-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33.7k
fix(compiler): skip if guard when condition is empty after modifiers #12321
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: dev
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you add a test?
@posva test is added |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi! I'm a grad student working on a research project about using large language models to automate code review. Based on your commit b0675cf and the changes in test/unit/modules/compiler/codegen.spec.js, my tool generated this comment:
- Null Checks on Event Object: Add a check to ensure that
$event
is valid before accessing its properties: -
- if (!$event || !$event.ctrlKey || !$event.shiftKey || !$event.altKey || !$event.metaKey) return null;
-
- Error Handling: Wrap the
onClick.apply
call in a try-catch block to handle any potential exceptions gracefully. - Test Coverage: Include additional test cases that check for scenarios where one or more modifiers are missing to ensure that the event handler does not execute in those cases.
- Edge Cases: Consider edge cases where the event might be triggered without any modifiers or with only some of them. Ensure that the function behaves as expected in those scenarios.
- Scalability of Test Cases: Consider creating a parameterized test setup that can iterate over different combinations of modifiers and events to reduce redundancy.
As part of my research, I'm trying to understand how useful these comments are in real-world development. If you have a moment, I'd be super grateful if you could quickly reply to these two yes/no questions:
- Does this comment provide suggestions from a dimension you hadn’t considered?
-
- Do you find this comment helpful?
Thanks a lot for your time and feedback! And sorry again if this message is a bother.
fix #12319
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check at least one)
Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one)
If yes, please describe the impact and migration path for existing applications:
The PR fulfills these requirements:
dev
branch for v2.x (or to a previous version branch), not themaster
branchfix #xxx[,#xxx]
, where "xxx" is the issue number)If adding a new feature, the PR's description includes:
Other information: