Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Gather coverage on code calling DBMS_STATS. #1184

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 8, 2022

Conversation

jgebal
Copy link
Member

@jgebal jgebal commented Feb 6, 2022

Implemented a workaround that allows for running utPLSQL tests with code coverage on source with calls to DBMS_STATS.
Resolves: #1097
Resolves: #1094

Implemented a workaround that allows for running utPLSQL tests with code coverage on source with calls to DBMS_STATS.
Resolves: #1097
Resolves: #1094
@jgebal jgebal added this to the 3.1.12 milestone Feb 6, 2022
@jgebal jgebal requested a review from lwasylow February 6, 2022 22:49
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2022

Unit Test Results

       1 files         2 suites   1m 44s ⏱️
1 023 tests 1 019 ✔️ 4 💤 0
1 026 runs  1 018 ✔️ 8 💤 0

Results for commit 9912dfa.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 6, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #1184 (9912dfa) into develop (ab1acfa) will decrease coverage by 0.11%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1184      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    94.86%   94.75%   -0.12%     
===========================================
  Files          104      104              
  Lines         4853     4859       +6     
  Branches        21       21              
===========================================
  Hits          4604     4604              
- Misses         241      247       +6     
  Partials         8        8              
Flag Coverage Δ
11xe 94.13% <ø> (-0.05%) ⬇️
18xe 94.41% <0.00%> (-0.12%) ⬇️
21xe 94.57% <0.00%> (-0.12%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
source/core/coverage/ut_coverage_helper_block.pkb 55.00% <0.00%> (-23.58%) ⬇️
source/core/ut_utils.pkb 94.19% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 08bb27b...9912dfa. Read the comment docs.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Feb 7, 2022

SonarCloud Quality Gate failed.    Quality Gate failed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

0.0% 0.0% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@jgebal jgebal merged commit 751d983 into develop Feb 8, 2022
@jgebal jgebal deleted the feature/ignore_coverage_failure_1097 branch February 8, 2022 08:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ORA-08402: error executing PL/SQL code coverage Error on call of coverage stop in java
2 participants