Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

a1exsh
Copy link
Member

@a1exsh a1exsh commented Nov 14, 2021

This came up again recently and it seems that the relation should be further elaborated.
Random UUIDs are not suitable in certain situations (without intermediate persistence),
even though they are guaranteed to be "unique from the perspective of the owning application",
as required in rule 211.

This came up again recently and it seems that the relation should be further elaborated.
Random UUIDs are not suitable in certain situations (without intermediate persistence),
even though they are guaranteed to be "unique from the perspective of the owning application",
as required in rule 211.
Copy link
Member

@tfrauenstein tfrauenstein left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thx. looks good -- just two minor change proposals.

Address review comments.
@a1exsh
Copy link
Member Author

a1exsh commented Nov 15, 2021

@tfrauenstein thank you for your comments!

Do you think it is appropriate here to touch upon the two common strategies for publishers to ensure stable event id on retry, namely: intermediate persistence and consistent hashing?

@tfrauenstein
Copy link
Member

Yes, adding a 'design hint' might be helpful here, if it is not too long.
But let us clarify it offline to avoid ping-pong here.

Add design hint for stable eid on retry.
@tfrauenstein
Copy link
Member

👍

@tkrop
Copy link
Member

tkrop commented Dec 7, 2021

@a1exsh sorry for the long delay and thanks for the contribution. Bad timing with Cyber Week and the prepared restructuring. Can you please resolve the conflict? Than I would also approve and merge the change.

@a1exsh
Copy link
Member Author

a1exsh commented Dec 7, 2021

@tkrop @tfrauenstein please have another look

@tfrauenstein
Copy link
Member

👍

1 similar comment
@tkrop
Copy link
Member

tkrop commented Dec 9, 2021

👍

@tkrop tkrop merged commit 9d32bc2 into zalando:master Dec 9, 2021
@a1exsh a1exsh deleted the patch-2 branch December 9, 2021 15:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants