (264ca2f) to head (0b0b179).
⚠️ Report is 18 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #11489   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.87%   90.87%           
=======================================
  Files         505      505           
  Lines       51146    51147    +1     
  Branches     8424     8425    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits        46480    46481    +1     
  Misses       4652     4652           
  Partials       14       14           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittest 90.87% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...s/eslint-plugin/src/rules/no-non-null-assertion.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@y-hsgw y-hsgw requested a review from kirkwaiblinger August 28, 2025 09:08
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the awaiting response Issues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party label Aug 28, 2025
Copy link
Member

@kirkwaiblinger kirkwaiblinger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🥳

@kirkwaiblinger kirkwaiblinger added the 1 approval >=1 team member has approved this PR; we're now leaving it open for more reviews before we merge label Aug 29, 2025
Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lovely!

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg merged commit 08e242c into typescript-eslint:main Sep 3, 2025
64 checks passed
@y-hsgw y-hsgw deleted the fix/no-non-null-assertion branch September 3, 2025 11:28
renovate bot added a commit to andrei-picus-tink/auto-renovate that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2025
| datasource | package                          | from   | to     |
| ---------- | -------------------------------- | ------ | ------ |
| npm        | @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin | 8.42.0 | 8.43.0 |
| npm        | @typescript-eslint/parser        | 8.42.0 | 8.43.0 |


## [v8.43.0](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/eslint-plugin/CHANGELOG.md#8430-2025-09-08)

##### 🚀 Features

- **typescript-estree:** disallow empty type parameter/argument lists ([#11563](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11563))

##### 🩹 Fixes

- **eslint-plugin:** \[prefer-return-this-type] don't report an error when returning a union type that includes a classType ([#11432](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11432))
- **eslint-plugin:** \[no-deprecated] should report deprecated exports and reexports ([#11359](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11359))
- **eslint-plugin:** \[no-floating-promises] allowForKnownSafeCalls now supports function names ([#11423](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11423), [#11430](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11430))
- **eslint-plugin:** \[consistent-type-exports] fix declaration shadowing ([#11457](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11457))
- **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-type-conversion] only report \~\~ on integer literal types ([#11517](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11517))
- **scope-manager:** exclude Program from DefinitionBase node types ([#11469](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11469))
- **eslint-plugin:** \[no-non-null-assertion] do not suggest optional chain on LHS of assignment ([#11489](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11489))
- **type-utils:** add union type support to TypeOrValueSpecifier ([#11526](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11526))

##### ❤️ Thank You

- Dima [@dbarabashh](https://github.com/dbarabashh)
- Kirk Waiblinger [@kirkwaiblinger](https://github.com/kirkwaiblinger)
- mdm317
- tao
- Victor Genaev [@mainframev](https://github.com/mainframev)
- Yukihiro Hasegawa [@y-hsgw](https://github.com/y-hsgw)
- 민감자(Minji Kim) [@mouse0429](https://github.com/mouse0429)
- 송재욱

You can read about our [versioning strategy](https://typescript-eslint.io/users/versioning) and [releases](https://typescript-eslint.io/users/releases) on our website.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

1 approval >=1 team member has approved this PR; we're now leaving it open for more reviews before we merge

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: [no-non-null-assertion] wrong suggestion on left-hand side of an assignment

3 participants