Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@ulrichstark
Copy link
Contributor

PR Checklist

Overview

@typescript-eslint
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR, @ulrichstark!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 30, 2025

Deploy Preview for typescript-eslint ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 0e2958d
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/typescript-eslint/deploys/69542e5e2a0c8700087d2484
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-11908--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
1 paths audited
Performance: 92 (🟢 up 2 from production)
Accessibility: 97 (no change from production)
Best Practices: 100 (no change from production)
SEO: 92 (no change from production)
PWA: 80 (no change from production)
View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@nx-cloud
Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Dec 30, 2025

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit 0e2958d

Command Status Duration Result
nx run-many -t lint ✅ Succeeded 3m 8s View ↗
nx run-many -t typecheck ✅ Succeeded 2m 2s View ↗
nx test typescript-estree --coverage=false ✅ Succeeded 2s View ↗
nx test eslint-plugin-internal --coverage=false ✅ Succeeded 3s View ↗
nx run types:build ✅ Succeeded 2s View ↗
nx run integration-tests:test ✅ Succeeded 4s View ↗
nx run generate-configs ✅ Succeeded 6s View ↗
nx run-many --target=build --parallel --exclude... ✅ Succeeded 17s View ↗
Additional runs (28) ✅ Succeeded ... View ↗

☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2025-12-30 20:07:43 UTC

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 30, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.67%. Comparing base (6a05a1a) to head (0e2958d).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #11908   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.67%   90.67%           
=======================================
  Files         525      525           
  Lines       53491    53502   +11     
  Branches     8930     8938    +8     
=======================================
+ Hits        48502    48513   +11     
  Misses       4976     4976           
  Partials       13       13           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittest 90.67% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...-plugin/src/rules/no-useless-default-assignment.ts 99.62% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Just one note that we can always edit in before merge. Thanks! ✨

// https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/issues/11850
`
const { a = 'default' } = Math.random() > 0.5 ? { a: 'Hello' } : {};
`,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[Testing] Just to be safe, could you add in testing for nested ternaries? Checks for specifically conditionals sometimes only work for one level.

const { a = 'default' } = Math.random() > 0.5 ?
  Math.random() > 0.5
    ? { a: 'Hello' }
    : {}
  : {};

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: [no-useless-default-assignment] false positive with ternary

2 participants