Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

JounQin
Copy link
Member

@JounQin JounQin commented Jul 6, 2025

πŸ€– New release

  • unrs_resolver: 1.11.0 -> 1.11.1
Changelog

1.11.1 - 2025-07-09

πŸ“š Documentation

  • add missing descriptionFiles option introduction (by @JounQin)

Contributors


This PR was generated with release-plz.


Important

Bump unrs_resolver version to 1.11.1 with documentation update for descriptionFiles option.

  • Version Bump:
    • Update unrs_resolver version from 1.11.0 to 1.11.1 in Cargo.toml, Cargo.lock, and package.json.
  • Documentation:
    • Add missing descriptionFiles option introduction in CHANGELOG.md.
  • Misc:
    • PR generated using release-plz.

This description was created by Ellipsis for 468a00b. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added a changelog entry for version 1.11.1, documenting the introduction of the descriptionFiles option and crediting the contributor.
  • Chores
    • Updated package version to 1.11.1 across relevant files.

@JounQin JounQin force-pushed the release-plz-2025-07-06T13-57-04Z branch from 7814802 to 0a7bc16 Compare July 6, 2025 13:57
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 6, 2025

Walkthrough

This change updates the project version to 1.11.1 across Cargo.toml, package.json, and the changelog. The changelog documents a documentation update that introduces the missing descriptionFiles option, with credit given to a contributor. No code or public API changes are included.

Changes

Files Change Summary
CHANGELOG.md Added entry for version 1.11.1 documenting a documentation update.
Cargo.toml Updated package version from 1.11.0 to 1.11.1 in two locations.
package.json Bumped version to 1.11.1 and updated postinstall script accordingly.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

release

Poem

A hop and a skip, a version anew,
1.11.1 shines with a changelog in view.
No code has been changed, just docs made right,
Now descriptionFiles is clear and in sight.
Thank you, dear friend, for making it clearβ€”
πŸ‡ Another release, let’s all give a cheer!


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❀️ Share
πŸͺ§ Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Important

Looks good to me! πŸ‘

Reviewed everything up to 7814802 in 39 seconds. Click for details.
  • Reviewed 52 lines of code in 3 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 3 draft comments. View those below.
  • Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with πŸ‘ or πŸ‘Ž to teach Ellipsis.
1. Cargo.toml:18
  • Draft comment:
    Workspace dependency version bumped to 1.11.1; update appears consistent.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None
2. Cargo.toml:21
  • Draft comment:
    The [package] section version is updated to 1.11.1 and is consistent with the workspace settings.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None
3. Cargo.lock:1115
  • Draft comment:
    Cargo.lock correctly reflects the update of unrs_resolver to version 1.11.1.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None

Workflow ID: wflow_w70rapjt0PCCFsc1

You can customize Ellipsis by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with πŸ‘ or πŸ‘Ž, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 6, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests βœ…

Project coverage is 95.10%. Comparing base (450dab4) to head (468a00b).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #181   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.10%   95.10%           
=======================================
  Files          12       12           
  Lines        2818     2818           
=======================================
  Hits         2680     2680           
  Misses        138      138           

β˜” View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
πŸ“’ Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

πŸš€ New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • πŸ“¦ JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)

14-18: Unify list-marker style to silence markdownlint (MD004).

Line 14 uses - while line 18 switches to *. Stick to one marker (the project mostly uses dashes) to avoid linter noise.

-* @JounQin
+- @JounQin
πŸ“œ Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

πŸ“₯ Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f10dee5 and 0a7bc16.

β›” Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (3)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
  • package.json (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (4)
πŸ““ Common learnings
Learnt from: JounQin
PR: unrs/unrs-resolver#72
File: fixtures/tsconfig/cases/dot-alias/tsconfigs/tsconfig.base.json:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-21T06:11:46.964Z
Learning: JounQin's fix for the dot alias issue in PR #72 addresses the problem by correctly normalizing paths in the `extend_tsconfig` method, ensuring that base URLs are properly resolved as absolute paths when extending tsconfigs, rather than adding special case handling for dot aliases in the resolver.
CHANGELOG.md (1)
Learnt from: JounQin
PR: unrs/unrs-resolver#75
File: src/tests/pnp.rs:116-133
Timestamp: 2025-04-21T08:17:34.175Z
Learning: Test cases in unrs-resolver that intentionally document failing behavior should make the intent clear by either: 1) asserting on the expected error condition rather than the desired behavior, 2) using #[should_panic] for tests expected to panic, or 3) using #[ignore] with a reason to skip known failing tests in CI.
Cargo.toml (5)
Learnt from: JounQin
PR: unrs/unrs-resolver#136
File: src/tests/extension_alias.rs:36-46
Timestamp: 2025-06-05T18:52:30.363Z
Learning: The fixtures/yarn directory in the unrs-resolver project requires running `yarn install` to install TypeScript dependencies before tests can run, similar to other fixture directories like fixtures/pnp. The test in src/tests/extension_alias.rs depends on the installed TypeScript package providing lib/typescript.d.ts and related files.
Learnt from: JounQin
PR: unrs/unrs-resolver#136
File: src/tests/extension_alias.rs:36-46
Timestamp: 2025-06-05T18:52:30.363Z
Learning: The fixtures/yarn directory in the unrs-resolver project requires running `yarn install` to install TypeScript dependencies before tests can run, similar to other fixture directories like fixtures/pnp. The test in src/tests/extension_alias.rs depends on the installed TypeScript package providing lib/typescript.d.ts and related files.
Learnt from: JounQin
PR: unrs/unrs-resolver#40
File: src/tests/resolve.rs:121-136
Timestamp: 2025-03-29T04:14:03.715Z
Learning: For tests involving npm/yarn package resolution in the unrs-resolver project, dependencies must be installed first using the appropriate package manager commands (pnpm i, yarn) in both the root directory and fixture directories like fixtures/pnp and fixtures/misc/nested-package-json.
Learnt from: JounQin
PR: unrs/unrs-resolver#75
File: src/tests/pnp.rs:116-133
Timestamp: 2025-04-21T09:52:45.840Z
Learning: In Yarn PnP environments, some packages use nested package.json files for subpaths instead of the exports field. The resolver should check for these nested package.json files when resolving subpaths like `@atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-drop/combine` to correctly handle packages with this structure.
Learnt from: JounQin
PR: unrs/unrs-resolver#115
File: tests/resolve_test.rs:251-263
Timestamp: 2025-05-28T02:21:41.547Z
Learning: In pnpm workspaces, `pnpm install` must be run first to initialize dependencies and create the proper node_modules/.pnpm structure before tests can pass. Tests that rely on resolving packages will fail if dependencies haven't been installed yet.
package.json (7)
Learnt from: JounQin
PR: unrs/unrs-resolver#40
File: src/tests/resolve.rs:121-136
Timestamp: 2025-03-29T04:14:03.715Z
Learning: For tests involving npm/yarn package resolution in the unrs-resolver project, dependencies must be installed first using the appropriate package manager commands (pnpm i, yarn) in both the root directory and fixture directories like fixtures/pnp and fixtures/misc/nested-package-json.
Learnt from: JounQin
PR: unrs/unrs-resolver#136
File: src/tests/extension_alias.rs:36-46
Timestamp: 2025-06-05T18:52:30.363Z
Learning: The fixtures/yarn directory in the unrs-resolver project requires running `yarn install` to install TypeScript dependencies before tests can run, similar to other fixture directories like fixtures/pnp. The test in src/tests/extension_alias.rs depends on the installed TypeScript package providing lib/typescript.d.ts and related files.
Learnt from: JounQin
PR: unrs/unrs-resolver#75
File: src/tests/pnp.rs:116-133
Timestamp: 2025-04-21T09:52:45.840Z
Learning: In Yarn PnP environments, some packages use nested package.json files for subpaths instead of the exports field. The resolver should check for these nested package.json files when resolving subpaths like `@atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-drop/combine` to correctly handle packages with this structure.
Learnt from: JounQin
PR: unrs/unrs-resolver#136
File: src/tests/extension_alias.rs:36-46
Timestamp: 2025-06-05T18:52:30.363Z
Learning: The fixtures/yarn directory in the unrs-resolver project requires running `yarn install` to install TypeScript dependencies before tests can run, similar to other fixture directories like fixtures/pnp. The test in src/tests/extension_alias.rs depends on the installed TypeScript package providing lib/typescript.d.ts and related files.
Learnt from: JounQin
PR: unrs/unrs-resolver#75
File: fixtures/pnp/package.json:11-14
Timestamp: 2025-04-21T08:11:41.469Z
Learning: The project uses a justfile with an `install` task that includes running yarn in the fixtures/pnp directory to install dependencies with the command: `cd fixtures/pnp && yarn`.
Learnt from: JounQin
PR: unrs/unrs-resolver#144
File: napi/patch.mjs:5-5
Timestamp: 2025-06-10T13:53:02.983Z
Learning: Build-time scripts in napi/patch.mjs and similar build pipeline contexts don't require error handling for reading expected files like index.js, as these files are guaranteed to be present during the build process.
Learnt from: JounQin
PR: unrs/unrs-resolver#115
File: tests/resolve_test.rs:251-263
Timestamp: 2025-05-28T02:21:41.547Z
Learning: In pnpm workspaces, `pnpm install` must be run first to initialize dependencies and create the proper node_modules/.pnpm structure before tests can pass. Tests that rely on resolving packages will fail if dependencies haven't been installed yet.
πŸͺ› markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
CHANGELOG.md

18-18: Unordered list style
Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk

(MD004, ul-style)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: Upload coverage file
  • GitHub Check: Benchmark
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
πŸ”‡ Additional comments (2)
Cargo.toml (1)

18-20: Version bump looks consistent across workspace & crate.

1.11.1 is set both under [workspace.dependencies] and [package]; nothing else required here.

Also applies to: 22-24

package.json (1)

3-3: Versions synchronized between Cargo.toml and package.json
βœ… Verified: both set to 1.11.1

Consider adding a CI check to enforce this going forward:

#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail

cargo_version=$(grep -m1 -E '^version *= *"' Cargo.toml | sed -E 's/.*"([^"]+)".*/\1/')
pkg_version=$(jq -r .version package.json)

if [[ "$cargo_version" != "$pkg_version" ]]; then
  echo "❌  Version mismatch: Cargo.toml=$cargo_version, package.json=$pkg_version"
  exit 1
fi
echo "βœ…  Versions match: $cargo_version"
  • package.json: line 3
  • Cargo.toml: version field

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jul 6, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #181 will not alter performance

Comparing release-plz-2025-07-06T13-57-04Z (468a00b) with main (450dab4)

Summary

βœ… 3 untouched benchmarks

@JounQin JounQin force-pushed the release-plz-2025-07-06T13-57-04Z branch 2 times, most recently from 8f98633 to 5e6cf30 Compare July 9, 2025 14:41
Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Important

Looks good to me! πŸ‘

Reviewed 5e6cf30 in 40 seconds. Click for details.
  • Reviewed 73 lines of code in 4 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 2 draft comments. View those below.
  • Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with πŸ‘ or πŸ‘Ž to teach Ellipsis.
1. Cargo.toml:23
  • Draft comment:
    Version updated to 1.11.1. Ensure workspace dependency and package version are in sync.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None
2. package.json:3
  • Draft comment:
    Version bumped to 1.11.1 and postinstall script updated accordingly.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None

Workflow ID: wflow_DmGzyMpnrIuA9gnE

You can customize Ellipsis by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with πŸ‘ or πŸ‘Ž, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
CHANGELOG.md (2)

10-12: Insert a blank line after the version heading

markdownlint flags the missing newline between the ## 1.11.1 heading and the subsequent ### Documentation sub-heading. Adding an empty line keeps the document structure consistent with earlier sections and silences the linter.

-## [1.11.1](https://github.com/unrs/unrs-resolver/compare/v1.11.0...v1.11.1) - 2025-07-09
-### <!-- 3 -->πŸ“š Documentation
+## [1.11.1](https://github.com/unrs/unrs-resolver/compare/v1.11.0...v1.11.1) - 2025-07-09
+
+### <!-- 3 -->πŸ“š Documentation

16-18: Unify bullet style in β€œContributors” lists

Previous Contributors sections use the * bullet while feature/refactor lists use -.
markdownlint (MD004) recommends choosing one style per document. Either:

  1. Change this line to - @JounQin, or
  2. Convert earlier contributors bullets to -.

Pick whichever convention you prefer and apply consistently.

πŸ“œ Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

πŸ“₯ Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0a7bc16 and 5e6cf30.

β›” Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (3)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
  • package.json (2 hunks)
βœ… Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • Cargo.toml
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
πŸ““ Common learnings
Learnt from: JounQin
PR: unrs/unrs-resolver#72
File: fixtures/tsconfig/cases/dot-alias/tsconfigs/tsconfig.base.json:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-21T06:11:46.964Z
Learning: JounQin's fix for the dot alias issue in PR #72 addresses the problem by correctly normalizing paths in the `extend_tsconfig` method, ensuring that base URLs are properly resolved as absolute paths when extending tsconfigs, rather than adding special case handling for dot aliases in the resolver.
CHANGELOG.md (1)
Learnt from: JounQin
PR: unrs/unrs-resolver#75
File: src/tests/pnp.rs:116-133
Timestamp: 2025-04-21T08:17:34.175Z
Learning: Test cases in unrs-resolver that intentionally document failing behavior should make the intent clear by either: 1) asserting on the expected error condition rather than the desired behavior, 2) using #[should_panic] for tests expected to panic, or 3) using #[ignore] with a reason to skip known failing tests in CI.
πŸͺ› LanguageTool
CHANGELOG.md

[grammar] ~10-~10: Use correct spacing
Context: ...s-resolver/compare/v1.11.0...v1.11.1) - 2025-07-09 ### πŸ“š Documentation - add missing `descri...

(QB_NEW_EN_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_5)


[grammar] ~12-~12: Use correct spacing
Context: ...v1.11.1) - 2025-07-09 ### πŸ“š Documentation - add missing descriptionFiles option i...

(QB_NEW_EN_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_5)


[grammar] ~14-~14: There might be a problem here.
Context: ...scriptionFiles` option introduction (by @JounQin) ### Contributors * @JounQin ## [1.11.0](https://github.com/unrs/unrs-re...

(QB_NEW_EN_MERGED_MATCH)

πŸͺ› markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
CHANGELOG.md

18-18: Unordered list style
Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk

(MD004, ul-style)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (5)
  • GitHub Check: Lint
  • GitHub Check: Test (ubuntu-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Test (macos-14)
  • GitHub Check: Benchmark
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis

@JounQin JounQin force-pushed the release-plz-2025-07-06T13-57-04Z branch from 5e6cf30 to c35c134 Compare July 9, 2025 14:44
@JounQin JounQin force-pushed the release-plz-2025-07-06T13-57-04Z branch from c35c134 to 468a00b Compare July 9, 2025 14:44
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jul 9, 2025

Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Important

Looks good to me! πŸ‘

Reviewed 468a00b in 56 seconds. Click for details.
  • Reviewed 73 lines of code in 4 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 2 draft comments. View those below.
  • Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with πŸ‘ or πŸ‘Ž to teach Ellipsis.
1. Cargo.toml:22
  • Draft comment:
    Version bump to 1.11.1 is applied consistently in both workspace deps and package section.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% This comment is purely informative and does not provide any actionable feedback or suggestions. It simply states that a version bump is applied consistently, which does not require any action from the PR author.
2. package.json:3
  • Draft comment:
    Package version and postinstall script updated to 1.11.1 correctly.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% This comment is purely informative, stating that a package version and postinstall script were updated correctly. It does not provide any actionable feedback or suggestions for improvement.

Workflow ID: wflow_GKvX3WHBTQc0LvGO

You can customize Ellipsis by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with πŸ‘ or πŸ‘Ž, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)

14-14: Polish the bullet wording for clarity & consistency

Minor language tweak keeps the tone consistent with previous entries and reads a bit smoother.

- - add missing `descriptionFiles` option introduction (by @JounQin)
+ - Add missing introduction for the `descriptionFiles` option (by @JounQin)
πŸ“œ Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

πŸ“₯ Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5e6cf30 and 468a00b.

β›” Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (3)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
  • package.json (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • Cargo.toml
  • package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
πŸ““ Common learnings
Learnt from: JounQin
PR: unrs/unrs-resolver#72
File: fixtures/tsconfig/cases/dot-alias/tsconfigs/tsconfig.base.json:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-21T06:11:46.964Z
Learning: JounQin's fix for the dot alias issue in PR #72 addresses the problem by correctly normalizing paths in the `extend_tsconfig` method, ensuring that base URLs are properly resolved as absolute paths when extending tsconfigs, rather than adding special case handling for dot aliases in the resolver.
CHANGELOG.md (1)
Learnt from: JounQin
PR: unrs/unrs-resolver#75
File: src/tests/pnp.rs:116-133
Timestamp: 2025-04-21T08:17:34.175Z
Learning: Test cases in unrs-resolver that intentionally document failing behavior should make the intent clear by either: 1) asserting on the expected error condition rather than the desired behavior, 2) using #[should_panic] for tests expected to panic, or 3) using #[ignore] with a reason to skip known failing tests in CI.
πŸͺ› LanguageTool
CHANGELOG.md

[grammar] ~10-~10: Use correct spacing
Context: ...s-resolver/compare/v1.11.0...v1.11.1) - 2025-07-09 ### πŸ“š Documentation - add missing `descri...

(QB_NEW_EN_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_5)


[grammar] ~12-~12: Use correct spacing
Context: ...v1.11.1) - 2025-07-09 ### πŸ“š Documentation - add missing descriptionFiles option i...

(QB_NEW_EN_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_5)


[grammar] ~14-~14: There might be a problem here.
Context: ...scriptionFiles` option introduction (by @JounQin) ### Contributors * @JounQin ## [1.11.0](https://github.com/unrs/unrs-re...

(QB_NEW_EN_MERGED_MATCH)

πŸͺ› markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
CHANGELOG.md

18-18: Unordered list style
Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk

(MD004, ul-style)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: Benchmark
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
πŸ”‡ Additional comments (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)

10-18: Changelog addition looks correct otherwise

Version, link target, date, and contributor section all match the release bump. No structural issues detected.

@JounQin JounQin merged commit 9480a90 into main Jul 9, 2025
23 checks passed
@JounQin JounQin deleted the release-plz-2025-07-06T13-57-04Z branch July 9, 2025 14:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant