Are there a lot of reputable sources that the U.S. was involved in La Violencia?

I’ve studied Colombian history as well as US involvement in South America and have not read about any connections.

Google search shows this but I’m not sure it’s a trustable source https://colombiareports.com/50-years-us-intervention-colombia/

Or maybe a hot dog bowl, it’s like a burrito bowl but it’s chopped up hot dogs in a big old bread bowl

Historically when there weren’t enough women in the group they would raid another group and kidnap women in order to have enough children to continue their group. With cooperation, groups began to trade girls for goods with other groups. It is likely that this caused the decline of matriarchal households, because the new girls were foreign to the group and living in the home with her new husband and the husband’s mother.

So he was buying her gifts and putting money on her books and calling her on the phone? Prison guards fucking prisoners is like the worst crime, IMO

Dick and Jane went up the hill each with buckshot and a sawed-off

deleted by creator

There’s a lot of wires but they aren’t twisted and tangled, they’re organized and run straight.

Maybe eat more hot dogs?

Statistically a group of 27 mating pairs is the minimum you can have before you run the risk of not having enough girls born to continue the population

How long would it take to grow six teeth? 24 years?

I’ve had enough! I’m leaving then! 😂

Really interesting. I just read the Bank of England’s companion article: Money in the modern economy, an introduction https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/quarterly-bulletin/2014/q1/money-in-the-modern-economy-an-introduction

I didn’t consider that you could still classify banking as fractional reserve banking even though there are no fractional reserve banking requirements. In my mind the concept was one of regulatory oversight.

Do you think that when a bank loans money to another bank they are creating money out of thin air? If they can do that then why do they need to borrow money?

I think you’re doing a good job interpreting and explaining modern monetary theory, I just don’t agree with all of it, although I agree with the concept.

Do you believe that the US government must collect taxes before it can spend money? Or do you agree that government spending is self financed and money creation (in spending by the US government) is only limited by concerns of inflation?

Do you believe that Banks hold digital money in their reserves? I do. Who do you think created that money?

My Hero by Foo Fighters

You’re right that that article does talk about banks creating money and it’s true that banks can create money when they lend more than they have in reserves and assets. But my larger point was that IMO bank loans are credit but the bank loans are repaid with actual money. Maybe it’s semantics.

Also, you mentioned fractional reserve banking but that no longer exists. It ended around 2020 when the government changed regulations and no longer requires banks to hold any ratio of reserves to debt.

When a bank issues a loan it creates a credit in the borrower’s account. When the borrower withdraws/transfers the money from their account the money comes from the bank’s reserves. The bank’s reserves consists of deposits and other liquid assets. The money in the bank’s reserves started its life by being created by the federal government. You may argue that the bank is loaning money that it does not hold in reserves, but for lack of a better description, this is a huge liability for the bank that can create insolvency issues (bank run). For this reason, I do not agree that banks create money when they issue loans, since the bank’s reserves are not created by the bank.

Money collected from taxes is basically recorded in a ledger / account by the Treasury. Some people look at this as the end of the lifespan of that money or the destruction of that money.

Money begins its life by being spent by the federal government. They essentially create money with the press of a keystroke (granted they are spending funds which are approved by Congress and allocated for projects), the money credits a Treasury account, then they transfer it / spend it which puts the money into circulation.

The federal government does not actually NEED the money you pay in taxes to fund their spending. Money does not come from people. It is created solely by the treasury. The federal government WANTS the money from taxes to approximately match the amount they put into circulation through spending in order to prevent runaway inflation. If they spend more than they collect they are adding to the supply of money which seems to be normal for a society with a growing population and successful marketplaces, but if they spend too much you get inflation.

The federal government believes that balancing is important. They want the amount of goods and services that America exports globally to match the amount America imports. Each year there is a deficit which means that America receives more goods and services than it exports. In order to balance this, the Treasury issues bonds equaling the amount of the year’s trade deficit. We don’t have to do this but we choose to because we believe it will create financial stability.

When the US issues bonds it collects money and gives a promise to make interest payments and to repay those bonds when they are due. Those bonds are debt. This is essentially how the government borrows money.

This is a fantastic article from the Bank of England which is like the US Treasury https://share.google/GmWpluu76vSJpuw5C

Edit: read the discussion below for more context and clarification. Banks create more money then the federal government does, I wasn’t aware.

It just sounds like they haven’t reached an agreement regarding pay increase. It doesn’t say they took any action to oppose the union from forming.

“Union representatives said performers’ wages there average $21 to $26 an hour.”

Another poster said that the restaurant is a money pit but their startup costs were so high from renovation that it’s impossible to be profitable yet. That doesn’t mean they’re not profitable on a month-to-month basis.