Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Preparation for the annotation configuration approach and suite setup/teardown#34

Merged
rlove merged 2 commits intoutPLSQL:version3from
Pazus:object-types-design
Aug 17, 2016
Merged

Preparation for the annotation configuration approach and suite setup/teardown#34
rlove merged 2 commits intoutPLSQL:version3from
Pazus:object-types-design

Conversation

@Pazus
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@Pazus Pazus commented Aug 16, 2016

Fixed custom reporter in the example after naming convention fixes
Moved Add item to the ut_composite_object type
Added object_name attribute to the ut_test_object type to save the procedure/package name for test/suite, for the suites primary to construct "suitepath" in the annotation approach
Added search procedure to find an index of the item with defined object_name in the array of ut_composite_object
Added separate setup and teardown procedures to the suite which run at the beginning of the whole suite and at the end. Currently invalidation of the all nested object is not developed

All the examples and tests do pass.

Moved Add item to the ut_composite_object type
Added object_name attribute to the ut_test_object type to save the procedure/package name for test/suite, for the suites primary to construct "suitepath" in the annotation approach
Added search procedure to find an index of the item with defined object_name in the array of ut_composite_object
Added separate setup and teardown procedures to the suite which run at the beginning of the whole suite and at the end. Currently invalidation of the all nested object is not developed

All the examples and tests do pass.
… will be easier to add new in the future without invalidating all it's subtypes that doesn't have required implementations of the new methods
@Pazus
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Pazus commented Aug 17, 2016

Made the default empty implementation for ut_suite_reporter methods so it will be easier to add new in the future without invalidating all it's subtypes that doesn't have required implementations of the new methods

@rlove rlove merged commit eefde4a into utPLSQL:version3 Aug 17, 2016
@rlove rlove removed the in progress label Aug 17, 2016
@Pazus Pazus deleted the object-types-design branch January 30, 2017 18:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants