Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

bench: tsort_input_parsing_heavy reduce the input side. #9067

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 29, 2025
Merged

bench: tsort_input_parsing_heavy reduce the input side. #9067

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 29, 2025

Conversation

@sylvestre
Copy link
Contributor

@sylvestre sylvestre commented Oct 28, 2025

it takes 12+ sec for now

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Oct 28, 2025 •
edited
Loading

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #9067 will degrade performances by 2.65%

Comparing sylvestre-patch-2 (d1be7b6) with main (5c5494a)

Summary

❌ 3 regressions
✅ 101 untouched
🆕 1 new

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Benchmarks breakdown

Benchmark BASE HEAD Change
❌ du_balanced_tree[(5, 4, 10)] 9.1 ms 9.3 ms -2.65%
❌ du_human_balanced_tree[(5, 4, 10)] 10.2 ms 10.5 ms -2.46%
❌ du_summarize_balanced_tree[(5, 4, 10)] 8.4 ms 8.5 ms -2.06%
🆕 tsort_input_parsing_heavy[5000] N/A 122.4 ms N/A

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 28, 2025

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skipping an intermittent issue tests/tail/overlay-headers (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)

@RenjiSann
Copy link
Collaborator

RenjiSann commented Oct 28, 2025

75 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

Note that you should archive tsort_wide_dag[50000] benchmark

@cakebaker cakebaker merged commit 99b8475 into main Oct 29, 2025
237 of 238 checks passed
@cakebaker cakebaker deleted the sylvestre-patch-2 branch October 29, 2025 15:04
@BrewTestBot BrewTestBot mentioned this pull request Nov 10, 2025
Merged
@moonfruit moonfruit mentioned this pull request Nov 10, 2025
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@sylvestre @RenjiSann @cakebaker