registry: add cargo-release#10258
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughA new registry configuration file for the ChangesCargo-release registry entry
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
Greptile SummaryAdds a registry shorthand for
Confidence Score: 4/5Safe to merge; the entry is structurally correct and follows existing conventions. The only gap is the missing cargo: backend that all peer entries carry. The file follows the established registry format — description, github: backend, and a version smoke test — and is consistent with how other tools in the registry are defined. The sole observation is that every other cargo-* entry lists a cargo: fallback backend, and this one does not despite the crate being published to crates.io. registry/cargo-release.toml — missing cargo: backend worth adding before merge Important Files Changed
Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "registry: add cargo-release" | Re-trigger Greptile |
| @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | |||
| backends = ["github:crate-ci/cargo-release"] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
cargo-* registry entry (cargo-binstall, cargo-dist, cargo-insta, cargo-make) includes a cargo: backend alongside the primary one. cargo-release is published to crates.io, so omitting it leaves users who can't reach GitHub release assets without a fallback.
| backends = ["github:crate-ci/cargo-release"] | |
| backends = ["github:crate-ci/cargo-release", "cargo:cargo-release"] |
Note: If this suggestion doesn't match your team's coding style, reply to this and let me know. I'll remember it for next time!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@registry/cargo-release.toml`:
- Line 3: The test currently runs "cargo release --version" which invokes the
system "cargo" binary instead of the installed tool; update the test
configuration so test.cmd uses the installed binary name "cargo-release
--version" (keeping expected = "cargo-release {{version}}") to ensure the runner
executes the installed cargo-release binary rather than the top-level cargo
command.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 42472250-1c30-42b8-8774-bf91a567b5ba
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
registry/cargo-release.toml
| @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | |||
| backends = ["github:crate-ci/cargo-release"] | |||
| description = "Cargo subcommand for releasing crates" | |||
| test = { cmd = "cargo release --version", expected = "cargo-release {{version}}" } | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use the installed binary name in test.cmd to avoid false negatives.
The runner resolves/execut es only the first token of cmd; using cargo release --version makes the test hinge on a cargo binary being present, not strictly on the installed cargo-release tool. This can fail even when cargo-release is correctly installed.
Suggested fix
-test = { cmd = "cargo release --version", expected = "cargo-release {{version}}" }
+test = { cmd = "cargo-release --version", expected = "cargo-release {{version}}" }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| test = { cmd = "cargo release --version", expected = "cargo-release {{version}}" } | |
| test = { cmd = "cargo-release --version", expected = "cargo-release {{version}}" } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@registry/cargo-release.toml` at line 3, The test currently runs "cargo
release --version" which invokes the system "cargo" binary instead of the
installed tool; update the test configuration so test.cmd uses the installed
binary name "cargo-release --version" (keeping expected = "cargo-release
{{version}}") to ensure the runner executes the installed cargo-release binary
rather than the top-level cargo command.
Hyperfine Performance
|
| Command | Mean [ms] | Min [ms] | Max [ms] | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|---|
mise-2026.6.0 x -- echo |
20.8 ± 1.6 | 17.7 | 28.1 | 1.00 |
mise x -- echo |
21.2 ± 1.8 | 18.1 | 31.3 | 1.02 ± 0.12 |
mise env
| Command | Mean [ms] | Min [ms] | Max [ms] | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|---|
mise-2026.6.0 env |
20.3 ± 1.5 | 17.8 | 26.0 | 1.00 |
mise env |
20.9 ± 1.7 | 17.9 | 26.5 | 1.03 ± 0.11 |
mise hook-env
| Command | Mean [ms] | Min [ms] | Max [ms] | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|---|
mise-2026.6.0 hook-env |
21.0 ± 1.5 | 18.1 | 26.1 | 1.00 |
mise hook-env |
21.4 ± 1.7 | 18.5 | 30.2 | 1.02 ± 0.11 |
mise ls
| Command | Mean [ms] | Min [ms] | Max [ms] | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|---|
mise-2026.6.0 ls |
17.1 ± 1.4 | 14.2 | 21.8 | 1.00 |
mise ls |
17.7 ± 1.7 | 14.7 | 24.5 | 1.04 ± 0.13 |
xtasks/test/perf
| Command | mise-2026.6.0 | mise | Variance |
|---|---|---|---|
| install (cached) | 145ms | 147ms | -1% |
| ls (cached) | 67ms | 64ms | +4% |
| bin-paths (cached) | 71ms | 73ms | -2% |
| task-ls (cached) | 139ms | 139ms | +0% |
Summary
cargo-releaseregistry shorthand backed bygithub:crate-ci/cargo-releasecargo release --versionsmoke testPopularity
Test
cargo build --all-featurestarget/debug/mise test-tool cargo-releaseThis PR was generated by an AI coding assistant.
Note
Cursor Bugbot is generating a summary for commit 49fb071. Configure here.
Summary by CodeRabbit