Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Replace 'shape' with another term in README and formatting #590

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
aphillips opened this issue Jan 11, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Replace 'shape' with another term in README and formatting #590

aphillips opened this issue Jan 11, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
editorial Issue is non-normative formatting Issue pertains to the formatting section of the spec LDML45 LDML45 Release (Tech Preview) specification Issue affects the specification

Comments

@aphillips
Copy link
Member

Commenting on #574, @macchiati said:

I think the term "shape" is confusing for many readers and may well be misleading: I stumble across a term like "implementation's shape".

It appears that "structure" is what is meant. If so, it should be replaced by that.

If this is merged, I can move this comment to the new issue for cleanup.

@aphillips aphillips added editorial Issue is non-normative specification Issue affects the specification formatting Issue pertains to the formatting section of the spec LDML45 LDML45 Release (Tech Preview) labels Jan 11, 2024
aphillips added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 19, 2024
Addresses #590

Replaces the amorphous term "shape" in Formatting with more appropriate text. Generally I used a reformulation using some variation of the word "form".

In one case, I deleted the paragraph. The paragraph in question was non-normative and basically said the same thing as a normative paragraph just below it--that how formatting works is implementation-defined.
aphillips added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 21, 2024
* Replace 'shape' with better terminology

Addresses #590

Replaces the amorphous term "shape" in Formatting with more appropriate text. Generally I used a reformulation using some variation of the word "form".

In one case, I deleted the paragraph. The paragraph in question was non-normative and basically said the same thing as a normative paragraph just below it--that how formatting works is implementation-defined.

* Fix note formatting and make normative ("important")

The note about eager vs. lazy was intended to be normative. Putting it in a note makes it informative. I changed to "important" and fixed it to format correctly in markdown.
@aphillips
Copy link
Member Author

Fixed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
editorial Issue is non-normative formatting Issue pertains to the formatting section of the spec LDML45 LDML45 Release (Tech Preview) specification Issue affects the specification
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant