Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

docs: add data ingestion & file processing recipe#1112

Closed
johnlindquist wants to merge 9 commits intomainfrom
docs/data-ingestion
Closed

docs: add data ingestion & file processing recipe#1112
johnlindquist wants to merge 9 commits intomainfrom
docs/data-ingestion

Conversation

@johnlindquist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

  • Adds new Recipes section to the documentation navigation
  • Creates data ingestion & file processing guide covering:
    • File upload processing (with streaming variant for large files)
    • Event ingestion pipelines using createWebhook()
    • Email processing with classification and routing
    • Resilient data extraction with exponential backoff (RetryableError, FatalError, getStepMetadata)
    • Batch processing with controlled concurrency
  • Motivated by usage data: 23 teams, 1.1M runs - processFileWorkflow alone has 440K runs

Test plan

  • Link validation passes (bun run lint:links - 0 errors)
  • TypeScript code sample validation passes (all 6 code blocks type-check)
  • Verify MDX renders correctly in dev server
  • Verify meta.json navigation works

swarm:codex-next-readme and others added 8 commits February 18, 2026 09:48
Replaces the placeholder @workflow/next README with a complete package-level reference.
The new content documents installation, withWorkflow() API usage/signature,
configuration examples, internal behavior, env vars, exports, generated files,
runtime routing, public manifest exposure, and troubleshooting.

Verified: rg -n "^## Install|^### Type signature|^### Example: object config|^### Example: async config function|^## What .* does|^## Serving the manifest publicly|^## Troubleshooting" packages/next/README.md
Verified: rg -n "WORKFLOW_TARGET_WORLD|WORKFLOW_LOCAL_DATA_DIR|PORT|WORKFLOW_NEXT_PRIVATE_BUILT|WORKFLOW_PUBLIC_MANIFEST|WATCHPACK_WATCHER_LIMIT" packages/next/README.md
Verified: rg -n "@workflow/next|@workflow/next/loader|@workflow/next/runtime|\.well-known/workflow/v1/flow/route\.js|\.well-known/workflow/v1/step/route\.js|\.well-known/workflow/v1/webhook/\[token\]/route\.js" packages/next/README.md

How to test: open packages/next/README.md and confirm all required sections and tables render correctly.
Update spec.md to resolve the static/instance method contradiction, document forbidden step-expression validation errors, and add import compatibility guidance for serialization-file discovery.

Verified: git diff --check -- packages/swc-plugin-workflow/spec.md
Verified: npx --yes [email protected] packages/swc-plugin-workflow/spec.md --disable MD013 (fails with pre-existing file-wide markdown style issues unrelated to this change)
Add the requested blog markdown file at .blog/durable-execution-layer.md\nwith exact content and preserved formatting/code blocks.\n\nVerified: diff -u <(cat <<'EOF' ... ) .blog/durable-execution-layer.md (no diff; exact match)\nVerified: pnpm exec biome check .blog/durable-execution-layer.md (file is ignored by repo biome config)
Add the requested blog draft as an exact markdown copy for agent reliability content.

Verified: cat <<'EOF' | cmp -s - .blog/stateless-retries-multiply-agent-side-effects.md && echo "Exact content match verified"
Verified: git status --short -- .blog/stateless-retries-multiply-agent-side-effects.md
Overwrite .blog/durable-execution-layer.md with the exact requested markdown content, including code blocks and section structure.

Verified: git diff --check -- .blog/durable-execution-layer.md

Verified: git diff -- .blog/durable-execution-layer.md
Overwrite the blog markdown with the exact provided copy for Workflow DevKit deterministic replay behavior and code patterns.

Verified: diff -u .blog/how-deterministic-replay-works-for-ai-agents.md <(cat <<'EOF' ... EOF) (no differences)

Verified: pnpm exec biome check .blog/how-deterministic-replay-works-for-ai-agents.md (path ignored by biome config; no file-level lint available)
Overwrite the target blog file with the exact markdown content provided for this task.\n\nThis preserves all headings, prose, and fenced code examples verbatim.\n\nVerified: cat <<'EOF' | diff -u - .blog/stateless-retries-multiply-agent-side-effects.md (no diff; exit 0)\nVerified: repository Biome config does not include Markdown files (.md), so no project-scoped markdown linter applies
@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Feb 18, 2026

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: a6427cc

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@vercel
Copy link
Contributor

vercel bot commented Feb 18, 2026

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 18, 2026

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 0.025s (-24.3% 🟢) 1.005s (~) 0.979s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Express 0.031s (-4.0%) 1.005s (~) 0.974s 10 1.22x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.183s (-61.5% 🟢) 1.010s (~) 0.826s 10 7.20x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.490s (+373.5% 🔺) 1.010s (~) 0.520s 10 19.20x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 2.086s (+95.8% 🔺) 3.549s (+43.0% 🔺) 1.463s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 2.974s (+331.3% 🔺) 4.487s (+116.0% 🔺) 1.512s 10 1.43x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 3.215s (+295.7% 🔺) 4.717s (+128.1% 🔺) 1.502s 10 1.54x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 1.073s (-2.9%) 2.005s (~) 0.932s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Express 1.106s (~) 2.005s (~) 0.898s 10 1.03x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 2.243s (-4.4%) 3.014s (~) 0.771s 10 2.09x
🐘 Postgres Express 2.343s (-5.4% 🟢) 3.015s (~) 0.672s 10 2.18x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 4.993s (+122.2% 🔺) 6.244s (+101.1% 🔺) 1.251s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 5.096s (+122.4% 🔺) 6.414s (+104.3% 🔺) 1.318s 10 1.02x
▲ Vercel Express 5.225s (+139.4% 🔺) 6.662s (+111.3% 🔺) 1.437s 10 1.05x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro | Express

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 10.548s (-2.6%) 11.022s (~) 0.474s 3 1.00x
💻 Local Express 10.817s (~) 11.022s (~) 0.204s 3 1.03x
🐘 Postgres Express 18.929s (-7.0% 🟢) 19.556s (-7.1% 🟢) 0.627s 2 1.79x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 20.405s (+1.0%) 21.059s (~) 0.654s 2 1.93x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 18.784s (+6.3% 🔺) 20.193s (+7.5% 🔺) 1.409s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 20.561s (+3.2%) 21.511s (+3.0%) 0.951s 2 1.09x
▲ Vercel Nitro 20.991s (+19.2% 🔺) 22.431s (+16.5% 🔺) 1.440s 2 1.12x

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 26.782s (-2.5%) 27.049s (-3.6%) 0.267s 3 1.00x
💻 Local Express 27.460s (~) 28.048s (~) 0.589s 3 1.03x
🐘 Postgres Express 46.215s (-7.9% 🟢) 46.623s (-7.9% 🟢) 0.409s 2 1.73x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 50.172s (-0.6%) 50.633s (-1.0%) 0.461s 2 1.87x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 43.797s (+1.2%) 44.971s (+1.5%) 1.173s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 44.228s (+2.3%) 45.338s (+1.2%) 1.110s 2 1.01x
▲ Vercel Express 45.072s (+5.1% 🔺) 46.452s (+5.4% 🔺) 1.381s 2 1.03x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 55.693s (-2.7%) 56.097s (-3.4%) 0.404s 2 1.00x
💻 Local Express 57.261s (~) 58.099s (~) 0.837s 2 1.03x
🐘 Postgres Express 76.299s (-24.0% 🟢) 76.678s (-24.3% 🟢) 0.379s 2 1.37x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 100.339s (~) 101.244s (+1.0%) 0.905s 1 1.80x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 180.109s (+107.9% 🔺) 181.414s (+106.5% 🔺) 1.305s 1 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 183.661s (+108.5% 🔺) 184.640s (+106.6% 🔺) 0.979s 1 1.02x
▲ Vercel Express 189.840s (+114.9% 🔺) 191.456s (+114.9% 🔺) 1.616s 1 1.05x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 1.362s (-5.1% 🟢) 2.005s (~) 0.642s 15 1.00x
💻 Local Express 1.401s (~) 2.006s (~) 0.605s 15 1.03x
🐘 Postgres Express 2.160s (-10.3% 🟢) 3.014s (~) 0.854s 10 1.59x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 2.362s (+10.6% 🔺) 3.014s (~) 0.652s 10 1.73x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 5.055s (+118.9% 🔺) 6.285s (+90.7% 🔺) 1.230s 7 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 5.574s (+63.3% 🔺) 6.440s (+49.4% 🔺) 0.865s 7 1.10x
▲ Vercel Express 7.100s (+192.5% 🔺) 8.892s (+163.6% 🔺) 1.792s 4 1.40x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 2.263s (-13.1% 🟢) 3.007s (~) 0.744s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Express 2.609s (+2.2%) 3.008s (~) 0.399s 10 1.15x
🐘 Postgres Express 8.261s (+2.4%) 9.028s (+9.1% 🔺) 0.766s 4 3.65x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 8.527s (+0.5%) 9.034s (~) 0.506s 4 3.77x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 22.938s (+763.2% 🔺) 23.857s (+589.9% 🔺) 0.920s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 30.481s (+855.9% 🔺) 31.158s (+695.8% 🔺) 0.677s 1 1.33x
▲ Vercel Express 43.061s (+1285.8% 🔺) 43.877s (+937.3% 🔺) 0.816s 1 1.88x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 6.076s (-17.3% 🟢) 6.813s (-15.0% 🟢) 0.737s 5 1.00x
💻 Local Express 7.564s (+3.9%) 8.019s (~) 0.454s 4 1.24x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 43.492s (-10.0% 🟢) 44.111s (-10.2% 🟢) 0.619s 1 7.16x
🐘 Postgres Express 46.751s (+12.3% 🔺) 47.124s (+11.9% 🔺) 0.373s 1 7.69x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 29.695s (+788.7% 🔺) 30.767s (+615.5% 🔺) 1.072s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 35.676s (+669.1% 🔺) 36.493s (+549.3% 🔺) 0.817s 2 1.20x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 36.934s (+627.2% 🔺) 38.121s (+524.9% 🔺) 1.187s 2 1.24x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 1.356s (-5.2% 🟢) 2.005s (~) 0.649s 15 1.00x
💻 Local Express 1.417s (~) 2.005s (~) 0.588s 15 1.05x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 2.034s (-10.5% 🟢) 2.741s (+2.1%) 0.708s 11 1.50x
🐘 Postgres Express 2.226s (+13.3% 🔺) 2.833s (+12.7% 🔺) 0.608s 11 1.64x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 6.350s (+138.7% 🔺) 7.617s (+109.4% 🔺) 1.267s 5 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 7.734s (+249.8% 🔺) 9.258s (+183.0% 🔺) 1.524s 5 1.22x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 7.766s (+245.4% 🔺) 9.155s (+184.7% 🔺) 1.389s 4 1.22x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 2.391s (-10.8% 🟢) 3.008s (~) 0.617s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Express 2.759s (+2.8%) 3.009s (~) 0.250s 10 1.15x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 8.469s (-36.4% 🟢) 9.035s (-34.1% 🟢) 0.566s 4 3.54x
🐘 Postgres Express 11.443s (~) 12.039s (~) 0.595s 3 4.79x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 18.337s (+593.1% 🔺) 19.316s (+443.0% 🔺) 0.978s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 44.624s (+1679.1% 🔺) 45.620s (+1226.3% 🔺) 0.996s 1 2.43x
▲ Vercel Nitro 45.989s (+1894.6% 🔺) 47.263s (+1385.8% 🔺) 1.274s 1 2.51x

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 6.683s (-15.1% 🟢) 7.012s (-15.2% 🟢) 0.328s 5 1.00x
💻 Local Express 8.219s (+1.8%) 9.023s (+9.1% 🔺) 0.804s 4 1.23x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 46.008s (-11.4% 🟢) 46.120s (-11.5% 🟢) 0.112s 1 6.88x
🐘 Postgres Express 50.433s (-2.1%) 51.119s (-1.9%) 0.686s 1 7.55x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 12.458s (+223.0% 🔺) 14.064s (+202.5% 🔺) 1.606s 3 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 32.693s (+747.4% 🔺) 39.225s (+679.7% 🔺) 6.532s 1 2.62x
▲ Vercel Nitro 34.066s (+999.9% 🔺) 34.813s (+773.6% 🔺) 0.747s 1 2.73x

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro

Stream Benchmarks (includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 0.111s (-36.8% 🟢) 1.002s (~) 0.010s (-12.6% 🟢) 1.014s (~) 0.904s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Express 0.170s (+0.8%) 1.002s (~) 0.011s (-6.1% 🟢) 1.016s (~) 0.846s 10 1.54x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.105s (-55.0% 🟢) 1.934s (-25.2% 🟢) 0.001s (-15.4% 🟢) 2.013s (-33.2% 🟢) 0.908s 10 9.99x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 2.443s (+9.7% 🔺) 2.603s (-7.6% 🟢) 0.002s (-5.9% 🟢) 3.015s (~) 0.572s 10 22.07x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 6.672s (+239.3% 🔺) 5.658s (+114.7% 🔺) 0.243s (-59.9% 🟢) 8.179s (+115.4% 🔺) 1.507s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 6.971s (+180.2% 🔺) 7.405s (+141.4% 🔺) 0.182s (-21.4% 🟢) 8.568s (+122.1% 🔺) 1.597s 10 1.04x
▲ Vercel Nitro 8.069s (+316.5% 🔺) 7.808s (+190.4% 🔺) 0.237s (-59.6% 🟢) 9.868s (+158.3% 🔺) 1.799s 10 1.21x

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World 🥇 Fastest Framework Wins
💻 Local Nitro 12/12
🐘 Postgres Nitro 6/12
▲ Vercel Nitro 7/12
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework 🥇 Fastest World Wins
Express 💻 Local 12/12
Next.js (Turbopack) ▲ Vercel 12/12
Nitro 💻 Local 12/12
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 18, 2026

🧪 E2E Test Results

Some tests failed

Summary

Passed Failed Skipped Total
✅ ▲ Vercel Production 534 0 38 572
✅ 💻 Local Development 556 0 68 624
✅ 📦 Local Production 556 0 68 624
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres 556 0 68 624
✅ 🪟 Windows 49 0 3 52
❌ 🌍 Community Worlds 111 45 9 165
✅ 📋 Other 135 0 21 156
Total 2497 45 275 2817

❌ Failed Tests

🌍 Community Worlds (45 failed)

turso (45 failed):

  • addTenWorkflow
  • addTenWorkflow
  • should work with react rendering in step
  • promiseAllWorkflow
  • promiseRaceWorkflow
  • promiseAnyWorkflow
  • hookWorkflow
  • webhookWorkflow
  • sleepingWorkflow
  • parallelSleepWorkflow
  • nullByteWorkflow
  • workflowAndStepMetadataWorkflow
  • fetchWorkflow
  • promiseRaceStressTestWorkflow
  • error handling error propagation workflow errors nested function calls preserve message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation workflow errors cross-file imports preserve message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation step errors basic step error preserves message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation step errors cross-file step error preserves message and function names in stack
  • error handling retry behavior regular Error retries until success
  • error handling retry behavior FatalError fails immediately without retries
  • error handling retry behavior RetryableError respects custom retryAfter delay
  • error handling retry behavior maxRetries=0 disables retries
  • error handling retry behavior workflow completes despite transient 5xx on step_completed
  • error handling catchability FatalError can be caught and detected with FatalError.is()
  • hookCleanupTestWorkflow - hook token reuse after workflow completion
  • concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously
  • stepFunctionPassingWorkflow - step function references can be passed as arguments (without closure vars)
  • stepFunctionWithClosureWorkflow - step function with closure variables passed as argument
  • closureVariableWorkflow - nested step functions with closure variables
  • spawnWorkflowFromStepWorkflow - spawning a child workflow using start() inside a step
  • health check (queue-based) - workflow and step endpoints respond to health check messages
  • pathsAliasWorkflow - TypeScript path aliases resolve correctly
  • Calculator.calculate - static workflow method using static step methods from another class
  • AllInOneService.processNumber - static workflow method using sibling static step methods
  • ChainableService.processWithThis - static step methods using this to reference the class
  • thisSerializationWorkflow - step function invoked with .call() and .apply()
  • customSerializationWorkflow - custom class serialization with WORKFLOW_SERIALIZE/WORKFLOW_DESERIALIZE
  • instanceMethodStepWorkflow - instance methods with "use step" directive
  • crossContextSerdeWorkflow - classes defined in step code are deserializable in workflow context
  • stepFunctionAsStartArgWorkflow - step function reference passed as start() argument
  • cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow
  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow
  • pages router addTenWorkflow via pages router
  • pages router promiseAllWorkflow via pages router
  • pages router sleepingWorkflow via pages router

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro 48 0 4
✅ example 48 0 4
✅ express 48 0 4
✅ fastify 48 0 4
✅ hono 48 0 4
✅ nextjs-turbopack 51 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack 51 0 1
✅ nitro 48 0 4
✅ nuxt 48 0 4
✅ sveltekit 48 0 4
✅ vite 48 0 4
✅ 💻 Local Development
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 45 0 7
✅ express-stable 45 0 7
✅ fastify-stable 45 0 7
✅ hono-stable 45 0 7
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 49 0 3
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 49 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 49 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 49 0 3
✅ nitro-stable 45 0 7
✅ nuxt-stable 45 0 7
✅ sveltekit-stable 45 0 7
✅ vite-stable 45 0 7
✅ 📦 Local Production
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 45 0 7
✅ express-stable 45 0 7
✅ fastify-stable 45 0 7
✅ hono-stable 45 0 7
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 49 0 3
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 49 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 49 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 49 0 3
✅ nitro-stable 45 0 7
✅ nuxt-stable 45 0 7
✅ sveltekit-stable 45 0 7
✅ vite-stable 45 0 7
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 45 0 7
✅ express-stable 45 0 7
✅ fastify-stable 45 0 7
✅ hono-stable 45 0 7
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 49 0 3
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 49 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 49 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 49 0 3
✅ nitro-stable 45 0 7
✅ nuxt-stable 45 0 7
✅ sveltekit-stable 45 0 7
✅ vite-stable 45 0 7
✅ 🪟 Windows
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack 49 0 3
❌ 🌍 Community Worlds
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ mongodb-dev 3 0 0
✅ mongodb 49 0 3
✅ redis-dev 3 0 0
✅ redis 49 0 3
✅ turso-dev 3 0 0
❌ turso 4 45 3
✅ 📋 Other
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable 45 0 7
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable 45 0 7
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable 45 0 7

📋 View full workflow run

These files are covered by the global gitignore but were
committed before the ignore rule was added.
@johnlindquist
Copy link
Contributor Author

Superseded by #1116 which consolidates all recipes into a single PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant