docs(SSO): explain SSO filters with RE2 tester - #6297
Conversation
Greptile SummaryThe PR improves guidance for configuring SSO identifier filters.
Confidence Score: 5/5The PR appears safe to merge with no actionable correctness or security issues identified. The UI type widening is compatible with existing rendering, localization falls back to English, and the documented expressions and linked tester align with the backend’s Go regular-expression implementation.
|
| Filename | Overview |
|---|---|
| web/src/components/CreateIdentityProviderDialog.tsx | Safely broadens description content to ReactNode and adds a valid external tester link without changing SSO enforcement. |
| web/src/locales/en.json | Adds valid anchored RE2 examples and the English label for the tester link. |
Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "docs(web): explain SSO filters with RE2 ..." | Re-trigger Greptile
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Team Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 10 included reviews per hour; 7 remain after this review. WalkthroughThe identifier filter field now accepts a Suggested reviewers: Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to This change improves SSO identifier-filter guidance with RE2 examples and a safe external testing link. No current merge-blocking risk is identified. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Full details: Docstring CoverageExplanation Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 2 functions across 1 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Re: #6292
RegExp is a pain to debug - especially since there are so many variants. This gives clear common examples and a link to a tester that supports the same RegExp variant as is expected.
^(alice|bob|chuck)$and^[^@]+@example\\.com$